Impact of biodegradation test methods on the development and applicability of biodegradation QSARs.

The biodegradability of a substance depends on the structure and physical form of the substance, the time that has been available for acclimation, and the environmental conditions. Importantly, these later factors can be just as important as structure in determining the outcome of a biodegradation test. The development of appropriate QSARs for biodegradation and the ultimate value of the final QSAR depends on understanding these factors. This paper will describe what is known about the effect of test conditions on the results of biodegradation tests. The ability of these tests to reflect real environmental conditions will also be examined. Finally, we will discuss what we believe, in the light of this information, should be the goal of biodegradation QSARs and how these QSARs can be most appropriately used in fate assessments.

[1]  J Devillers Neural modelling of the biodegradability of benzene derivatives. , 1993, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[2]  J. Vestal,et al.  Mineralization of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) and linear alcohol ethoxylate (LAE) in 11 contrasting soils , 1990 .

[3]  C. Pettigrew,et al.  Aerobic Biodegradation of Synthetic and Natural Polymeric Materials: A Component of Integrated Solid-Waste Management , 1995 .

[4]  J. King,et al.  Fate and distribution of a quaternary ammonium surfactant, octadecyltrimethylammonium chloride (OTAC), in wastewater treatment , 1982 .

[5]  R. Larson Comparison of biodegradation rates in laboratory screening studies with rates in natural waters. , 1983, Residue reviews.

[6]  D. Versteeg,et al.  Integrated approach for environmental assessment of new and existing substances. , 1995, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[7]  D Zakarya,et al.  Quantitative structure-biodegradability relationships (QSBRs) using modified autocorrelation method (MAM). , 1993, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[8]  Herbert S. Rosenkranz,et al.  Application of the computer‐automated structure evaluation (CASE) program to the study of structure‐biodegradation relationships of miscellaneous chemicals , 1993 .

[9]  R. Larson Estimation of Biodegradation Potential of Xenobiotic Organic Chemicals , 1979, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[10]  Robert S. Boethling,et al.  Application of molecular topology to quantitative structure‐biodegradability relationships , 1986 .

[11]  R. Larson,et al.  Biodegradation of linear alcohol ethoxylates in natural waters , 1981 .

[12]  R. Larson,et al.  Fate of the Benzene Ring of Linear Alkylbenzene Sulfonate in Natural Waters , 1981, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[13]  Robert S. Boethling,et al.  Predictive model for aerobic biodegradability developed from a file of evaluated biodegradation data , 1992 .

[14]  R. Larson,et al.  Biodegradation kinetics of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate in sludge-amended agricultural soils. , 1989, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.