Differentiation and Customer Decoupling Points: Key Value Enablers for Mass Customization

Mass customization draws a twofold benefit: cost reduction, inherited from mass production techniques, and good response to customers’ requirements, inherited from customization. Two main decisions, relevant to design and manufacturing, are required for proper implementation of mass customization. Firstly, product features should be split between standard and customizable ones. This will position the differentiation points. Secondly, processes should be split between Make-to-Stock and Make-to-order. This will position the customer-order decoupling point. The impact of these 2 criteria on enterprise and customer value will be evaluated through the creation of a generic causal diagram. Following, a real case study on ALPINA industries is simulated and analyzed. The computational results highlight the joint impact of the two decisions on the overall performance. Hence, the results advocate that these two levers should then be considered, simultaneously, when implementing mass customization.

[1]  Joanna Daaboul,et al.  Design for mass customization: Product variety vs. process variety , 2011 .

[2]  Xiao-Feng Shao,et al.  Evaluation of postponement strategies in mass customization with service guarantees , 2008 .

[3]  Ji Jian-hua,et al.  Study on CODP Position of Process Industry Implemented Mass Customization , 2007 .

[4]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  Using the Information Decoupling Point to Improve Supply Chain Performance , 1999 .

[5]  Kikuo Fujita,et al.  Mathematical model for simultaneous design of module commonalization and supply chain configuration toward global product family , 2013, J. Intell. Manuf..

[6]  Gilvan C. Souza,et al.  Delayed Differentiation for Multiple Lifecycle Products , 2013 .

[7]  Jian Chen,et al.  Postponed product differentiation with demand information update , 2013 .

[8]  Pandu R. Tadikamalla,et al.  Customization: Impact on Product and Process Performance , 2005 .

[9]  W. Zinn,et al.  PLANNING PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF POSTPONEMENT , 1988 .

[10]  D. Shunk,et al.  Comprehensive framework for the development of a supply chain strategy , 2006 .

[11]  V. Donk Make to stock or make to order: the decoupling point in the food processing industries , 2001 .

[12]  Joanna Daaboul,et al.  Extended value network modelling and simulation for mass customization implementation , 2012, J. Intell. Manuf..

[13]  Joanna Daaboul,et al.  Value of personalized products: modelling the customer perception , 2011 .

[14]  A. Bernard,et al.  Value network modelling and simulation for strategic analysis: a discrete event simulation approach , 2014 .

[15]  Joanna Daaboul,et al.  Value networks: pulling the triggers. A combined approach of modelling and simulation for performance evaluation , 2014, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[16]  Mark Ferguson,et al.  Evaluation of postponement structures to accommodate mass customization , 2005 .

[17]  Jan Olhager,et al.  Strategic positioning of the order penetration point , 2003 .