Sympatric speciation by sexual selection

There is increasing evidence for the process of sympatric speciation, in which reproductive isolation of species occurs without physical isolation. Theoretical models have focused on disruptive natural selection as the crucial pressure for splitting a species. Here we report the theoretical finding that sympatric speciation may be caused by sexual selection even without disruptive natural selection. Specifically, we show that variation in a male secondary sexual character with two conspicuous extremes and the corresponding variance in female mating preference around no preference may jointly evolve into bimodal distributions with increasing modal divergence of the male and female traits, pulling a population apart into two prezygotically isolated populations. This mode of speciation, driven by two runaway processes in different directions, is promoted by an increase in the efficiency of females in discriminating among males or a decrease in the cost of male conspicuousness, indicating that sympatric speciation may occur more readily if barrier-free or predator-free conditions arise. Although even a slight cost of female preference would cancel the runaway process of sexual selection, it would not cancel the divergent runaway processes of sympatric speciation.

[1]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES II. THE “HANDICAP” PRINCIPLE , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Cichlid Fish Diversity Threatened by Eutrophication That Curbs Sexual Selection , 1997 .

[3]  Daniel J. Howard,et al.  Endless Forms: Species and Speciation , 1998 .

[4]  J. Seger UNIFYING GENETIC MODELS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  A. Pomiankowski The costs of choice in sexual selection. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  Fyodor A. Kondrashov,et al.  Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation , 1999, Nature.

[7]  G. Roderick,et al.  Endless Forms – Species and Speciation , 2000, Heredity.

[8]  T. Price,et al.  SPECIATION BY REINFORCEMENT OF PREMATING ISOLATION , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  T. Kocher,et al.  Phylogeny of a rapidly evolving clade: the cichlid fishes of Lake Malawi, East Africa. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Chung-I Wu A STOCHASTIC SIMULATION STUDY ON SPECIATION BY SEXUAL SELECTION , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  T. Kawecki SYMPATRIC SPECIATION VIA HABITAT SPECIALIZATION DRIVEN BY DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES I. FISHER AND BIASED MUTATION , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  On the origin of species by sympatric speciation , 1999, Nature.

[14]  G. Turner,et al.  A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  M. Doebeli A quantitative genetic competition model for sympatric speciation , 1996 .

[16]  G. Bush,et al.  Sympatric speciation in animals: new wine in old bottles. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .

[18]  UDO M. SAVALLI,et al.  Female choice , 1989, Nature.

[19]  O. Seehausen,et al.  The effect of male coloration on female mate choice in closely related Lake Victoria cichlids (Haplochromis nyererei complex) , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[20]  John A. Endler,et al.  Speciation and Its Consequences , 1989 .

[21]  J. Deutsch Colour diversification in Malawi cichlids: evidence for adaptation, reinforcement or sexual selection? , 1997 .

[22]  M. Tauber,et al.  A genetic model for sympatric speciation through habitat diversification and seasonal isolation , 1977, Nature.

[23]  R. Lande Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.