Object classification in astronomical multi-color surveys

We present a photometric method for identifying stars, galaxies and quasars in multi-color surveys, which uses a library of > 65000 color templates for comparison with observed objects. The method aims for extracting the information content of object colors in a statistically correct way, and performs a classication as well as a redshift estimation for galaxies and quasars in a unied approach based on the same probability density functions. For the redshift estimation, we employ an advanced version of the Minimum Error Variance estimator which determines the redshift error from the redshift dependent probability density function itself. The method was originally developed for the Calar Alto Deep Imaging Survey (CADIS), but is now used in a wide variety of survey projects. We checked its performance by spectroscopy of CADIS objects, where the method provides high reliability (6 errors among 151 objects with R< 24), especially for the quasar selection, and redshifts accurate within z 0:03 for galaxies and z 0:1 for quasars. For an optimization of future survey eorts, a few model surveys are compared, which are designed to use the same total amount of telescope time but dierent sets of broad-band and medium-band lters. Their performance is investigated by Monte-Carlo simulations as well as by analytic evaluation in terms of classication and redshift estimation. If photon noise were the only error source, broad-band surveys and medium-band surveys should perform equally well, as long as they provide the same spectral coverage. In practice, medium-band surveys show superior performance due to their higher tolerance for calibration errors and cosmic variance. Finally, we discuss the relevance of color calibration and derive important conclusions for the issues of library design and choice of lters. The calibration accuracy poses strong constraints on an accurate classication, which are most critical for surveys with few, broad and deeply exposed lters, but less severe for surveys with many, narrow and less deep lters.

[1]  M. Irwin,et al.  APM Z ≥ 4 QSO Survey: Spectra and Intervening Absorption Systems , 1996, astro-ph/9604021.

[2]  P. Hewett,et al.  A High Signal-to-Noise Ratio Composite Quasar Spectrum , 1991 .

[3]  M. Pettini,et al.  Lyman Limit Imaging of High Redshift Galaxies. III. New Observations of 4 QSO Fields , 1995 .

[4]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[5]  Stephen J. Warren,et al.  A wide-field multicolor survey for high-redshift quasars, z above 2. 2. I. Photometric catalog and survey selection function , 1991 .

[6]  A. Kinney,et al.  Template ultraviolet to near-infrared spectra of star-forming galaxies and their application to K-corrections , 1996 .

[7]  Richard F. Green,et al.  Quasar evolution derived from the Palomar bright quasar survey and other complete quasar surveys. , 1983 .

[8]  N. Roche,et al.  Galaxy number counts - III. Deep CCD observations to B=27.5 mag , 1995 .

[9]  K. Meisenheimer,et al.  Multi-color classification in the calar alto deep imaging survey , 2000, astro-ph/0010604.

[10]  J. E. Gunn,et al.  Stellar spectrophotometric atlas, wavelengths from 3130 to 10800 A , 1983 .

[11]  S. J. Lilly,et al.  The Canada-France Redshift Survey. IV. Spectroscopic Selection Effects and 0300+00 Field Spectroscopic Data , 1995 .

[12]  E. al.,et al.  The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical summary , 2000, astro-ph/0006396.

[13]  John N. Bahcall,et al.  Predicted star counts in selected fields and photometric bands Applications to galactic structure, the disk luminosity function, and the detection of a massive halo , 1981 .

[14]  Bruce A. Peterson,et al.  The evolution of optically selected QSOs – II , 1987 .

[15]  P. Sander Decision and estimation theory , 1980 .

[16]  A. Pickles A Stellar Spectral Flux Library: 1150–25000 Å , 1998 .

[17]  J. B. Oke Faint Spectrophotometric Standard Stars , 1990 .

[18]  Alberto Fernández-Soto,et al.  Star-forming galaxies at very high redshifts , 1996, Nature.