Digital twins in agri-food : Societal and ethical themes and questions for further research

ABSTRACT Digital Twins are computational representations of both living and non-living entities and processes, which can be used to analyse and simulate interventions in these entities and processes. When developing Digital Twins, it is important to anticipate on the societal, ethical and safety impacts they may have. Since in the agri-food domain Digital Twins are still in its infancy, it is possible to include societal values from the beginning onwards, during the research and development process. In this paper, we present four themes (i.e. resources, representations, actions and implementations) to organise the anticipation of and reflection on potential impacts of Digital Twins in the agri-food domain. Using insights from the smart farming literature, we assess for each theme which issues and questions require further research and attention, in order to develop an agenda for responsible research and innovation on Digital Twins.

[1]  M. Bogaardt,et al.  Identifying key ethical debates for autonomous robots in agri-food: a research agenda , 2021, AI and Ethics.

[2]  Cara A. Stitzlein,et al.  Foresighting Australian digital agricultural futures: Applying responsible innovation thinking to anticipate research and development impact under different scenarios , 2021 .

[3]  P. Verboven,et al.  Digital twins of food process operations: the next step for food process models? , 2020 .

[4]  Kelly Bronson,et al.  The future(s) of digital agriculture and sustainable food systems: An analysis of high-level policy documents , 2020 .

[5]  H. Barrett,et al.  Perceptions of the Fourth Agricultural Revolution: What’s In, What’s Out, and What Consequences are Anticipated? , 2020, Sociologia Ruralis.

[6]  L. Wiseman,et al.  Trust in farm data sharing: reflections on the EU code of conduct for agricultural data sharing , 2020, Ethics and Information Technology.

[7]  Mark Ryan,et al.  In AI We Trust: Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, and Reliability , 2020, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[8]  B. Mallard,et al.  Resilience of High Immune Response (HIR) Genetics in the Context of Climate Change: Effects of Heat Stress on Cattle with Diverse Immune Response Genotypes , 2020, The Journal of Immunology.

[9]  Chrysanthi Charatsari,et al.  Smart farming and short food supply chains: Are they compatible? , 2020 .

[10]  Louise Wright,et al.  How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin , 2020, Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences.

[11]  Louise Wright,et al.  How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin , 2020, Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences.

[12]  Jason Yon,et al.  Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review , 2020, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology.

[13]  Matthew Kearnes,et al.  The promise of precision: datafication in medicine, agriculture and education , 2020 .

[14]  S. Wolfert,et al.  Ethics of smart farming: Current questions and directions for responsible innovation towards the future , 2019, NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences.

[15]  Airong Zhang,et al.  Farmers and their data: An examination of farmers’ reluctance to share their data through the lens of the laws impacting smart farming , 2019, NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences.

[16]  Claire M. Mason,et al.  “If they don’t tell us what they do with it, why would we trust them?” Trust, transparency and benefit-sharing in Smart Farming , 2019, NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences.

[17]  C. Eastwood,et al.  Managing Socio-Ethical Challenges in the Development of Smart Farming: From a Fragmented to a Comprehensive Approach for Responsible Research and Innovation , 2019 .

[18]  Thijs Defraeye,et al.  Digital twins probe into food cooling and biochemical quality changes for reducing losses in refrigerated supply chains , 2019, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[19]  Fabio Lima,et al.  A digital twin for smart farming , 2019, 2019 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC).

[20]  Marinus Ossewaarde,et al.  Digital transformation and the renewal of social theory: Unpacking the new fraudulent myths and misplaced metaphors , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[21]  V. Blok.  From participation to interruption: toward an ethics of stakeholder engagement, participation and partnership in corporate social responsibility and responsible innovation , 2019, International Handbook on Responsible Innovation.

[22]  L. Wiseman,et al.  Empowering farmers by resolving the trust and legal issues emerging from precision farming , 2019, Precision agriculture ’19.

[23]  Kelly Bronson,et al.  Looking through a responsible innovation lens at uneven engagements with digital farming , 2019, NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences.

[24]  Ryan Mark,et al.  Ethics of Using AI and Big Data in Agriculture: The Case of a Large Agriculture Multinational , 2019, The ORBIT Journal.

[25]  P. Feindt,et al.  The Quantified Animal: Precision Livestock Farming and the Ethical Implications of Objectification , 2018, Food Ethics.

[26]  M. Carolan.  ‘Smart’ Farming Techniques as Political Ontology: Access, Sovereignty and the Performance of Neoliberal and Not‐So‐Neoliberal Worlds , 2018 .

[27]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Datafication and data fiction: Narrating data and narrating with data , 2018, Big Data Soc..

[28]  Charles Fox,et al.  Legal framework for small autonomous agricultural robots , 2018, AI & SOCIETY.

[29]  Chris Addison,et al.  Digital and Data-Driven Agriculture: Harnessing the Power of Data for Smallholders , 2018 .

[30]  Bruce V. Taylor,et al.  Is big data for big farming or for everyone? Perceptions in the Australian grains industry , 2018, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[31]  Ophir Vermesh,et al.  Toward achieving precision health , 2018, Science Translational Medicine.

[32]  Kelly Bronson,et al.  Smart Farming: Including Rights Holders for Responsible Agricultural Innovation , 2018 .

[33]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  Digital Twins in Health Care: Ethical Implications of an Emerging Engineering Paradigm , 2018, Front. Genet..

[34]  V. Ratten.  Social entrepreneurship through digital communication in farming , 2018 .

[35]  Katharina Witterhold.  Political consumers as digital food activists , 2017 .

[36]  Andreas Kamilaris,et al.  A review on the practice of big data analysis in agriculture , 2017, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[37]  Thomas Bartzanas,et al.  Internet of Things in agriculture, recent advances and future challenges , 2017 .

[38]  S. Żakowska-Biemans,et al.  Free Range, Organic? Polish Consumers Preferences Regarding Information on Farming System and Nutritional Enhancement of Eggs: A Discrete Choice Based Experiment , 2017 .

[39]  Zara Rahman,et al.  Responsible Data in Agriculture , 2017 .

[40]  Luca Leone.  Beyond Connectivity: The Internet of Food Architecture Between Ethics and the EU Citizenry , 2017 .

[41]  J. Beer.  Ownership of Open Data: Governance Options for Agriculture and Nutrition , 2017 .

[42]  L. Kool,et al.  Human rights in the robot age: challenges arising from the use of robotics, artificial intelligence, and virtual and augmented reality , 2017 .

[43]  M. Carolan.  Publicising Food: Big Data, Precision Agriculture, and Co-Experimental Techniques of Addition , 2017 .

[44]  Mariarosaria Taddeo,et al.  The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate , 2016, Big Data Soc..

[45]  Sander Janssen,et al.  Analysis of Big Data technologies for use in agro-environmental science , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[46]  Michael E. Sykuta,et al.  Big Data in Agriculture: Property Rights, Privacy and Competition in Ag Data Services , 2016 .

[47]  Peter Hehenberger,et al.  Mechatronic Futures: Challenges and Solutions for Mechatronic Systems and their Designers , 2016 .

[48]  Kelly Bronson,et al.  Big Data in food and agriculture , 2016 .

[49]  Isabelle Carbonell,et al.  The Ethics of Big Data in Big Agriculture , 2016 .

[50]  L.F.M. Heutinck,et al.  Cows desiring to be milked? Milking robots and the co-evolution of ethics and technology on Dutch dairy farms , 2015 .

[51]  Frank A. Pasquale.  The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information , 2015 .

[52]  N. Kshetri.  The emerging role of Big Data in key development issues: Opportunities, challenges, and concerns , 2014, Big Data Soc..

[53]  D. Korenstein.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of Less is more: Overdiagnosis and overtreatment: evaluation of what physicians tell their patients about screening harms. , 2014 .

[54]  P. Osseweijer,et al.  The Why and How of Enabling the Integration of Social and Ethical Aspects in Research and Development , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[55]  Brian Reid,et al.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: an opportunity for improvement. , 2013, JAMA.

[56]  R. V. Schomberg.  A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2013 .

[57]  Edward H. Glaessgen,et al.  The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles , 2012 .

[58]  D. Gibbs,et al.  Choosing and rejecting cattle and sheep: changing discourses and practices of (de)selection in pedigree livestock breeding , 2011 .

[59]  S. Michael Spottswood,et al.  Reengineering Aircraft Structural Life Prediction Using a Digital Twin , 2011 .

[60]  Anke van Gorp,et al.  Parallel, Embedded or Just Part of the Team: Ethicists Cooperating Within a European Security Research Project , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[61]  L. Holloway.  Subjecting Cows to Robots: Farming Technologies and the Making of Animal Subjects , 2007 .

[62]  S. Fountas,et al.  A model of decision-making and information flows for information-intensive agriculture , 2006 .

[63]  Lucas D. Introna.  Disclosive Ethics and Information Technology: Disclosing Facial Recognition Systems , 2005, Ethics and Information Technology.

[64]  M. Winter,et al.  Agriculture 4.0: Making it work for people, production, and the planet , 2021, Land Use Policy.

[65]  E. Pekkeriet,et al.  Arbeid in de toekomst : Inzicht in arbeid en goed werkgeverschap in de tuinbouw , 2020 .

[66]  Marie-Agnès Jouanjean,et al.  Issues around data governance in the digital transformation of agriculture , 2020 .

[67]  Sarah Fowler-Dixon,et al.  The Ethics , 2020, A Spinoza Reader.

[68]  L. Wiseman,et al.  Rethinking Ag Data Ownership , 2018 .

[69]  Abdulmotaleb El Saddik,et al.  Digital Twins: The Convergence of Multimedia Technologies , 2018, IEEE MultiMedia.

[70]  Cor Verdouw,et al.  Digital twins in farm management : illustrations from the FIWARE accelerators SmartAgriFood and Fractals , 2017 .

[71]  E. Schoitsch.  „Smart Systems Everywhere – how much Smartness is tolerable?” , 2017 .

[72]  Lan Ge,et al.  Guidelines For Governance Of Data Sharing In Agri-Food Networks , 2017 .

[73]  Michael A. Osborne,et al.  The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? , 2017 .

[74]  R. Darnell,et al.  Accelerating precision agriculture to decision agriculture: Enabling digital agriculture in Australia , 2017 .

[75]  J. M. Bos,et al.  Digitalisering van dieren : Verkenning Precision Livestock Farming , 2016 .

[76]  P. Macnaghten.  The metis of responsible innovation : helping society to get better at the conversation between today and tomorrow , 2016 .

[77]  L. Kool,et al.  Working on the robot society.: Visions and insights from science about the relation technology and employment. , 2015 .

[78]  G. Hahn.  Dynamic responses of cattle to thermal heat loads. , 1999, Journal of animal science.