Conductivity and performance of hydraulic fractures partially filled with compressible proppant packs

Abstract Hydraulic or fluid-driven fracturing techniques are often utilised to enhance the production of oil or gas from hydrocarbon reservoirs. There are a number of engineering guidelines to identify the optimum fracture dimensions (i.e. length and average opening) and optimum fracture conductivity, which maximize the efficiency of a given hydraulic fracturing procedure. However, the fracture dimensions as well as conductivity during the production stage may be below the expected design values due to the compressive in-situ stresses, the non-uniform distribution of the proppant within the fracture, as well as the compressibility of the fractured rock and proppant pack. In this paper, the performance of the hydraulic fracture, which is partially filled with a compressible proppant pack, is evaluated using a simple mathematical model. The mathematical model incorporates the aforementioned effects of proppant compressibility and in-situ stresses. A case study is conducted to investigate phenomena such as: the residual opening of fracture faces not supported by the proppant pack, the compaction of the proppant pack under the action of the confining stresses and the subsequent reduction in the permeability of the proppant pack.

[1]  Andrei Kotousov,et al.  On the residual opening of hydraulic fractures , 2013, International Journal of Fracture.

[2]  Ching H. Yew,et al.  Mechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing , 1997 .

[3]  Donald P. Coduto,et al.  Foundation Design: Principles and Practices , 2000 .

[4]  G. S. Penny,et al.  An Evaluation of the Effects of Environmental Conditions and Fracturing Fluids Upon the Long-Term Conductivity of Proppants , 1987 .

[5]  N. J. A. Sloane,et al.  Sphere Packings, Lattices and Groups , 1987, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften.

[6]  Andrei Kotousov,et al.  Residual opening of hydraulic fractures filled with compressible proppant , 2013 .

[7]  Raymond A. Cutler,et al.  Fracture Conductivity Comparison of Ceramic Proppants , 1985 .

[8]  Andrei Kotousov,et al.  Effect of residual opening on the inflow performance of a hydraulic fracture , 2014 .

[9]  J. Geertsma,et al.  A Rapid Method of Predicting Width and Extent of Hydraulically Induced Fractures , 1969 .

[10]  Djebbar Tiab,et al.  Petrophysics: Theory and Practice of Measuring Reservoir Rock and Fluid Transport Properties , 1996 .

[11]  Leon M Keer,et al.  Solution of Crack Problems: The Distributed Dislocation Technique, by D.A. Hills, P.A. Kelly, D.N. Dai and A.M. Korsunsky: Journal of Applied Mechanics , 1996 .

[12]  Gary Mavko,et al.  The effect of a percolation threshold in the Kozeny‐Carman relation , 1997 .

[13]  Dmitry I. Garagash,et al.  Plane-strain propagation of a fluid-driven fracture during injection and shut-in: Asymptotics of large toughness , 2006 .

[14]  Martin Dobson,et al.  Closing the Gap: Fracture Half Length from Design, Buildup, and Production Analysis , 2005 .

[15]  G. I. Barenblatt,et al.  Theory of Fluid Flows Through Natural Rocks , 1990 .

[16]  Jose Adachi,et al.  Computer simulation of hydraulic fractures , 2007 .

[17]  C. T. Montgomery,et al.  Proppant Selection: The Key to Successful Fracture Stimulation , 1984 .

[18]  Andrei Kotousov,et al.  Fracture in plates of finite thickness , 2007 .

[19]  Peter E. Clark,et al.  Prop Transport In Hydraulic Fractures: A Critical Review Of Particle Settling Velocity Equations , 1981 .

[20]  Panos Papanastasiou,et al.  The Effective Fracture Toughness in Hydraulic Fracturing , 1999 .

[21]  K. Terzaghi,et al.  Soil mechanics in engineering practice , 1948 .

[22]  Norman R. Warpinski,et al.  Comparison study of hydraulic fracturing models -- Test case: GRI Staged Field Experiment No. 3 , 1994 .

[23]  Andrei Kotousov,et al.  Residual opening of hydraulically stimulated fractures filled with granular particles , 2012 .

[24]  M. K. Rahman,et al.  A Review of Hydraulic Fracture Models and Development of an Improved Pseudo-3D Model for Stimulating Tight Oil/Gas Sand , 2010 .

[25]  Kenneth D. Mahrer,et al.  A review and perspective on far-field hydraulic fracture geometry studies , 1999 .

[26]  Andrew J. Whittle,et al.  Compression model for cohesionless soils , 1995 .

[27]  I. F. Macdonald,et al.  Flow through Porous Media-the Ergun Equation Revisited , 1979 .

[28]  D. Elsworth,et al.  Experiment and modeling to evaluate the effects of proppant-pack diagenesis on fracture treatments , 2010 .

[29]  P. E. Clark,et al.  Prop Transport in Vertical Fractures: Settling Velocity Correlations , 1983 .

[30]  A. Khanna,et al.  The Performance of Hydraulic Fractures Partially Filled with Compressible Proppant , 2013 .

[31]  V. Mokryakov.  Analytical solution for propagation of hydraulic fracture with Barenblatt’s cohesive tip zone , 2011 .

[32]  Andrei Kotousov,et al.  On a rigid inclusion pressed between two elastic half spaces , 2014 .

[33]  M. W. Conway,et al.  Realistic Assessment of Proppant Pack Conductivity for Material Selection , 2003 .