Healthy Aging Delays Scalp EEG Sensitivity to Noise in a Face Discrimination Task

We used a single-trial ERP approach to quantify age-related changes in the time-course of noise sensitivity. A total of 62 healthy adults, aged between 19 and 98, performed a non-speeded discrimination task between two faces. Stimulus information was controlled by parametrically manipulating the phase spectrum of these faces. Behavioral 75% correct thresholds increased with age. This result may be explained by lower signal-to-noise ratios in older brains. ERP from each subject were entered into a single-trial general linear regression model to identify variations in neural activity statistically associated with changes in image structure. The fit of the model, indexed by R2, was computed at multiple post-stimulus time points. The time-course of the R2 function showed significantly delayed noise sensitivity in older observers. This age effect is reliable, as demonstrated by test–retest in 24 subjects, and started about 120 ms after stimulus onset. Our analyses suggest also a qualitative change from a young to an older pattern of brain activity at around 47 ± 4 years old.

[1]  D. Perrett,et al.  Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: an account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations , 1998, Cognition.

[2]  G. Rousselet,et al.  Parametric study of EEG sensitivity to phase noise during face processing , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[3]  Alan Peters,et al.  The Effects of Normal Aging on Myelinated Nerve Fibers in Monkey Central Nervous System , 2009, Front. Neuroanat..

[4]  Anne Moskowitz,et al.  Effect of retinal blur on the peak latency of the pattern evoked potential , 1981, Vision Research.

[5]  R. Wilcox Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing , 1997 .

[6]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  E. Vogel,et al.  The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[8]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Dedifferentiation in the visual cortex: An fMRI investigation of individual differences in older adults , 2008, Brain Research.

[9]  G. Harding,et al.  Visual evoked magnetic fields to flash and pattern in 100 normal subjects , 1991, Vision Research.

[10]  N. A. Shaw,et al.  Age-dependent changes in the latency of the pattern visual evoked potential. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Aging reduces neural specialization in ventral visual cortex. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  C. Owsley,et al.  Aging, senile miosis and spatial contrast sensitivity at low luminance , 1988, Vision Research.

[13]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Single-trial EEG dynamics of object and face visual processing , 2007, NeuroImage.

[14]  Mary A. Peterson,et al.  Reduction in White Matter Connectivity, Revealed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging, May Account for Age-related Changes in Face Perception , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  M J R Healy,et al.  Matrices for Statistics , 1986 .

[16]  Felix Wichmann,et al.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Yuanye Ma,et al.  Degradation of signal timing in cortical areas V1 and V2 of senescent monkeys. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  K. Haywood,et al.  Altered pattern evoked retinal and cortical potentials associated with human senescence. , 1986, Current eye research.

[19]  C C Wood,et al.  Developmental and aging changes in somatosensory, auditory and visual evoked potentials. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Neural Representation of Task Difficulty and Decision Making during Perceptual Categorization: A Timing Diagram , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  C. Hawkes,et al.  Pupil size and the pattern evoked visual response. , 1981, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  S Tobimatsu,et al.  Age-related changes in pattern visual evoked potentials: differential effects of luminance, contrast and check size. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  L. Penrose Evidence of heterosis in man , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[24]  J. W. Howe,et al.  Visual evoked potentials in the older population: age and gender effects. , 1987, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[25]  S. Tobimatsu,et al.  The neurophysiologic significance of frontal negativity in pattern-reversal visual-evoked potentials. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  N. A. Shaw,et al.  Effects of luminance on the pattern visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  A. Moskowitz,et al.  Age-related changes in the latency of the visual evoked potential: Influences of check size ☆ , 1981 .

[28]  David D. Cox,et al.  Untangling invariant object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  B. Jeune,et al.  [With the age....]. , 1999, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[30]  Mark Von Tress,et al.  Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models , 2003, Technometrics.

[31]  Jesse S. Husk,et al.  Time course and robustness of ERP object and face differences. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[32]  D. Kaufman,et al.  Effect of decreased retinal illumination on simultaneously recorded pattern electroretinograms and visual-evoked potentials. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[33]  R. Knight,et al.  Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Limits of ERP differences in tracking object processing speed. , 2007 .

[35]  M. Pitt,et al.  The use of weighted quadratic regression for the study of latencies of the P100 component of the visual evoked potential. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[36]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[37]  P. Bennett,et al.  Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers , 1999, Vision Research.

[38]  Jesse S. Husk,et al.  Age-related delay in information accrual for faces: Evidence from a parametric, single-trial EEG approach , 2010 .

[39]  W. Singer,et al.  Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience Integrative Neuroscience Neural Synchrony in Cortical Networks: History, Concept and Current Status , 2022 .

[40]  G. Rousselet,et al.  How do amplitude spectra influence rapid animal detection? , 2009, Vision Research.

[41]  B. Renault,et al.  An ERP Study of Famous Face Incongruity Detection in Middle Age , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[42]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[43]  B. Renault,et al.  Age-related changes in brain responses to personally known faces: an event-related potential (ERP) study in humans , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[44]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Assessing the effects of age on long white matter tracts using diffusion tensor tractography , 2009, NeuroImage.

[45]  S. Tobimatsu Aging and pattern visual evoked potentials. , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[46]  C. Grady Cognitive Neuroscience of Aging , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[47]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Electroencephalographic Brain Dynamics Following Manually Responded Visual Targets , 2004, PLoS biology.

[48]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Functional degradation of extrastriate visual cortex in senescent rhesus monkeys , 2006, Neuroscience.

[49]  S. Thorpe,et al.  How parallel is visual processing in the ventral pathway? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  Jesse S. Husk,et al.  Inverting houses and textures: Investigating the characteristics of learned inversion effects , 2007, Vision Research.

[51]  P. Sajda,et al.  Temporal characterization of the neural correlates of perceptual decision making in the human brain. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[53]  Age-related changes in brain neuromagnetic responses to face perception in humans , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[54]  G. M. Halliday,et al.  White matter loss in healthy ageing: A postmortem analysis , 2009, Neurobiology of Aging.

[55]  A. Moskowitz,et al.  Age-related changes in the latency of the visual evoked potential: influence of check size. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[56]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Aging disrupts the neural transformations that link facial identity across views , 2008, Vision Research.

[57]  Matthias Dümpelmann,et al.  The effect of face inversion on intracranial and scalp recordings of event-related potentials. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[58]  Lucy S. Petro,et al.  Dynamics of Visual Information Integration in the Brain for Categorizing Facial Expressions , 2007, Current Biology.

[59]  D. Whitaker,et al.  Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[60]  Shozo Tobimatsu,et al.  Effects of pupil diameter and luminance changes on pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials , 1988 .

[61]  Jing Xu,et al.  Aging effects on early-stage face perception: an ERP study. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[62]  J. D. Morrison,et al.  The pattern visual evoked cortical response in human ageing. , 1989, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology.

[63]  E. Ziegel Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing (2nd ed.) , 2005 .

[64]  J. Bullier Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[65]  D. Kaufman,et al.  Effects of age and sex on pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[66]  Peter Kovesi,et al.  Phase Congruency Detects Corners and Edges , 2003, DICTA.

[67]  A. Leventhal,et al.  GABA and Its Agonists Improved Visual Cortical Function in Senescent Monkeys , 2003, Science.

[68]  Peter Kovesi,et al.  Image Features from Phase Congruency , 1995 .

[69]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Information processing algorithms in the brain , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[70]  Pejman Sehatpour,et al.  A human intracranial study of long-range oscillatory coherence across a frontal–occipital–hippocampal brain network during visual object processing , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[71]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  Age-related slowing in face and name recognition: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[72]  Zara M. Bergström,et al.  Behavioral and ERP evidence of greater distractor processing in old age , 2009, Brain Research.

[73]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Inversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG , 2006, Brain Research.

[74]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Spatio temporal dynamics of face recognition. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.