LFG and Dynamic Syntax: Two non-derivational theories

[1]  W. Bruce Croft.  Beyond Aristotle and gradience: A reply to Aarts , 2007 .

[2]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  A Theory of Syntax: Minimal Operations and Universal Grammar , 2008 .

[3]  Lutz Marten,et al.  The Dynamics of Language , 2005 .

[4]  C. Hagège.  Towards a typology of interrogative verbs , 2008 .

[5]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Dynamic syntax - the flow of language understanding , 2000 .

[6]  Robert N. McCauley,et al.  The Churchlands and their critics , 1996 .

[7]  S. Levinson,et al.  The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[8]  J. Bresnan.  Lexical-Functional Syntax , 2000 .

[9]  J. Fodor.  Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis) , 1974, Synthese.

[10]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[11]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[12]  R. Nordlinger.  Constructive Case: Evidence from Australian Languages , 1998 .

[13]  Ruth Kempson,et al.  Multiple long-distance scrambling: Syntax as reflections of processing , 2010 .

[14]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Language in flux : dialogue coordination, language variation, change and evolution , 2008 .

[15]  J. Hawkins.  Efficiency and complexity in grammars , 2004 .

[16]  Cedric Boeckx.  Understanding Minimalist Syntax: Lessons from Locality in Long-Distance Dependencies , 2006 .

[17]  Jerry A. Fodor,et al.  In critical condition : polemical essays on cognitive science and the philosophy of mind , 2000 .

[18]  Shalom Lappin,et al.  A Critique of the Minimalist Program , 1997 .

[19]  Rens Bod,et al.  From Exemplar to Grammar: A Probabilistic Analogy-Based Model of Language Learning , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  Ronnie Cann,et al.  Production pressures, syntactic change and the emergence of clitic pronouns , 2008 .