Responsible innovation assessment tools: a systematic review and research agenda

PurposeResponsible innovation assessment tools (RIATs) are key instruments that can help organizations, associations and individuals measure responsible innovation. Accordingly, this study aims to review the current status of research on responsible innovation and, in particular, of studies that either present the relevance of RIATs or provide empirical evidence of their adoption.Design/methodology/approachA systematic literature review is conducted to identify and review how RIATs are being addressed in academic research and the applications that are proposed. A systematic process is implemented using the Web of Science and Scopus bibliographic databases, aiming not only to summarize existing studies, but also to include a perspective on gaps and future research.FindingsA total of 119 publications were identified and included in the review process. The study identifies that RIATs have attracted growing interest from the scientific community, with a greater predominance of studies involving qualitative and mixed methods. A well-balanced mix of conceptual and exploratory studies is also registered, with a greater predominance of analysis of RIATs application domains in the past years, with greater incidence in the finance, water, energy, construction, manufacturing and health sectors.Originality/valueThis study is pioneering in identifying 16 dimensions and 60 sub-dimensions for measuring responsible innovation. It also suggests the need to include multidimensional perspectives and individuals with interdisciplinary competencies in this process.

[1]  Bernd Carsten STAHL,et al.  Responsible innovation ecosystems: Ethical implications of the application of the ecosystem concept to artificial intelligence , 2022, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[2]  H. Rao,et al.  User Privacy, Surveillance and Public Health during COVID-19 – An Examination of Twitterverse , 2022, Information systems frontiers : a journal of research and innovation.

[3]  Louis Moustakas A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Social Cohesion from 1994-2020 , 2022, Publ..

[4]  A. Mohammadi Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI): Scientometric Analysis , 2021, European Public & Social Innovation Review.

[5]  Kathleen Rodenburg,et al.  SDGs: A Responsible Research Assessment Tool toward Impactful Business Research , 2021, Sustainability.

[6]  J. Füller,et al.  Open Circular Innovation: How Companies Can Develop Circular Innovations in Collaboration with Stakeholders , 2021, Sustainability.

[7]  S. Mamonov,et al.  The role of IT in organizational innovation - A systematic literature review , 2021, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[8]  C. Lockwood,et al.  Teams for sustainability of evidence implementation. , 2021, JBI evidence implementation.

[9]  Ilse Svensson de Jong Misfit? The Use of Metrics in Innovation , 2021, Journal of Risk and Financial Management.

[10]  Grzegorz Baran,et al.  Digital Platform Ecosystems as Living Labs for Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Innovation: A Conceptual Model Proposal , 2021, Sustainability.

[11]  Tilimbe Jiya Responsible Data Governance in Projects: Applying a Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Framework , 2021, Journal of technology management & innovation.

[12]  S. Kraus,et al.  Innovation and the circular economy: A systematic literature review , 2021, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[13]  Z. Kwee,et al.  Responsible research and innovation in practice an exploratory assessment of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in a Nanomedicine Project , 2021, Journal of Responsible Technology.

[14]  Sami G. Al-Ghamdi,et al.  Sustainability assessment, potentials and challenges of 3D printed concrete structures: A systematic review for built environmental applications , 2021 .

[15]  F. Almeida Innovative response initiatives in the European Union to mitigate the effects of COVID-19 , 2021 .

[16]  Meeta Dasgupta Sustainable innovation initiatives by small and medium enterprises: a systematic literature review , 2021, Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship.

[17]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews , 2020, BMJ.

[18]  Ruth V. Aguilera,et al.  Stakeholder Governance for Responsible Innovation: A Theory of Value Creation, Appropriation, and Distribution , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[19]  Agata Gurzawska Responsible Innovation in Business: Perceptions, Evaluation Practices and Lessons Learnt , 2021 .

[20]  Salim Karimi Takalo,et al.  Green innovation: A systematic literature review , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[21]  P. Lehoux,et al.  The responsible innovation in health tool and the need to reconcile formative and summative ends in RRI tools for business , 2020, Journal of Responsible Innovation.

[22]  K. Bruynseels Responsible innovation in synthetic biology in response to COVID-19: the role of data positionality , 2020, Ethics and Information Technology.

[23]  Ludovico Iovino,et al.  A Flexible Architecture for Key Performance Indicators Assessment in Smart Cities , 2020, ECSA.

[24]  D. Bochtis,et al.  Sustainability Assessment of Investments Based on a Multiple Criteria Methodological Framework , 2020, Sustainability.

[25]  M. Schofield,et al.  Designing Responsible Innovation Ecosystems for the Mobilisation of Resources from Business and Finance to Accelerate the Implementation of Sustainability. A View from Industry , 2020, Journal of Sustainability Research.

[26]  Z. Kwee,et al.  Learning to do responsible innovation in industry: six lessons , 2020, Journal of Responsible Innovation.

[27]  Jörg Thomä,et al.  Interactive learning — The key to innovation in non-R&D-intensive SMEs? A cluster analysis approach , 2020, Journal of Small Business Management.

[28]  Andrea Mendoza-Silva Innovation capability: a systematic literature review , 2020, European Journal of Innovation Management.

[29]  P. Lehoux,et al.  Fostering Responsible Innovation in Health: An EvidenceInformed Assessment Tool for Innovation Stakeholders. , 2020, International journal of health policy and management.

[30]  P. Macnaghten,et al.  The design and testing of a tool for developing responsible innovation in start-up enterprises , 2020, Journal of Responsible Innovation.

[31]  Refaat H. Abdel-Razek,et al.  How changing organizational culture can enhance innovation: Development of the innovative culture enhancement framework , 2020 .

[32]  M. I. Malik,et al.  Towards innovation, co-creation and customers’ satisfaction: a banking sector perspective , 2019 .

[33]  Gunter Saake,et al.  Automated Selection and Quality Assessment of Primary Studies , 2019, ACM J. Data Inf. Qual..

[34]  F. Almeida,et al.  Measuring innovation through a crowd source initiative , 2019, International Journal of Innovation Science.

[35]  Mauricio Marrone,et al.  Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses , 2019, Australian Journal of Management.

[36]  B. Melnikas,et al.  Operationalising Responsible Research and Innovation – tools for enterprises , 2019, Engineering Management in Production and Services.

[37]  Saulo Cardoso Maia,et al.  Mapping the literature on credit unions: a bibliometric investigation grounded in Scopus and Web of Science , 2019, Scientometrics.

[38]  Zhenzhen Zhao,et al.  Idea Crowdsourcing for Innovation: Fundamentals and Recommendations , 2019, Management & Data Science.

[39]  Onno S. W. F. Omta,et al.  Responsible innovation by social entrepreneurs: an exploratory study of values integration in innovations , 2019, Journal of Responsible Innovation.

[40]  H. Torgersen,et al.  Precaution, Responsible Innovation and Beyond – In Search of a Sustainable Agricultural Biotechnology Policy , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[41]  Antonio Messineo,et al.  How can life cycle thinking support sustainability of buildings? Investigating life cycle assessment applications for energy efficiency and environmental performance , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[42]  Vicente Coll-Serrano,et al.  Diseño de una plataforma interactiva de autoevaluación para la integración de sectores culturales y creativos en estrategias de desarrollo regional: CreativeMed Toolkit , 2018 .

[43]  Muhd Zaimi Abd Majid,et al.  Assessment framework for pavement material and technology elements in green highway index , 2018 .

[44]  P. Chatzoglou,et al.  The role of innovation in building competitive advantages: an empirical investigation , 2018 .

[45]  O. Franco,et al.  Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study , 2017, Systematic Reviews.

[46]  Yu Xiao,et al.  Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review , 2017 .

[47]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  The Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Maturity Model: Linking Theory and Practice , 2017 .

[48]  Christian Voegtlin,et al.  Responsible Innovation and the Innovation of Responsibility: Governing Sustainable Development in a Globalized World , 2017 .

[49]  Onno S. W. F. Omta,et al.  Lessons for Responsible Innovation in the Business Context: A Systematic Literature Review of Responsible, Social and Sustainable Innovation Practices , 2017 .

[50]  M. Leone,et al.  The relevance of Innovation for Ethics, Responsibility and Sustainability , 2017 .

[51]  Margus Pedaste,et al.  Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review , 2017, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[52]  F. Song,et al.  The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[53]  Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville,et al.  Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research , 2016 .

[54]  Minna Saunila,et al.  Performance measurement approach for innovation capability in SMEs , 2016 .

[55]  Fern Wickson,et al.  Standardising Responsibility? The Significance of Interstitial Spaces , 2015, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[56]  Suvi Nenonen,et al.  Managing Co‐Creation Design: A Strategic Approach to Innovation , 2015 .

[57]  Fern Wickson,et al.  Quality criteria and indicators for responsible research and innovation: learning from transdisciplinarity , 2014 .

[58]  J. Stilgoe,et al.  Developing a framework for responsible innovation* , 2013, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[59]  F. Boons,et al.  Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview , 2013 .

[60]  Urbancová Hana Competitive Advantage Achievement through Innovation and Knowledge , 2013 .

[61]  L Posthuma,et al.  State of the art of contaminated site management in The Netherlands: policy framework and risk assessment tools. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[62]  S. Janssen,et al.  Using performance measures conceptually in innovation control , 2011 .

[63]  Robert L. Harrison,et al.  Mixed methods designs in marketing research , 2011 .

[64]  Alka Roy,et al.  The Responsible Innovation Framework: A Framework for Integrating Trust and Delight into Technology Innovation , 2021, HICSS.

[65]  E. Thorstensen Responsibility for Assistive Technologies : Product Assessment Frameworks and Responsible Research and Innovation , 2019 .

[66]  Łukasz Nazarko,et al.  Future-Oriented Technology Assessment☆ , 2017 .

[67]  Stephanie M Swanberg GOOGLE SCHOLAR AND SCOPUS FOR FINDING GRAY LITERATURE PUBLICATIONS , 2016 .

[68]  N Mills,et al.  Environmental & economic life cycle assessment of current & future sewage sludge to energy technologies. , 2014, Waste management.

[69]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.