Response of foraging sheep to variability in the spatial distribution of resources

In stable and predictable environments, grazing herbivores can use spatial memory to increase foraging efficiency. As most natural systems are characterized by unpredictability in the distribution of resources, we explored the foraging efficiency of sheep, Ovis aries, in relation to variability in spatial distribution of resources, predicting that as the environment became more variable, spatial memory would be replaced by sampling behaviour. We manipulated resource distribution by using bowls of food pellets to create seven preferred resource sites within a grass pasture. The provisioning of the bowls with pellets and the mass of pellets therein were altered to create four treatments in which resources remained stable or varied within and between resource sites. Where bowl position was predictable, sheep showed increased foraging efficiency by reducing the time devoted to pellet foraging in relation to the total mass of pellets consumed and by visiting fewer empty bowls while searching within a site. Where bowl position became less predictable, sheep increased sampling within sites, visiting more empty bowls before leaving a site. However, in contrast with previous observations, sheep did not return preferentially to the highest-quality sites within the test plot. This study suggests that sheep could use spatial memory at small spatial scales to improve foraging efficiency where resource distribution is predictable. The ability to switch between foraging tactics may allow sheep to maintain foraging success under variable conditions.

[1]  H. D. Patterson,et al.  Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal , 1971 .

[2]  John Lazarus,et al.  An information primacy model of exploratory and foraging behaviour , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  R. W. Richards,et al.  Characteristics of spatial memory in cattle , 1989 .

[4]  E. Charnov Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[5]  F. Bunnell,et al.  Effects of learning on food selection and searching behaviour of deer , 1989 .

[6]  C. Scott,et al.  Dietary Habits and Social Interactions Affect Choice of Feeding Location by Sheep , 1995 .

[7]  M. Westoby What are the Biological Bases of Varied Diets? , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[8]  Comparative foraging strategies of sheep and goats in a T-maze apparatus , 1995 .

[9]  K. Risenhoover,et al.  Effects of resource distribution, patch spacing, and preharvest information on foraging decisions of northern bobwhites , 1998 .

[10]  PETER A BEDNEKOFF,et al.  Clark's nutcracker spatial memory: many errors might not be due to forgetting , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  B. Dumont,et al.  An indoor method for studying the preferences of sheep and cattle at pasture , 1995 .

[12]  A. Boissy,et al.  Grazing behaviour of sheep in a situation of conflict between feeding and social motivations , 2000, Behavioural Processes.

[13]  R. Hughes Behavioural Mechanisms of Food Selection , 1990, NATO ASI Series.

[14]  D. Dwyer,et al.  Feeding Stations of Sheep as an Indicator of Diminished Forage Supply , 1985 .

[15]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Influence of Conspecific Attraction on the Spatial Distribution of Learning Foragers in a Patchy Habitat. , 1997 .

[16]  A. Sibbald,et al.  Trade-offs between social behaviour and foraging by sheep in heterogeneous pastures , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[17]  J. Kagel,et al.  When foragers discount the future: constraint or adaptation? , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  N. West Rangelands in a sustainable biosphere , 1996 .

[19]  Derek W. Bailey,et al.  Large Herbivore Foraging and Ecological HierarchiesLandscape ecology can enhance traditional foraging theory , 1987 .

[20]  G. W. Snedecor Statistical Methods , 1964 .

[21]  E. Laca Spatial memory and food searching mechanisms of cattle , 1998 .

[22]  Emilio A. Laca,et al.  The importance of scale of patchiness for selectivity in grazing herbivores , 1999, Oecologia.

[23]  I. Gordon,et al.  Constraints on Diet Selection and Foraging Behaviour in Mammalian Herbivores , 1990 .

[24]  David R. C. Hill,et al.  Multi-agent simulation of group foraging in sheep: effects of spatial memory, conspecific attraction and plot size , 2001 .

[25]  Association of relative food availabilities and locations by cattle. , 1989 .

[26]  A. Lawrence,et al.  Influence of social behaviour on utilization of supplemental feedblocks by Scottish hill sheep , 1988 .

[27]  Anthony J. Parsons,et al.  The use of spatial memory by grazing animals to locate food patches in spatially heterogeneous environments: an example with sheep , 1996 .

[28]  B. Dumont,et al.  Spatial memory of sheep at pasture , 1998 .

[29]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  Searching in patches by European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris , 1997, Behavioural Processes.

[30]  Lindsey Hewitson,et al.  The foraging behaviour of sheep in response to environmental uncertainty , 2002 .

[31]  R. W. Richards,et al.  Foraging strategies of cattle in a Y-maze: influence of food availability , 1995 .