Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Gow. Does English coronal place assimilation create lexical ambiguity , 2002 .
[2] K. Stevens,et al. Effect of burst amplitude on the perception of stop consonant place of articulation. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] K. Hale,et al. Ken Hale: A Life in Language , 2001 .
[4] Dennis H. Klatt,et al. Speech perception: a model of acoustic–phonetic analysis and lexical access , 1979 .
[5] B. Lindblom,et al. Numerical Simulation of Vowel Quality Systems: The Role of Perceptual Contrast , 1972 .
[6] L. Boves,et al. On subglottal formant analysis. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] Marilyn Y. Chen. Nasal detection module for a knowledge-based speech recognition system , 2000, INTERSPEECH.
[8] Sharlene A. Liu,et al. Landmark detection for distinctive feature-based speech recognition , 1996 .
[9] J. McCarthy. Feature Geometry and Dependency: A Review , 1988 .
[10] R. Krakow. NONSEGMENTAL INFLUENCES ON VELUM MOVEMENT PATTERNS: SYLLABLES, SENTENCES, STRESS, AND SPEAKING RATE , 1993 .
[11] Kenneth N. Stevens,et al. On the quantal nature of speech , 1972 .
[12] H M Hanson,et al. Glottal characteristics of female speakers: acoustic correlates. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] K. Stevens,et al. A Note on Laryngeal Features , 2003 .
[14] D. Gow. Assimilation and Anticipation in Continuous Spoken Word Recognition , 2001 .
[15] David W. Gow,et al. How word onsets drive lexical access and segmentation: evidence from acoustics, phonology and processing , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.
[16] Marilyn Y. Chen,et al. Acoustic correlates of English and French nasalized vowels. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] D. Klatt,et al. Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] Kenneth N. Stevens,et al. Diverse Acoustic Cues at Consonantal Landmarks , 2000, Phonetica.
[19] K. Kohler. Phonetic Explanation in Phonology: The Feature Fortis/Lenis , 1984, Phonetica.
[20] Keith Johnson,et al. The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology , 2001 .
[21] Anne Cutler,et al. The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary , 1987 .
[22] Jeung-Yoon Choi,et al. Detection of consonant voicing: a module for a hierarchical speech recognition system , 1999 .
[23] James R. Glass. Finding acoustic regularities in speech: applications to phonetic recognition , 1988 .
[24] Walter Sun. Analysis and interpretation of glide characteristics in pursuit of an algorithm for recognition , 1996 .
[25] James Glass,et al. The SUMMIT speech recognition system: phonological modelling and lexical access , 1990, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.
[26] Björn Lindblom,et al. Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .
[27] R L Diehl,et al. The Role of Phonetics within the Study of Language , 1991, Phonetica.
[28] S. Shattuck-Hufnagel. The role of word structure in segmental serial ordering , 1992, Cognition.
[29] K. Stevens,et al. Knowledge of language and the sounds of speech , 1991 .
[30] Sharon Y. Manuel,et al. Speakers nasalize /∂/ after /n/, but listeners still hear /∂/ , 1995 .
[31] L. Lisker,et al. A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .
[32] Osamu Fujimura,et al. Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation , 1993 .
[33] Elizabeth C. Zsiga. Acoustic evidence for gestural overlap in consonant sequences , 1994 .
[34] D. Whalen,et al. Cricothyroid activity in high and low vowels: exploring the automaticity of intrinsic F0 , 1999 .
[35] Taehong Cho,et al. Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages , 1999 .
[36] K. Stevens,et al. Feature geometry and the vocal tract , 1994, Phonology.
[37] George N. Clements,et al. The geometry of phonological features , 1985, Phonology Yearbook.
[38] A. House,et al. The Influence of Consonant Environment upon the Secondary Acoustical Characteristics of Vowels , 1953 .
[39] H. Sussman,et al. An investigation of locus equations as a source of relational invariance for stop place categorization , 1991 .
[40] John Kingston,et al. Between the grammar and physics of speech , 1994 .
[41] Willem J. M. Levelt,et al. A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[42] H. S. Gopal,et al. A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] B. Delgutte,et al. Speech coding in the auditory nerve: IV. Sounds with consonant-like dynamic characteristics. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[44] V. Zue,et al. Acoustic study of medial /t,d/ in American English , 1979 .
[45] Osamu Fujimura,et al. Nasalization of Vowels in Relation to Nasals , 1958 .
[46] P. Mermelstein. Automatic segmentation of speech into syllabic units. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[47] Kenneth N. Stevens,et al. Automatic syllable detection for vowel landmarks , 2000 .
[48] L. Chistovich,et al. The ‘center of gravity’ effect in vowel spectra and critical distance between the formants: Psychoacoustical study of the perception of vowel-like stimuli , 1979, Hearing Research.
[49] P. Ladefoged. WHAT ARE LINGUISTIC SOUNDS MADE OF , 1980 .
[50] D. Kewley-Port. Measurement of formant transitions in naturally produced stop consonant-vowel syllables. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[51] Kenneth N. Stevens,et al. Modeling stop‐consonant releases for synthesis , 2000 .