Automatic detection of diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration in digital fundus images.

PURPOSE To describe and evaluate the performance of an algorithm that automatically classifies images with pathologic features commonly found in diabetic retinopathy (DR) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS Retinal digital photographs (N = 2247) of three fields of view (FOV) were obtained of the eyes of 822 patients at two centers: The Retina Institute of South Texas (RIST, San Antonio, TX) and The University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio (UTHSCSA). Ground truth was provided for the presence of pathologic conditions, including microaneurysms, hemorrhages, exudates, neovascularization in the optic disc and elsewhere, drusen, abnormal pigmentation, and geographic atrophy. The algorithm was used to report on the presence or absence of disease. A detection threshold was applied to obtain different values of sensitivity and specificity with respect to ground truth and to construct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS The system achieved an average area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.89 for detection of DR and of 0.92 for detection of sight-threatening DR (STDR). With a fixed specificity of 0.50, the system's sensitivity ranged from 0.92 for all DR cases to 1.00 for clinically significant macular edema (CSME). CONCLUSIONS A computer-aided algorithm was trained to detect different types of pathologic retinal conditions. The cases of hard exudates within 1 disc diameter (DD) of the fovea (surrogate for CSME) were detected with very high accuracy (sensitivity = 1, specificity = 0.50), whereas mild nonproliferative DR was the most challenging condition (sensitivity = 0.92, specificity = 0.50). The algorithm was also tested on images with signs of AMD, achieving a performance of AUC of 0.84 (sensitivity = 0.94, specificity = 0.50).

[1]  J. Olson,et al.  Automated assessment of diabetic retinal image quality based on clarity and field definition. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  J. Olson,et al.  Automated grading for diabetic retinopathy: a large-scale audit using arbitration by clinical experts , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[3]  P. Scanlon,et al.  The effectiveness of screening for diabetic retinopathy by digital imaging photography and technician ophthalmoscopy , 2003, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[4]  RETINA , 1965 .

[5]  Marios S. Pattichis,et al.  Effects of image compression and degradation on an automatic diabetic retinopathy screening algorithm , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Marios S. Pattichis,et al.  Multi-scale AM-FM for lesion phenotyping on age-related macular degeneration , 2009, 2009 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems.

[7]  L. Aiello,et al.  Detection of diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmoscopy versus photography--Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report Number 5. The ETDRS Research Group. , 1989, Ophthalmology.

[8]  Benita J. O’Colmain,et al.  Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  Nathan Congdon,et al.  The Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in the United States , 2002 .

[10]  Marios S. Pattichis,et al.  Automatic system for diabetic retinopathy screening based on AM-FM, partial least squares, and support vector machines , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[11]  E. Chaum,et al.  AUTOMATED DIAGNOSIS OF RETINOPATHY BY CONTENT-BASED IMAGE RETRIEVAL , 2008, Retina.

[12]  Marios S. Pattichis,et al.  Multiscale AM-FM Methods for Diabetic Retinopathy Lesion Detection , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Weijie Chen,et al.  Training variability in the evaluation of automated classifiers , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[14]  P. Soliz,et al.  Detection and phenotyping of retinal disease using AM-FM processing for feature extraction , 2008, 2008 42nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[15]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  Information Fusion for Diabetic Retinopathy CAD in Digital Color Fundus Photographs , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  M. Larsen,et al.  Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy in a fundus photographic screening population. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  Ann L. Albright,et al.  Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the United States, 2005-2008. , 2010, JAMA.

[18]  Victor Manuel,et al.  AM-FM methods for image and video processing , 2009 .

[19]  Helen K. Li,et al.  Digital versus film Fundus photography for research grading of diabetic retinopathy severity. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  Marios S. Pattichis,et al.  Multiscale AM-FM Demodulation and Image Reconstruction Methods With Improved Accuracy , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[21]  Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs--an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[22]  Meindert Niemeijer,et al.  Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy: barriers to translation into clinical practice , 2010, Expert review of medical devices.

[23]  Alexander R de Leon,et al.  Benefits of stereopsis when identifying clinically significant macular edema via teleophthalmology. , 2006, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[24]  M. Cree,et al.  Automated Image Detection of Retinal Pathology , 2009 .

[25]  P F Sharp,et al.  Costs and consequences of automated algorithms versus manual grading for the detection of referable diabetic retinopathy , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.