Grouped Automatic Relevance Determination and Its Application in Channel Selection for P300 BCIs

During the development of a brain-computer interface, it is beneficial to exploit information in multiple electrode signals. However, a small channel subset is favored for not only machine learning feasibility, but also practicality in commercial and clinical BCI applications. An embedded channel selection approach based on grouped automatic relevance determination is proposed. The proposed Gaussian conjugate group-sparse prior and the embedded nature of the concerned Bayesian linear model enable simultaneous channel selection and feature classification. Moreover, with the marginal likelihood (evidence) maximization technique, hyper-parameters that determine the sparsity of the model are directly estimated from the training set, avoiding time-consuming cross-validation. Experiments have been conducted on P300 speller BCIs. The results for both public and in-house datasets show that the channels selected by our techniques yield competitive classification performance with the state-of-the-art and are biologically relevant to P300.

[1]  J. Polich,et al.  Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[2]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  H. Zou The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties , 2006 .

[4]  E. W. Sellers,et al.  Toward enhanced P300 speller performance , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[5]  Helge J. Ritter,et al.  BCI competition 2003-data set IIb: support vector machines for the P300 speller paradigm , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  A regularized discriminative framework for EEG analysis with application to brain–computer interface , 2010, NeuroImage.

[7]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Bayesian feature selection applied in a p300 brain-computer interface , 2008, 2008 16th European Signal Processing Conference.

[8]  Hubert Cecotti,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for P300 Detection with Application to Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Minpeng Xu,et al.  Channel Selection Based on Phase Measurement in P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[11]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Support vector channel selection in BCI , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Yuanqing Li,et al.  An Online Semi-supervised Brain–Computer Interface , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Alain Rakotomamonjy,et al.  BCI Competition III: Dataset II- Ensemble of SVMs for BCI P300 Speller , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Isabelle Guyon,et al.  An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[15]  Jun Lu,et al.  Adaptive Laplacian filtering for sensorimotor rhythm-based brain–computer interfaces , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[16]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ1 Minimization , 2007, 0711.1612.

[17]  Jen-Tzung Chien,et al.  Bayesian group sparse learning for music source separation , 2013, EURASIP J. Audio Speech Music. Process..

[18]  J. W. Minett,et al.  Optimizing the P300-based brain–computer interface: current status, limitations and future directions , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  David P. Wipf,et al.  A New View of Automatic Relevance Determination , 2007, NIPS.

[20]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[21]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  An efficient P300-based brain–computer interface for disabled subjects , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  Jun Lu,et al.  Adaptive Spatio-Temporal Filtering for Movement Related Potentials in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[23]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  M. Yuan,et al.  Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables , 2006 .

[25]  O Bertrand,et al.  A robust sensor-selection method for P300 brain–computer interfaces , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[26]  Volker Roth,et al.  The Bayesian group-Lasso for analyzing contingency tables , 2009, ICML '09.