Cohousing For Whom? Survey Evidence to Support the Diffusion of Socially and Spatially Integrated Housing in the United States

Abstract Cohousing is a resident-led neighborhood development model that clusters private dwelling units around collectively owned and managed spaces, with potential to address long-term social and environmental challenges in American metropolitan regions. To date, however, the cohousing model has been slow to diffuse beyond a demographically narrow following. This limited following may signal to policymakers that cohousing is an unappealing housing model, and therefore an impractical policy objective. Drawing from a survey of 1,000 American residents, the results of a multivariate regression model suggest that (a) many of the characteristics of the current resident population of cohousing in the United States have no statistical association with the individuals who indicate interest in cohousing nationwide; (b) other characteristics serve as better predictors of interest in cohousing; and therefore (c) the slow diffusion of cohousing is likely the consequence of inaccessibility rather than low appeal. Overcoming these challenges demands shifts in policy.

[1]  Robert H. W. Boyer,et al.  Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward , 2016 .

[2]  Sabrina Bresson,et al.  Diversity of self-managed co-housing initiatives in France , 2015 .

[3]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[4]  Hannah Wittman,et al.  Post-occupancy assessment: building design, governance and household consumption , 2010 .

[5]  Rayman Mohamed.  Who Would Pay for Rural Open Space Preservation and Inner-city Redevelopment? Identifying Support for Policies that Can Contribute to Regional Land Use Governance , 2008 .

[7]  Social support in the cohousing model of community: a mixed-methods analysis , 2015 .

[8]  Rachel Botsman,et al.  What's Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption , 2010 .

[9]  C. Bezold,et al.  Evaluating a Long-Term Livable Communities Strategy in the U.S. , 2011 .

[10]  T. Tangeland,et al.  Cultural resources and public trust shape attitudes toward climate change and preferred futures—A case study among the Norwegian public , 2017 .

[11]  D. Myers,et al.  Current preferences and future demand for denser residential environments , 2001 .

[12]  F. Chiodelli.  What is really different between cohousing and gated communities? , 2015 .

[13]  Stephen M. Wheeler,et al.  The Evolution of Built Landscapes in Metropolitan Regions , 2008 .

[14]  P. Burstein.  The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda , 2003 .

[15]  L. Sargisson.  Second-Wave Cohousing: A Modern Utopia? , 2012 .

[16]  Jo Williams,et al.  Predicting an American future for cohousing , 2008 .

[17]  Robert H. W. Boyer.  Intermediacy and the diffusion of grassroots innovations: The case of cohousing in the United States. , 2017 .

[18]  U. S. Census.  2010 Tracts joined to ACS 2013-2017 table: Total Population , 2019 .

[19]  Maria Laura Ruiu.  Differences between Cohousing and Gated Communities. A Literature Review , 2014 .

[20]  L. Horelli,et al.  Design for gender equality - the history of cohousing ideas and realities , 2012 .

[21]  J. Andrey,et al.  Does Design Matter? The Ecological Footprint as a Planning Tool at the Local Level , 2006 .

[22]  Heidi M. Berggren.  Cohousing as Civic Society: Cohousing Involvement and Political Participation in the United States† , 2017 .

[23]  D. Hayden.  Redesigning the American Dream: The Future of Housing, Work and Family Life , 1984 .

[24]  Steven Farber,et al.  Compact development and preference heterogeneity in residential location choice behaviour: A latent class analysis , 2015 .

[25]  R. Harris.  The birth of the housing consumer in the United States, 1918–1960 , 2009 .

[26]  Benjamin I. Page.  Democratic Responsiveness? Untangling the Links Between Public Opinion and Policy , 1994, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[27]  R. Ewing,et al.  Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change , 2008 .

[28]  H. Jarvis.  Saving Space, Sharing Time: Integrated Infrastructures of Daily Life in Cohousing , 2011 .

[29]  Paul Chatterton,et al.  Towards an Agenda for Post‐carbon Cities: Lessons from Lilac, the UK's First Ecological, Affordable Cohousing Community , 2013 .

[30]  K. Baar.  The National Movement to Halt the Spread of Multifamily Housing, 1890-1926 , 1992 .

[31]  M. Baldassare.  PREDICTING LOCAL CONCERN ABOUT GROWTH: THE ROOTS OF CITIZEN DISCONTENT , 1984 .

[32]  Charles L. Koelsche,et al.  The University of Georgia , 2018, State Governments and Research Universities.

[33]  James F. Sallis,et al.  Is Support for Traditionally Designed Communities Growing? Evidence From Two National Surveys , 2008 .

[34]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  The Extent and Determinants of Dissonance between Actual and Preferred Residential Neighborhood Type , 2004 .

[35]  Deliana Kostova.  Can the Built Environment Reduce Obesity? The Impact of Residential Sprawl and Neighborhood Parks on Obesity and Physical Activity , 2011 .

[36]  Robert H. W. Boyer.  Sociotechnical Transitions and Urban Planning , 2014 .

[37]  M. Baldassare.  The Suburban Movement To Limit Growth: Reasons For Support In Orange County , 1985 .

[38]  Robert H. W. Boyer.  Grassroots Innovation for Urban Sustainability: Comparing the Diffusion Pathways of Three Ecovillage Projects , 2015 .

[39]  Hermann Schmitt,et al.  Dynamic Representation , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[40]  Rebecca L Utz,et al.  The effect of widowhood on older adults' social participation: an evaluation of activity, disengagement, and continuity theories. , 2002, The Gerontologist.

[41]  Chris J. Martin.  The sharing economy: : A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? , 2016 .

[42]  B. Checkoway.  Large builders, federal housing programmes, and postwar suburbanization , 1980 .

[43]  M. Neuman.  The Compact City Fallacy , 2005 .

[44]  Jo Williams,et al.  Sun, surf and sustainable housing—cohousing, the Californian experience , 2005 .

[45]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States , 1994 .

[46]  Lidewij Tummers,et al.  Understanding co-housing from a planning perspective: why and how? , 2015 .

[47]  S. Zahran,et al.  The carbon implications of declining household scale economies , 2015 .

[48]  Toke Haunstrup,et al.  Sustainable Living and Co-Housing: Evidence from a Case Study of Eco-Villages , 2015 .

[49]  M. Baldassare,et al.  The Complexity of Public Attitudes Toward Compact Development , 2010 .