Hierarchical structures of the actin/polycation complexes, investigated by ultra-small-angle neutron scattering and fluorescence microscopy

By employing a combined method of ultra-small-angle & small-angle neutron scattering (USANS&SANS) and fluorescence microscopy (FM), we investigated the solution mixtures of filamentous actin (F-actin) and the synthesized cationic polymer poly-N-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]acrylamide methylchloride quaternary (PDMAPAA-Q). The combined USANS&SANS method, covering a wide range of length scales from 10 micrometres to nanometres, plays a crucial role in elucidating the hierarchical structure of the complex structure, as it is in an aqueous solution. FM determined that the complex of F-actin and PDMAPAA-Q appears with a finite size (>10μm), referred to as a superbundle, and its morphology changes from a globular one to a stretched one by increasing the salt (KCl) concentration Cs from 0.01 to 0.3 M. USANS&SANS revealed that the superbundle is composed of a structural unit of a protobundle, in which PDMAPAA-Q binds F-actins in order to form a hexagonal lattice. The diameter of the protobundle (DII), determined by USANS&SANS, increases from 40 to 290 nm as Cs increases from 0.01 to 0.3 M. In order to explain the finite-size & hierarchical condensation observed in the actin/PDMAPAA-Q solution, we employ a scenario of imperfect charge neutralization between F-actins and PDMAPAA-Q. Due to the chain connectivity of PDMAPAA-Q, a spatial distribution of positive charges around the F-actins becomes inhomogeneous, so that the repulsive electrostatic interaction appearing in the protobundle limits bundle formation with an infinite-size. The morphology of the superbundles is controlled by the bending rigidity due to individual protobundles, which significantly increases as DII increases.

[1]  S. Hell,et al.  Diffraction-unlimited three-dimensional optical nanoscopy with opposing lenses , 2009 .

[2]  A. Bausch,et al.  Helical twist controls the thickness of F-actin bundles , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  N. Gov,et al.  Thickness distribution of actin bundles in vitro , 2008, European Biophysics Journal.

[4]  T. Oku,et al.  Focusing and polarized neutron small-angle scattering spectrometer (SANS-J-II). The challenge of observation over length scales from an angstrom to a micrometre , 2007 .

[5]  T. Hashimoto,et al.  Tandem analyzer crystals system doubles counting rate for Bonse–Hart ultra-small-angle neutron-scattering spectrometer , 2006 .

[6]  J. Gong,et al.  Anisotropic nucleation growth of actin bundle: a model for determining the well-defined thickness of bundles. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[7]  G. Wong,et al.  The effect of salt on self-assembled actin-lysozyme complexes. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[8]  R. Golestanian,et al.  Evolution of growth modes for polyelectrolyte bundles. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[9]  J. Gong,et al.  Morphology of actin assemblies in response to polycation and salts. , 2005, Biomacromolecules.

[10]  T. Angelini,et al.  Structure and stability of self-assembled actin-lysozyme complexes in salty water. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[11]  P. Pincus,et al.  Equilibrium bundle size of rodlike polyelectrolytes with counterion-induced attractive interactions. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  K. Yoshikawa,et al.  Competition between compaction of single chains and bundling of multiple chains in giant DNA molecules. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[13]  Yoshihito Osada,et al.  Growth of large polymer-actin complexes. , 2003, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[14]  Youli Li,et al.  Structure of actin cross-linked with alpha-actinin: a network of bundles. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[15]  Willy Wriggers,et al.  Like-charge attraction between polyelectrolytes induced by counterion charge density waves , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Jay X. Tang,et al.  Lamellar phase of stacked two-dimensional rafts of actin filaments. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[17]  M. Kikumoto,et al.  Partial specific volume and adiabatic compressibility of G-actin depend on the bound nucleotide. , 2003, Journal of biochemistry.

[18]  Nils Ole Steffens,et al.  Characterization of the actin binding properties of the vasodilator‐stimulated phosphoprotein VASP , 1999, FEBS letters.

[19]  J. Ervasti,et al.  A Cluster of Basic Repeats in the Dystrophin Rod Domain Binds F-actin through an Electrostatic Interaction* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  Andrea J. Liu,et al.  EFFECT OF NON-PAIRWISE-ADDITIVE INTERACTIONS ON BUNDLES OF RODLIKE POLYELECTROLYTES , 1998 .

[21]  P. Janmey,et al.  Electrostatic effects of smooth muscle calponin on actin assembly. , 1997, European journal of biochemistry.

[22]  E Grazi,et al.  What is the diameter of the actin filament? , 1997, FEBS letters.

[23]  Jay X. Tang,et al.  The Polyelectrolyte Nature of F-actin and the Mechanism of Actin Bundle Formation (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  H. Tomimitsu,et al.  Design and use of a double crystal diffractometer for very small angle neutron scattering at JRR-3M , 1995 .

[25]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Atomic model of the actin filament , 1990, Nature.

[26]  G. Porod,et al.  Die Röntgenkleinwinkelstreuung von dichtgepackten kolloiden Systemen , 1952 .