Young-boy networks without kin clusters in a lek-mating manakin

I use 10 years of data from a long-term study of lek-mating long-tailed manakins to relate the social network among males to their spatial and genetic structure. Previously, I showed that the network connectivity of young males predicts their future success. Here, I ask whether kinship might shape the organization of this “young-boy network”. Not surprisingly, males that were more socially distant (linked by longer network paths) were affiliated with perch zones (lek arenas) that were further apart. Relatedness (r) among males within the network decreased as social distance increased, as might be expected under kin selection. Nevertheless, any role for indirect inclusive fitness benefits is refuted by the slightly negative mean relatedness among males at all social distances within the network (overall mean r = −0.06). That is, relatedness ranged from slightly negative (−0.04) to more negative (−0.2). In contrast, relatedness in dyads for which at least one of the males was outside the social network (involving at least one blood-sampled male not documented to have interacted with other banded males) was slightly above the random expectation (mean r = 0.05). The slight variations around r = 0 among males of different categories likely reflect dispersal dynamics, rather than any influence of kinship on social organization. Relatedness did not covary with the age difference between males. These results, together with previous results for lack of relatedness between alpha and beta male partners, refute any role for kin selection in the evolution of cooperative display in this lek-mating system.

[1]  H. Kokko,et al.  Kin selection and the evolution of leks: whose success do young males maximize? , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  S. Emlen,et al.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. , 1977, Science.

[3]  G. McCracken,et al.  ON ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  R. Wayne,et al.  Microsatellite DNA analysis shows that greater sage grouse leks are not kin groups , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[5]  J. Höglund,et al.  Fine-scale genetic structuring on Manacus manacus leks , 2000, Nature.

[6]  D. Lusseau,et al.  Animal social networks: an introduction , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  M. Zelen,et al.  Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples☆ , 1989 .

[8]  D. McDonald,et al.  Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[10]  David B. McDonald,et al.  Correlates of male mating success in a lekking bird with male-male cooperation , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  J. Krause,et al.  Potential banana skins in animal social network analysis , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  D. McDonald Delayed Plumage Maturation and Orderly Queues for Status: A Manakin Mannequin Experiment , 2010 .

[13]  A. Lundberg,et al.  Microsatellite markers reveal the potential for kin selection on black grouse leks , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  C. Hughes INTEGRATING MOLECULAR TECHNIQUES WITH FIELD METHODS IN STUDIES OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR: A REVOLUTION RESULTS , 1998 .

[15]  Singing performance, frequency matching and courtship success of long-tailed manakins (Chiroxiphia linearis) , 1995, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  D. Krakauer,et al.  Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates , 2006, Nature.

[17]  A. Griffin,et al.  Cooperation and Competition Between Relatives , 2002, Science.

[18]  S. Doucet,et al.  PLUMAGE DEVELOPMENT AND MOLT IN LONG-TAILED MANAKINS (CHIROXIPHIA LINEARIS): VARIATION ACCORDING TO SEX AND AGE , 2018 .

[19]  M. Petrie,et al.  Peacocks lek with relatives even in the absence of social and environmental cues , 1999, Nature.

[20]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age , 2003 .

[21]  Alan H. Krakauer,et al.  Kin selection and cooperative courtship in wild turkeys , 2005, Nature.

[22]  M. Deutsch Cooperation and competition , 2011, The International Encyclopedia of Biological Anthropology.

[23]  D. Lusseau Evidence for social role in a dolphin social network , 2006, Evolutionary Ecology.

[24]  D. McDonald MICROSATELLITE DNA EVIDENCE FOR GENE FLOW IN NEOTROPICAL LEK-MATING LONG-TAILED MANAKINS , 2003 .

[25]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[26]  W. Potts,et al.  Cooperative display and relatedness among males in a lek-mating bird. , 1994, Science.

[27]  D. McDonald Demographic consequences of sexual selection in the long-tailed manakin , 1993 .

[28]  G. E. Woolfenden,et al.  Contrasting genetic structures in sister species of North American scrub-jays , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  David Lusseau,et al.  A killer whale social network is vulnerable to targeted removals , 2006, Biology Letters.

[30]  K. N. Laland,et al.  Social structure and co-operative interactions in a wild population of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[31]  D. McDonald Cooperation Under Sexual Selection: Age-Graded Changes in a Lekking Bird , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[32]  C. McCulloch,et al.  Analyzing Discrete Movement Data as a Correlated Random Walk , 1989 .

[33]  P. Parker,et al.  Kin selection does not explain male aggregation at leks of 4 manakin species , 2007 .