Evaluation of Photogrammetry and Inclusion of Control Points: Significance for Infrastructure Monitoring

Structure from Motion (SfM)/Photogrammetry is a powerful mapping tool in extracting three-dimensional (3D) models from photographs. This method has been applied to a range of applications, including monitoring of infrastructure systems. This technique could potentially become a substitute, or at least a complement, for costlier approaches such as laser scanning for infrastructure monitoring. This study expands on previous investigations, which utilize photogrammetry point cloud data to measure failure mode behavior of a retaining wall model, emphasizing further robust spatial testing. In this study, a comparison of two commonly used photogrammetry software packages was implemented to assess the computing performance of the method and the significance of control points in this approach. The impact of control point selection, as part of the photogrammetric modeling processes, was also evaluated. Comparisons between the two software tools reveal similar performances in capturing quantitative changes of a retaining wall structure. Results also demonstrate that increasing the number of control points above a certain number does not, necessarily, increase 3D modeling accuracies, but, in some cases, their spatial distribution can be more critical. Furthermore, errors in model reproducibility, when compared with total station measurements, were found to be spatially correlated with the arrangement of control points.

[1]  Jung-Geun Han,et al.  Application of a Photogrammetric System for Monitoring Civil Engineering Structures , 2012 .

[2]  Gianfranco Forlani,et al.  Terrestrial photogrammetry without ground control points , 2014, Earth Science Informatics.

[3]  Ashley Buss,et al.  Highway Infrastructure Health Monitoring Using Micro-Electromechanical Sensors and Systems (MEMS) , 2014 .

[4]  Kenneth R. White,et al.  Close-range photogrammetry applications in bridge measurement: Literature review , 2008 .

[5]  Amit Armstrong,et al.  Retaining Walls Are Assets Too , 2009 .

[6]  T. Udelhoven,et al.  SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF UAV-PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR CREATING DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS (DEM) , 2012 .

[7]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Integration of Construction As-Built Data Via Laser Scanning with Geotechnical Monitoring of Urban Excavation , 2006 .

[8]  Yi-Hsing Tseng,et al.  Advancement of close range photogrammetry with a portable panoramic image mapping system (PPIMS) , 2018 .

[9]  Wai Shiang Cheah,et al.  Evaluation of Control Points’ Distribution on Distortions and Geometric Transformations for Aerial Images Rectification , 2012 .

[10]  Mohammed A. Gabr,et al.  Retaining Wall Field Condition Inspection, Rating Analysis, and Condition Assessment , 2016 .

[11]  Thomas Oommen,et al.  A Novel Application of Photogrammetry for Retaining Wall Assessment , 2017 .

[12]  Ruedi Boesch,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of Digital Surface Models from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles' Imagery on Glaciers , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Mozhdeh Shahbazi,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a UAV-Photogrammetry System for Precise 3D Environmental Modeling , 2015, Sensors.

[14]  Dong-Hyun Kim,et al.  A photogrammetric approach for stability analysis of weathered rock slopes , 2015 .

[15]  Stefan Winter,et al.  Use of digital image processing in the monitoring of deformations in building structures , 2015 .

[16]  Ioannis Brilakis,et al.  Comparison of Optical Sensor-Based Spatial Data Collection Techniques for Civil Infrastructure Modeling , 2009 .

[17]  Daniel Alzamora,et al.  Asset Management Systems for Retaining Walls , 2008 .

[18]  Anuar Ahmad,et al.  Assessment of Photogrammetric Mapping Accuracy Based on Variation Flying Altitude Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2014 .

[19]  Mani Golparvar-Fard,et al.  Evaluation of image-based modeling and laser scanning accuracy for emerging automated performance monitoring techniques , 2011 .

[20]  Virginia P. Sisiopiku,et al.  Congestion Quantification Using the National Performance Management Research Data Set , 2017, Data.

[21]  R. B. Zeidler,et al.  Soil mechanics, foundations and footings , 1991 .

[22]  Pedro Arias,et al.  An innovative method for remote measurement of minimum vertical underclearance in routine bridge inspection , 2012 .

[23]  Hiroshi Hattori,et al.  Image-Based Monitoring of Open Gears of Movable Bridges for Condition Assessment and Maintenance Decision Making , 2015 .

[24]  Thomas Oommen,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-Based Assessment of Concrete Bridge Deck Delamination Using Thermal and Visible Camera Sensors: A Preliminary Analysis , 2018 .

[25]  K. Bakuła,et al.  POSSIBILITIES FOR USING LIDAR AND PHOTOGRAMMETRIC DATA OBTAINED WITH AN UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE FOR LEVEE MONITORING , 2016 .

[26]  Matthew W. Frost,et al.  Measuring deformation performance of geogrid reinforced structures using a terrestrial laser scanner , 2014 .

[27]  Glenn A. Romig.  Earth Pressure and Earth-Retaining Structures , 1995 .

[28]  Jianwei Gong,et al.  Mobile Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Highway Inventory Data Collection , 2012 .

[29]  P. Wolf,et al.  Elements of Photogrammetry(with Applications in GIS) , 2000 .

[30]  Rita Ambu,et al.  Advanced 3D Photogrammetric Surface Reconstruction of Extensive Objects by UAV Camera Image Acquisition , 2018, Sensors.

[31]  Gianfranco Forlani,et al.  Testing Accuracy and Repeatability of UAV Blocks Oriented with GNSS-Supported Aerial Triangulation , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[32]  Aivars Alt,et al.  Combined 3D building surveying techniques – terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and total station surveying for BIM data management purposes , 2013 .

[33]  Ming Lu,et al.  Analytical Approach to Augmenting Site Photos with 3D Graphics of Underground Infrastructure in Construction Engineering Applications , 2011, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[34]  Eija Honkavaara,et al.  Point Cloud Generation from Aerial Image Data Acquired by a Quadrocopter Type Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and a Digital Still Camera , 2012, Sensors.

[35]  Fernando A. Branco,et al.  Engineering risk management in performance-based building environments , 2015 .

[36]  Fernanda Leite,et al.  Evaluation of accuracy of as-built 3D modeling from photos taken by handheld digital cameras , 2012 .

[37]  Fei Dai,et al.  Comparison of Image-Based and Time-of-Flight-Based Technologies for Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Infrastructure , 2013 .

[38]  Toby N. Tonkin,et al.  Ground-Control Networks for Image Based Surface Reconstruction: An Investigation of Optimum Survey Designs Using UAV Derived Imagery and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[39]  Ali Khaloo,et al.  Hierarchical Dense Structure-from-Motion Reconstructions for Infrastructure Condition Assessment , 2017, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[40]  Shih-Heng Tung,et al.  Measuring the in situ deformation of retaining walls by the digital image correlation method , 2013 .

[41]  Margaret Kalacska,et al.  UAV-Based 3D Point Clouds of Freshwater Fish Habitats, Xingu River Basin, Brazil , 2019, Data.

[42]  Kyriacos Themistocleous,et al.  Critical infrastructure monitoring using UAV imagery , 2016, International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of Environment.

[43]  Brent Allan Slaker,et al.  Monitoring Underground Mine Displacement Using Photogrammetry and Laser Scanning , 2015 .

[44]  Youyi Feng,et al.  Photogrammetric error sources and impacts on modeling and surveying in construction engineering applications , 2014 .

[45]  Jie Gong,et al.  Image-Based 3D Reconstruction for Posthurricane Residential Building Damage Assessment , 2016, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[46]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[47]  K. N. Tahar.  AN EVALUATION ON DIFFERENT NUMBER OF GROUND CONTROL POINTS IN UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE PHOTOGRAMMETRIC BLOCK , 2013 .

[48]  T. Leslie Youd,et al.  Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 2 - Retaining Structures, Slopes, Tunnels, Culverts and Roadways , 2004 .