Added value of fetal MRI in fetuses with suspected brain abnormalities on neurosonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the additional diagnostic value of fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in fetuses with suspected brain abnormalities identified with advanced neurosonography (NS). Methods: A systematic literature search was performed for studies reporting on a comparison between diagnosis with NS and MRI, in fetuses suspected for brain abnormalities. Abnormalities detected on NS were compared with those detected on MRI as well as with postnatal imaging findings to assess the added value of fetal MRI. Results: We included 27 articles, reporting on 1184 cases in which NS and MRI diagnosis were compared. In 65% of cases [773/1184] fetal NS and fetal MRI diagnosis agreed completely. In 23% [312/1184], MRI showed additional or different pathology. In 8% [99/1184], MRI rejected the NS diagnosis with normal brain as conclusion. For 454 cases a comparison with postnatal imaging could be made. Compared to the postnatal diagnosis, fetal MRI diagnosis agreed completely in 80% [364/454] and fetal NS in 54% [243/454] (difference 27%, 95% CI 21–33%). Additional abnormalities were found on postnatal imaging in 36% [164/454] after NS and in 14% [61/454] after fetal MRI. Conclusions: This meta-analysis shows that fetal MRI in addition to NS improves diagnostic accuracy in detecting brain abnormalities.

[1]  W. Leung,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain. , 2016, Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi.

[2]  F Prefumo,et al.  Additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature , 2014, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[3]  A. Righini,et al.  Response to “Is fetal magnetic resonance imaging indicated when ultrasound isolated mild ventriculomegaly is present in pregnancies with no risk factors?” , 2014, Prenatal diagnosis.

[4]  M. Recio,et al.  Fetal magnetic resonance imaging and neurosonography in congenital neurological anomalies: supplementary diagnostic and postnatal prognostic value , 2013, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[5]  T. Huisman,et al.  Impact of fetal magnetic resonance imaging on the management of fetal ventriculomegaly: Evaluation of 38 cases with an included synopsis , 2012, Journal of Pediatric Neuroradiology.

[6]  A. Righini,et al.  Is fetal magnetic resonance imaging indicated when ultrasound isolated mild ventriculomegaly is present in pregnancies with no risk factors? , 2012, Prenatal diagnosis.

[7]  P. Griffiths,et al.  The Use of In Utero MR Imaging to Delineate Developmental Brain Abnormalities in Multifetal Pregnancies , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[8]  Iman A Hosny,et al.  Ultrafast MRI of the fetus: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  E. Schiff,et al.  Value of prenatal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of congenital primary cytomegalovirus infection , 2010, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[10]  O. Axelsson,et al.  The clinical impact of fetal magnetic resonance imaging on management of CNS anomalies in the second trimester of pregnancy , 2010, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[11]  P. Peruzzi,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography for the in utero evaluation of central nervous system anomalies. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics.

[12]  A. Righini,et al.  Early cerebral lesions in cytomegalovirus infection: prenatal MR imaging. , 2010, Radiology.

[13]  P D Griffiths,et al.  A Prospective Study of Fetuses with Isolated Ventriculomegaly Investigated by Antenatal Sonography and In Utero MR Imaging , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[14]  D. Blondin,et al.  Fetal MRI of the central nervous system: clinical relevance , 2009, Child's Nervous System.

[15]  R. Rajeswaran,et al.  Ultrasound versus MRI in the diagnosis of fetal head and trunk anomalies , 2009, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[16]  T. Reihs,et al.  Das fetale MRT in der pränatalen Beurteilung von ZNS-Störungen , 2008, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[17]  L. Chitty,et al.  Foetal brain imaging: ultrasound or MRI. A comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and a dedicated multidisciplinary neurosonographic opinion , 2008, Acta paediatrica.

[18]  D. Levine,et al.  What Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Add to the Prenatal Sonographic Diagnosis of Ventriculomegaly? , 2007, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[19]  J. Morris,et al.  In utero magnetic resonance of non-isolated ventriculomegaly: Does ventricular size or morphology reflect pathology? , 2006, Clinical radiology.

[20]  Yu-xiang Ma,et al.  Fetal central nervous system anomalies: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography for diagnosis. , 2006, Chinese medical journal.

[21]  C. Garel,et al.  Third‐trimester fetal MRI in isolated 10‐ to 12‐mm ventriculomegaly: is it worth it? , 2006, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[22]  D. Prayer,et al.  The Clinical Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fetuses with Central Nervous System Anomalies on Ultrasound Scan , 2005, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[23]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in 100 singleton pregnancies with suspected brain abnormalities , 2004, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[24]  D. Lev,et al.  Fetal brain imaging: a comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and dedicated neurosonography , 2004, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[25]  M. Kilby,et al.  Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system abnormalities: 3-year experience , 2002, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[26]  M. Shakudo,et al.  Fast MR imaging and ultrafast MR imaging of fetal central nervous system abnormalities. , 2001, Osaka city medical journal.

[27]  G. Sebag,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetus , 1998, Pediatric Radiology.

[28]  C. Adamsbaum,et al.  [Prenatal MRI of the brain. Retrospective study apropos of 34 tests]. , 1997, Journal de radiologie.

[29]  P. Spagnolo,et al.  La risonanza magnetica del feto , 1994 .

[30]  E. T. Tali,et al.  MR of fetal central nervous system abnormalities. , 1994, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[31]  N. Girard,et al.  Prenatal diagnosis of fetal cerebral abnormalities by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. , 1993, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[32]  Gerta Rucker,et al.  Bmc Medical Research Methodology Open Access the Relationship between Quality of Research and Citation Frequency , 2022 .