Breast cancer screening and cost‐effectiveness; Policy alternatives, quality of life considerations and the possible impact of uncertain factors

Mammographic screening for women aged 50‐70 is effective in reducing breast cancer mortality, but the impact on quality of life and the attainable mortality reduction remain t o be discussed. The consequences of expanding screening programmes to include women in other age groups are uncertain. We have predicted the effects and costs for 5 popular screening variants, differing in age group and screening interval, on the basis of our analysis of the Dutch screening trials and of the reported mortality reductions in other trials. We have also investigated the influence of a large number of uncertain factors. Screening for women aged 50 and over with a 2‐ or 3‐year interval is very cost‐effective and will result in reductions of respectively 16% or 10% in breast cancer mortality in a real population. Variation of most variables keeps the cost‐effectiveness (CE) ratio limited to the range of US $3,000 to 5,000 per life‐year gained. A 2‐ to 3‐fold change in CE ratio would only occur if the extreme estimates of mortality reduction in the Swedish screening trials were applied. The impact on quality of life (QoL) is limited: for the 2‐yearly screening policy for women aged 50‐70, the cost per Quality‐Adjusted Life‐Year (QALY) gained is 4,050, whereas the cost per life‐year gained is US $3,825. The CE ratio for 2‐yearly screening of women aged 40‐70 is 5,400, but the additional cost per additional life‐year gained is US $35,000. It would be preferable by far to extend the screening programme to women over the age of 70 or to shorten the screening interval for women aged 50‐70. Screening performances, the demand for mammograms outside screening and the possibility of a survival improvement irrespective of screening have a strong impact on QoL and CE.

[1]  I Andersson,et al.  Chapter IV. Reduced breast‐cancer mortality with mammography screening‐an assessment of currently available data , 1990, International journal of cancer. Supplement = Journal international du cancer. Supplement.

[2]  HJ de Koning,et al.  Breast cancer screening: its impact on clinical medicine , 1990, British Journal of Cancer.

[3]  A. Miller,et al.  Report on a workshop of the UICC project on evaluation of screening for cancer , 1990, International journal of cancer.

[4]  I. Gram,et al.  Quality of life following a false positive mammogram. , 1990, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Time interval since last test in a breast cancer screening programme: a case-control study in Italy. , 1989, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[6]  L. Tabár,et al.  The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit. , 1989, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[7]  J D Habbema,et al.  A model for breast cancer screening , 1990, Cancer.

[8]  S. Moss,et al.  Psychiatric morbidity associated with screening for breast cancer. , 1989, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  L. Tabár,et al.  What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial. , 1987, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  C. Boggis,et al.  Response by women aged 65-79 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study. , 1990, BMJ.

[11]  Harry J. de Koning,et al.  The impact of a breast cancer screening programme on quality‐adjusted life‐years , 1991, International journal of cancer.

[12]  H. Gravelle,et al.  Will a breast screening programme change the workload and referral practice of general practitioners? , 1990, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[13]  J. Habbema,et al.  The cost‐effectiveness of breast cancer screening , 1989, International journal of cancer.

[14]  N. Day,et al.  EVALUATION OF SCREENING FOR BREAST CANCER IN A NON-RANDOMISED STUDY (THE DOM PROJECT) BY MEANS OF A CASE-CONTROL STUDY , 1984, The Lancet.

[15]  I Persson,et al.  The relation between survival and age at diagnosis in breast cancer. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  M. Burke,et al.  Changing patterns in the presentation of breast cancer over 25 years. , 1990, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[17]  J. Hendriks,et al.  REDUCTION OF BREAST CANCER MORTALITY THROUGH MASS SCREENING WITH MODERN MAMMOGRAPHY First Results of the Nijmegen Project, 1975 - 1981 , 1984, The Lancet.

[18]  T. Landberg,et al.  Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial. , 1988, BMJ.

[19]  A. Huggins,et al.  Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years , 1990, The Lancet.