Information Systems Development as a Research Method

This paper takes the stance that some cases of information systems development can be considered knowledge creating activities, and, in those cases, information systems development can be a legitimate research method. In these cases not only is knowledge created about the development process itself but also a deeper understanding emerges about the organisational problem that the system is designed to solve. The paper begins with a brief overview of research in the design sciences and a comparison of research methods that are concerned with the design, and use, of information systems. This is followed by an assessment of the way systems development as a research method deals with the scientific research processes of data collection, analysis, synthesis and display. A case study, where the systems development research method was use, is described to illustrate the method and give the reader a better understanding of the approach.

[1]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Computer-mediated activity: functional organs in social and developmental contexts , 1995 .

[2]  F. Blackler.  KNOWLEDGE AND THE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONS: ORGANIZATIONS AS ACTIVITY SYSTEMS AND THE REFRAMING OF MANAGEMENT* , 1993 .

[3]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Diversity in information systems action research methods , 1998 .

[5]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  A CRITICAL REVIEW OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT MODELS , 1999 .

[6]  K. Lukka,et al.  The constructive approach in management accounting research , 1993 .

[7]  Ilkka Niiniluoto,et al.  Futures studies: science or art? , 2001 .

[8]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[9]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Knowledge management technology and the reproduction of knowledge work practices , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems Development in Information Systems Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[12]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The systems development or engineering approach to research in information systems: an action research perspective , 1999 .

[13]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[14]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[15]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[16]  Helen Hasan,et al.  A Multifaceted Approach to Distributed Communities of Learning and Practice , 2003 .

[17]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  A Theory of Theories in Information Systems , 2002 .

[18]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Codifying or enabling: the challenge of knowledge management systems , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[19]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Socio-Technical Systems for Knowledge Mobilisation in Communities , 2003 .

[20]  Jaakko Virkkunen,et al.  Understanding organizational learning by focusing on “activity systems” , 2000 .

[21]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[22]  Murray Silverstein,et al.  A Pattern Language , 1977 .

[23]  Colin Yallop,et al.  The Macquarie Dictionary , 1996, English Today.

[24]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Stephen Toulmin.  Perspectives on activity theory: Knowledge as shared procedures , 1999 .