Whole-body patterns of the range of joint motion in young adults: masculine type and feminine type

BackgroundUnderstanding the whole-body patterns of joint flexibility and their related biological and physical factors contributes not only to clinical assessments but also to the fields of human factors and ergonomics. In this study, ranges of motion (ROMs) at limb and trunk joints of young adults were analysed to understand covariation patterns of different joint motions and to identify factors associated with the variation in ROM.MethodsSeventy-eight healthy volunteers (42 males and 36 females) living on Okinawa Island, Japan, were recruited. Passive ROM was measured at multiple joints through the whole body (31 measurements) including the left and right side limbs and trunk.ResultsComparisons between males and females, dominant and non-dominant sides, and antagonistic motions indicated that body structures influence ROMs. In principal component analysis (PCA) on the ROM data, the first principal component (PC1) represented the sex difference and a similar covariation pattern appeared in the analysis within each sex. Multiple regression analysis showed that this component was associated with sex, age, body fat %, iliospinale height, and leg extension strength.ConclusionsThe present study identified that there is a spectrum of “masculine” and “feminine” types in the whole-body patterns of joint flexibility. This study also suggested that body proportion and composition, muscle mass and strength, and possibly skeletal structures partly explain such patterns. These results would be important to understand individual variation in susceptibility to joint injuries and diseases and in one’s suitable and effective postures and motions.

[1]  Demographic and anthropometric factors affecting elbow range of motion in healthy adults. , 2013, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[2]  R A Oostendorp,et al.  Range of joint motion and disability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. , 2000, Rheumatology.

[3]  W. Wallace,et al.  Femoral anteversion in healthy children. Application of a new method using ultrasound. , 1990, Journal of anatomy.

[4]  S. Azen,et al.  Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  H. S. Amonoo-Kuofi,et al.  Changes in the lumbosacral angle, sacral inclination and the curvature of the lumbar spine during aging. , 1992, Acta anatomica.

[6]  J. Nyland,et al.  Femoral anteversion influences vastus medialis and gluteus medius EMG amplitude: composite hip abductor EMG amplitude ratios during isometric combined hip abduction-external rotation. , 2004, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[7]  K. Roach,et al.  Normal hip and knee active range of motion: the relationship to age. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[8]  O. J. Björnsson,et al.  Normal range of joint movements in shoulder, hip, wrist and thumb with special reference to side: a comparison between two populations. , 1974, International journal of epidemiology.

[9]  A W Parker,et al.  Active and Passive Mobility of Lower Limb Joints in Elderly Men and Women , 1989, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[10]  J. Soucie,et al.  Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies , 2011, Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia.

[11]  J. Kaprio,et al.  Heritability of lumbar flexibility and the role of disc degeneration and body weight. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  A.Brigitte Demes,et al.  Anthropologie. Handbuch der vergleichenden biologie des menschen , 1991 .

[13]  H Watanabe,et al.  [The range of joint motions of the extremities in healthy Japanese people--the difference according to the age (author's transl)]. , 1979, Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai zasshi.

[14]  L. J. Chapman,et al.  The measurement of foot preference , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  S. Suzuki,et al.  ANTHROPOMETRY AND BODY COMPOSITION OF JAPANESE YOUNG MEN AND WOMEN. , 1964, Human biology.

[16]  J. M. Walker,et al.  Active mobility of the extremities in older subjects. , 1984, Physical therapy.

[17]  D. Paterson,et al.  Flexibility of Older Adults Aged 55–86 Years and the Influence of Physical Activity , 2013, Journal of aging research.

[18]  L. Macedo,et al.  Differences in range of motion between dominant and nondominant sides of upper and lower extremities. , 2008, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[19]  Filip Leszko,et al.  In Vivo Normal Knee Kinematics: Is Ethnicity or Gender an Influencing Factor? , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  Anand Panchal,et al.  Loss of total arc of motion in collegiate baseball players. , 2006, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[21]  J. Morrow,et al.  Lumbar Spine Flexion and Extension Extremes of Motion in Women of Different Age and Racial Groups: The WIN Study , 2010, Spine.

[22]  Katsumi Mita,et al.  Age-related changes in the interactive mobility of the hip and knee joints: a geometrical analysis. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[23]  Glenohumeral Range of Motion and Lower Extremity Flexibility in Collegiate-Level Baseball Players , 2012, Sports health.

[24]  D. Hopper,et al.  An evaluation of differences in hip external rotation strength and range of motion between female dancers and non-dancers , 2004, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[25]  J. Ravlić-Gulan,et al.  Femoral anteversion related to side differences in hip rotation. Passive rotation in 1,140 children aged 8-9 years. , 1997, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[26]  A. Keys,et al.  SKINFOLD DISTRIBUTIONS IN MIDDLE‐AGED AMERICAN MEN: A CONTRIBUTION TO NORMS OF LEANNESS‐FATNESS * , 1963, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Meng-Jung Chung,et al.  The effect of age and gender on joint range of motion of worker population in Taiwan , 2009 .

[28]  Amonoo-Kuofi Hs.  Changes in the lumbosacral angle, sacral inclination and the curvature of the lumbar spine during aging. , 1992 .

[29]  D. Wescott,et al.  Temporal trends in femoral diaphyseal torsional asymmetry among the Arikara associated with postural behavior. , 2014, American journal of physical anthropology.

[30]  Mohammad R Fotoohabadi,et al.  Kinematics of Rising From a Chair: Image-Based Analysis of the Sagittal Hip-Spine Movement Pattern in Elderly People Who Are Healthy , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[31]  S. Seber,et al.  Normal Range of Motion of the Joints of the Upper Extremity in Male Subjects, with Special Reference to Side* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[32]  L. Macedo,et al.  Effects of age on passive range of motion of selected peripheral joints in healthy adult females , 2009, Physiotherapy theory and practice.

[33]  N. Sugano,et al.  Gender differences in 3D morphology and bony impingement of human hips , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[34]  E. Arendt,et al.  Knee Injury Patterns Among Men and Women in Collegiate Basketball and Soccer , 1995, The American journal of sports medicine.

[35]  D. Golden,et al.  Body Mass Index and Elbow Range of Motion in a Healthy Pediatric Population: A Possible Mechanism of Overweight in Children , 2008, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[36]  T. Terjesen,et al.  Femoral anteversion in normal adults. Ultrasound measurements in 50 men and 50 women. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.