Component Swapping Modularity for Distributed Precision Contouring

Prior works use numerical simulations to verify component swapping modularity (CSM) for various systems. Moreover, current CSM algorithms do not investigate control parameter allocation for a realistic control configuration when the control consists of multiple parts. Thus, this work primarily focuses on presenting and experimentally validating an empirical methodology to allocate and calibrate various parts of the controller to improve CSM in a precision multiaxis servo-system. As a secondary contribution, the concept of the modified reference contour is introduced to simplify control allocation and to improve the modularity of the cross-coupling control (CCC), which is utilized to achieve high-precision contouring. First, the unified linear CCC algorithm is presented for multiaxis servo-systems. Initially, the sensitivity of the contouring algorithm versus the control parameters is studied numerically. Then, empirical calibration and sensitivity analysis are conducted to obtain the optimal set of control parameters. Hence, the lowest feasible contour error is obtained for possible configurations of the servo-system. It is shown that the results of the empirical analysis are consistent with those of the numerical analysis. Despite dramatic differences between the servo-system variants, experimental results show that full CSM is achieved with the same controller for the variants of the servo-system.

[1]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  Throttle actuator swapping modularity design for idle speed control , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[2]  N. Matsui,et al.  Disturbance observer-based nonlinear friction compensation in table drive system , 1998, AMC'98 - Coimbra. 1998 5th International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control. Proceedings (Cat. No.98TH8354).

[3]  Yi Hu,et al.  Design of distributed cross-coupled controller based on motion control bus , 2009, 2009 Chinese Control and Decision Conference.

[4]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  Distributed Supervisory Controller Design for Battery Swapping Modularity in Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2012 .

[5]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  Experimental verification of component swapping modularity for precision contouring , 2017, 2017 American Control Conference (ACC).

[6]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  Design of distributed controllers for component swapping modularity using linear matrix inequalities , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM).

[7]  I. V. Kolmanovsky,et al.  Direct Optimal Design for Component Swapping Modularity in Control Systems , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[8]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  Improving Component-Swapping Modularity Using Bidirectional Communication in Networked Control Systems , 2009, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[9]  Pau-Lo Hsu,et al.  CAN-based motion control design , 2003, SICE 2003 Annual Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8734).

[10]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  Swappable Distributed MIMO Controller for a VCT Engine , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[11]  Yoram Koren,et al.  Cross-Coupled Biaxial Computer Control for Manufacturing Systems , 1980 .

[12]  Wen-Hua Chen,et al.  Disturbance observer based control for nonlinear systems , 2004, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[13]  Yoram Koren,et al.  Variable-Gain Cross-Coupling Controller for Contouring , 1991 .

[14]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  Dynamic Contour Error Estimation and Feedback Modification for High-Precision Contouring , 2016, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.