Uncertainty Reduction as a Measure of Cognitive Processing Effort

The amount of cognitive effort required to process a word has been argued to depend on the word's effect on the uncertainty about the incoming sentence, as quantified by the entropy over sentence probabilities. The current paper tests this hypothesis more thoroughly than has been done before by using recurrent neural networks for entropy-reduction estimation. A comparison between these estimates and word-reading times shows that entropy reduction is positively related to processing effort, confirming the entropy-reduction hypothesis. This effect is independent from the effect of surprisal.

[1]  John Hale,et al.  A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model , 2001, NAACL.

[2]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .

[3]  Nathaniel J. Smith,et al.  Optimal Processing Times in Reading: A Formal Model and Empirical Investigation , 2008 .

[4]  Frank Keller,et al.  Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity , 2008, Cognition.

[5]  Stefan L. Frank,et al.  Surprisal-based comparison between a symbolic and a connectionist model of sentence processing , 2009 .

[6]  S. Frank,et al.  Insensitivity of the Human Sentence-Processing System to Hierarchical Structure , 2011, Psychological science.

[7]  John Hale,et al.  Uncertainty About the Rest of the Sentence , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the Potsdam Sentence Corpus , 2008, Journal of Eye Movement Research.

[9]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading , 2005, Vision Research.

[10]  R. Levy Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[11]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  A Usage-Based Approach to Recursion in Sentence Processing , 2009 .

[12]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[13]  John Hale,et al.  The Information Conveyed by Words in Sentences , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[14]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  Brian Roark,et al.  Deriving lexical and syntactic expectation-based measures for psycholinguistic modeling via incremental top-down parsing , 2009, EMNLP.

[16]  Beatrice Santorini,et al.  Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank , 1993, CL.