Morphogenesis at criticality

Significance Biological networks are described by many parameters, and the behavior of a network is qualitatively different (monostable, bistable, oscillating, etc.) in different parts of parameter space. Critical points and surfaces are the borders between such qualitatively different regimes, as with phase transitions in equilibrium thermodynamics. We argue that, as expected from the thermodynamic case, genetic regulatory networks should exhibit behaviors near criticality that are independent of most molecular details. Analyzing recent experiments on the gap gene network in the early Drosophila embryo, we find that these signatures of criticality can be seen, quantitatively. This raises the question of why evolution has tuned this network to such a special point in its parameter space. Spatial patterns in the early fruit fly embryo emerge from a network of interactions among transcription factors, the gap genes, driven by maternal inputs. Such networks can exhibit many qualitatively different behaviors, separated by critical surfaces. At criticality, we should observe strong correlations in the fluctuations of different genes around their mean expression levels, a slowing of the dynamics along some but not all directions in the space of possible expression levels, correlations of expression fluctuations over long distances in the embryo, and departures from a Gaussian distribution of these fluctuations. Analysis of recent experiments on the gap gene network shows that all these signatures are observed, and that the different signatures are related in ways predicted by theory. Although there might be other explanations for these individual phenomena, the confluence of evidence suggests that this genetic network is tuned to criticality.

[1]  Juliane Junker,et al.  The Making Of A Fly The Genetics Of Animal Design , 2016 .

[2]  R. Horgan,et al.  Statistical Field Theory , 2014 .

[3]  Yoosik Kim,et al.  Context-dependent transcriptional interpretation of mitogen activated protein kinase signaling in the Drosophila embryo. , 2013, Chaos.

[4]  Julien O. Dubuis,et al.  Accurate measurements of dynamics and reproducibility in small genetic networks , 2013, Molecular systems biology.

[5]  Gasper Tkacik,et al.  Positional information, in bits , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  W. Bialek Biophysics: Searching for Principles , 2012 .

[7]  W. Bialek,et al.  Optimizing information flow in small genetic networks. III. A self-interacting gene. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  W. Bialek,et al.  Are Biological Systems Poised at Criticality? , 2010, 1012.2242.

[9]  Johannes Jaeger,et al.  Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences REVIEW The gap gene network , 2022 .

[10]  W. Bialek,et al.  Optimizing information flow in small genetic networks. II. Feed-forward interactions. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Gasper Tkacik,et al.  Optimizing information flow in small genetic networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  W. Bialek,et al.  Information flow and optimization in transcriptional regulation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  W. Bialek,et al.  Probing the Limits to Positional Information , 2007, Cell.

[14]  Terence Hwa,et al.  Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: models. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[15]  David H. Sharp,et al.  Dynamic control of positional information in the early Drosophila embryo , 2004, Nature.

[16]  Thomas Lecuit,et al.  slam encodes a developmental regulator of polarized membrane growth during cleavage of the Drosophila embryo. , 2002, Developmental cell.

[17]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Computational studies of gene regulatory networks: in numero molecular biology , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[18]  J. Collins,et al.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli , 2000, Nature.

[19]  D. Baylor,et al.  Single-photon detection by rod cells of the retina , 1998 .

[20]  David M. Raup,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[21]  J. Gerhart,et al.  Cells, Embryos and Evolution , 1997 .

[22]  E. Bonabeau How nature works: The science of self-organized criticality (copernicus) , 1997 .

[23]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organised Criticality , 1997 .

[24]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works , 1996 .

[25]  Mike Rothe,et al.  Identical transacting factor requirement for knirps and knirps-related gene expression in the anterior but not in the posterior region of the Drosophila embryo , 1994, Mechanisms of Development.

[26]  P. Lawrence Drosophila Unfolded. (Book Reviews: The Making of a Fly. The Genetics of Animal Design.) , 1992 .

[27]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Gene expression mediated by cis‐acting sequences of the Krüppel gene in response to the Drosophila morphogens bicoid and hunchback. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[28]  Detlef Weigel,et al.  Regulation of Krüppel expression in the anlage of the Malpighian tubules in the Drosophila embryo , 1990, Mechanisms of Development.

[29]  M Hoch,et al.  cis‐acting control elements for Krüppel expression in the Drosophila embryo. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[30]  Claude Desplan,et al.  The products of the Drosophila gap genes hunchback and Krüppel bind to the hunchback promoters , 1989, Nature.

[31]  R. Lehmann,et al.  Cross-regulatory interactions among the gap genes of Drosophila , 1986, Nature.

[32]  P. Holmes,et al.  Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields , 1983, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[33]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila , 1980, Nature.

[34]  H. Berg,et al.  Physics of chemoreception. , 1977, Biophysical journal.

[35]  L. Wolpert Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  A. M. Turing,et al.  The chemical basis of morphogenesis , 1952, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.