A Region in Domain II of the Urokinase Receptor Required for Urokinase Binding*

The urokinase receptor is composed of three homologous domains based on disulfide spacing. The contribution of each domain to the binding and activation of single chain urokinase (scuPA) remains poorly understood. In the present paper we examined the role of domain II (DII) in these processes. Repositioning DII to the amino or carboxyl terminus of the molecule abolished binding of scuPA as did deleting the domain entirely. By using alanine-scanning mutagenesis, we identified a 9-amino acid continuous sequence in DII (Arg137–Arg145) required for both activities. Competition-inhibition and surface plasmon resonance studies demonstrated that mutation of Lys139 and His143 to alanine in soluble receptor (suPAR) reduced the affinity for scuPA ∼5-fold due to an increase in the “off rate.” Mutation of Arg137, Arg142, and Arg145, each to alanine, leads to an ∼100-fold decrease in affinity attributable to a 10-fold decrease in the apparent “on rate” and a 6-fold increase in off rate. These differences were confirmed on cells expressing variant urokinase receptor. suPAR-K139A/H143A displayed a 50% reduction in scuPA-mediated plasminogen activation activity, whereas the 3-arginine variant was unable to stimulate scuPA activity at all. Mutation of the three arginines did not affect binding of a decamer peptide antagonist of scuPA known to interact with DI and DIII. However, this mutation abolished both the binding of soluble DI to DII–III in the presence of scuPA and the synergistic activation of scuPA mediated by DI and wild type DII–DIII. These data show that DII is required for high affinity binding of scuPA and its activation. DII does not serve merely as a spacer function but appears to be required for interdomain cooperativity.

[1]  L. Ossowski,et al.  Reduction in Surface Urokinase Receptor Forces Malignant Cells into a Protracted State of Dormancy , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  L. Lund,et al.  Urokinase plasminogen activator cleaves its cell surface receptor releasing the ligand-binding domain. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[3]  F. Blasi,et al.  Removal of domain D2 or D3 of the human urokinase receptor does not affect ligand affinity , 1996, FEBS letters.

[4]  D. Cines,et al.  Carboxy-terminal processing of the urokinase receptor: implications for substrate recognition and glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor addition. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[5]  N. Mackman,et al.  Requirement of Receptor-bound Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator for Integrin αvβ5-directed Cell Migration* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  O. Mayboroda,et al.  The Jak/Stat Pathway and Urokinase Receptor Signaling in Human Aortic Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  P. Hufnagl,et al.  Urokinase Receptor Is Associated with the Components of the JAK1/STAT1 Signaling Pathway and Leads to Activation of This Pathway upon Receptor Clustering in the Human Kidney Epithelial Tumor Cell Line TCL-598* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  M. Ploug,et al.  Photoaffinity labeling of the human receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator using a decapeptide antagonist. Evidence for a composite ligand-binding site and a short interdomain separation. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[9]  K. Danø,et al.  Domain Interplay in the Urokinase Receptor , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  M. Ploug,et al.  Structure—function relationships in the receptor for urokinase‐type plasminogen activator Comparison to other members of the Ly‐6 family and snake venom α‐neurotoxins , 1994 .

[11]  F. Vogel,et al.  Urokinase-induced mitogenesis is mediated by casein kinase 2 and nucleolin , 1999, Current Biology.

[12]  D G Myszka,et al.  Kinetic analysis of macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance biosensors. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[13]  A. Mazar,et al.  Soluble Human Urokinase Receptor Is Composed of Two Active Units* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  Michael V. Doyle,et al.  Regulation of Integrin Function by the Urokinase Receptor , 1996, Science.

[15]  M. Ploug,et al.  Mapping Part of the Functional Epitope for Ligand Binding on the Receptor for Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator by Site-directed Mutagenesis* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  A. Mazar,et al.  Plasminogen activation by pro-urokinase in complex with its receptor--dependence on a tripeptide (Spectrozyme plasmin). , 1997, European journal of biochemistry.

[17]  Y. Cheng,et al.  Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. , 1973, Biochemical pharmacology.

[18]  F. España,et al.  Two Distinct Urokinase-Serpin Interactions Regulate the Initiation of Cell Surface-associated Plasminogen Activation* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  F. Blasi,et al.  Proteolytic cleavage of the urokinase receptor substitutes for the agonist‐induced chemotactic effect. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[20]  M. Oda,et al.  Analysis of the ternary complex formation of human urokinase with the separated two domains of its receptor. , 1998, European journal of biochemistry.

[21]  K. Preissner,et al.  The dual role of the urokinase receptor system in pericellular proteolysis and cell adhesion: implications for cardiovascular function , 1999, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[22]  M. Ploug Identification of specific sites involved in ligand binding by photoaffinity labeling of the receptor for the urokinase-type plasminogen activator. Residues located at equivalent positions in uPAR domains I and III participate in the assembly of a composite ligand-binding site. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[23]  Bo Johnsson,et al.  Comparison of methods for immobilization to carboxymethyl dextran sensor surfaces by analysis of the specific activity of monoclonal antibodies , 1995, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[24]  K. Preissner,et al.  Urokinase Receptor (CD87) Regulates Leukocyte Recruitment via β2 Integrins In Vivo , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[25]  F. Blasi,et al.  Cellular receptor for urokinase plasminogen activator. Carboxyl-terminal processing and membrane anchoring by glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[26]  B. Bouma,et al.  Lysine-Binding Heterogeneity of Lp(a): Consequences for Fibrin Binding and Inhibition of Plasminogen Activation , 1992, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[27]  J. Henkin,et al.  Enhancement of the Enzymatic Activity of Single-chain Urokinase Plasminogen Activator by Soluble Urokinase Receptor (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  B. Chong,et al.  Further characterization of antibody and antigen in heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia , 1999, British journal of haematology.

[29]  Jj Pollanen The N-terminal domain of human urokinase receptor contains two distinct regions critical for ligand recognition. , 1993 .

[30]  H. Harper,et al.  Urokinase receptor (CD87) aggregation triggers phosphoinositide hydrolysis and intracellular calcium mobilization in mononuclear phagocytes. , 1999, Journal of immunology.