Effects of sharing text selections on gaze cross-recurrence and interaction quality in a pair programming task

We present a dual eye-tracking study that demonstrates the effect of sharing selection among collaborators in a remote pair-programming scenario. Forty pairs of engineering students completed several program understanding tasks while their gaze was synchronously recorded. The coupling of the programmers' focus of attention was measured by a cross-recurrence analysis of gaze that captures how much programmers look at the same sequence of spots within a short time span. A high level of gaze cross-recurrence is typical for pairs who actively engage in grounding efforts to build and maintain shared understanding. As part of their grounding efforts, programmers may use text selection to perform collaborative references. Broadcast selections serve as indexing sites for the selector as they attract non-selector's gaze shortly after they become visible. Gaze cross-recurrence is highest when selectors accompany their selections with speech to produce a multimodal reference.

[1]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Changing Ideas about Reference , 2004 .

[2]  Laurie A. Williams,et al.  All I really need to know about pair programming I learned in kindergarten , 2000, Commun. ACM.

[3]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Visual Information as a Conversational Resource in Collaborative Physical Tasks , 2003, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[4]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article WHAT THE EYES SAY ABOUT SPEAKING , 2022 .

[5]  Darren Gergle,et al.  See what i'm saying?: using Dyadic Mobile Eye tracking to study collaborative reference , 2011, CSCW.

[6]  A. Bangerter,et al.  Using Pointing and Describing to Achieve Joint Focus of Attention in Dialogue , 2004, Psychological science.

[7]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  Unravelling cross-recurrence: coupling across timescales , 2012 .

[8]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  Collaboration and abstract representations: towards predictive models based on raw speech and eye-tracking data , 2009, CSCL.

[9]  Nikol Rummel,et al.  A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[10]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Deixis and gaze in collaborative work at a distance (over a shared map): a computational model to detect misunderstandings , 2008, ETRA.

[11]  Marc-Antoine Nüssli Dual Eye-Tracking Methods for the Study of Remote Collaborative Problem Solving , 2011 .

[12]  Donald A. Cox,et al.  Supporting collaborative interpretation in distributed Groupware , 2000, CSCW '00.

[13]  Mirweis Sangin Peer knowledge modeling in computer supported collaborative learning , 2009 .

[14]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Referring as a collaborative process , 1986, Cognition.

[15]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  This is it ! : Indicating and looking in collaborative work at distance , 2010 .

[16]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[17]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[18]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Sharing Solutions: Persistence and Grounding in Multimodal Collaborative Problem Solving , 2006 .

[19]  H. H. Clark Pointing and placing. , 2003 .

[20]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[21]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  Collaborative Gaze Footprints: Correlates of Interaction Quality , 2011, CSCL.

[22]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  The Art of Conversation Is Coordination , 2007, Psychological science.

[23]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Using Visual Information for Grounding and Awareness in Collaborative Tasks , 2012, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[24]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Nominal Cross Recurrence as a Generalized Lag Sequential Analysis for Behavioral Streams , 2011, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[25]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Looking To Understand: The Coupling Between Speakers' and Listeners' Eye Movements and Its Relationship to Discourse Comprehension , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Laurie Williams,et al.  Exploring Pair Programming in Distributed Object-Oriented Team Projects , 2002 .

[27]  Alejandra Martínez-Monés,et al.  From Mirroring to Guiding: A Review of State of the Art Technology for Supporting Collaborative Learning , 2005, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[28]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Unraveling the Dyad: Using Recurrence Analysis to Explore Patterns of Syntactic Coordination Between Children and Caregivers in Conversation , 2006 .