Phone vs. Tangible in Museums: A Comparative Study

Despite years of HCI research on digital technology in museums, it is still unclear how different interactions impact on visitors'. A comparative evaluation of smart replicas, phone app and smart cards looked at the personal preferences, behavioural change, and the appeal of mobiles in museums. 76 participants used all three interaction modes and gave their opinions in a questionnaire; participants interaction was also observed. The results show the phone is the most disliked interaction mode while tangible interaction (smart card and replica combined) is the most liked. Preference for the phone favour mobility to the detriment of engagement with the exhibition. Different behaviours when interacting with the phone or the tangibles where observed. The personal visiting style appeared to be only marginally affected by the device. Visitors also expect museums to provide the phones against the current trend of developing apps in a "bring your own device" approach.

[1]  Ali Mazalek,et al.  Sensing History: Contextualizing Artifacts with Sensory Interactions and Narrative Design , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[2]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  Sotto Voce: Facilitating Social Learning in a Historic House , 2008, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[3]  Marek Hatala,et al.  Kurio: a museum guide for families , 2009, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[4]  Beverly Serrell,et al.  Computers on the Exhibit Floor , 1992 .

[5]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[6]  Gary E. Burnett,et al.  Sculpting a Mobile Musical Soundtrack , 2015, CHI.

[7]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Exploring the Aesthetics of Tangible Interaction: Experiments on the Perception of Hybrid Objects , 2016, TEI.

[8]  Jan O. Borchers,et al.  Maps and Location: Acceptance of Modern Interaction Techniques for Audio Guides , 2016, CHI.

[9]  David K. McGookin,et al.  Exploring Seasonality in Mobile Cultural Heritage , 2017, CHI.

[10]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Using Tangible Smart Replicas as Controls for an Interactive Museum Exhibition , 2016, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[11]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  “I don’t understand it either, but it is cool” - visitor interactions with a multi-touch table in a museum , 2008, 2008 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems.

[12]  Luigina Ciolfi,et al.  Of turf fires, fine linen, and Porter cake: design for living history , 2012, INTR.

[13]  Daniel Pletinckx,et al.  Tangible interfaces for digital museum applications , 2015, 2015 Digital Heritage.

[14]  Maria Economou,et al.  Promising Beginning? Evaluating Museum Mobile Phone Apps , 2011 .

[15]  Nick Dulake,et al.  Articulating Co-Design in Museums: Reflections on Two Participatory Processes , 2016, CSCW.

[16]  Thomas Hillman,et al.  Instagram at the museum: communicating the museum experience through social photo sharing , 2013, CHI.

[17]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  User-Centred Design of Flexible Hypermedia for a Mobile Guide: Reflections on the HyperAudio Experience , 2005, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[18]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Shaping experiences in the hunt museum: a design case study , 2004, DIS '04.

[19]  Jouke Verlinden,et al.  Nonlinear stories told by cups and saucers: Smart replic as with response 3D audio , 2013 .

[20]  A. Bickford.  Identity and the Museum Visitor Experience , 2010 .

[21]  Marek Hatala,et al.  Situated play in a tangible interface and adaptive audio museum guide , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[22]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Tangible data souvenirs as a bridge between a physical museum visit and online digital experience , 2016, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[23]  Dirk vom Lehn,et al.  DISPLACING THE OBJECT: MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES AND INTERPRETIVE RESOURCES , 2003 .

[24]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Making Magic: Designing for Open Interactions in Museum Settings , 2015, Creativity & Cognition.

[25]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Gestures in the wild: studying multi-touch gesture sequences on interactive tabletop exhibits , 2011, CHI.

[26]  Steve Benford,et al.  see me, feel me, touch me, hear me: trajectories and interpretation in a sculpture garden , 2013, CHI.

[27]  Thomas R. Henry.  The Smithsonian Institution , 1949, Nature.

[28]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Integrating material and digital: a new way for cultural heritage , 2013, INTR.

[29]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Do it together : the effect of curators, designers, and technologists sharing the making of new interactive visitors’ experiences , 2016 .

[30]  Tsvi Kuflik,et al.  Analyzing Museum Visitors' Behavior Patterns , 2007, User Modeling.