Comparisons of tibial accelerations when walking on a wood composite vs. a concrete mezzanine surface.

Mezzanine surfaces can be made from concrete, bar grate, or composite materials. Anecdotal data indicate that mezzanines in distribution centers made from composite materials, due to their increased compliance, may be a more comfortable working surface. Prior research suggested that a measure of tibial shock, peak tibial acceleration, could potentially discriminate the biomechanical differences between these surfaces. The objective of this study was to quantify differences in tibial accelerations as 27 people walked on mezzanines constructed from concrete and a wood composite material. Accelerometers were attached bilaterally to the shins of volunteers, and data were collected as they walked 30.5 m on each surface at their normal walking speed, a faster-than-normal walking speed, and a slower-than-normal walking speed. Peak acceleration values obtained from the leg with the highest values were compared. On average, the peak acceleration values were 5% higher on the concrete mezzanine as compared with the wood composite mezzanine (p = .036). These findings suggest that individuals working on mezzanines in distribution centers constructed from composite surfaces would potentially experience less discomfort associated with long exposure periods on these surfaces.

[1]  V. Stiles,et al.  Biomechanical response to systematic changes in impact interface cushioning properties while performing a tennis-specific movement , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[2]  Phyllis M. King,et al.  Relationship of Demographic Variables on Perception of Fatigue and Discomfort Following Prolonged Standing Under Various Flooring Conditions , 2004, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[3]  D. Melzer,et al.  Common health predictors of early retirement: findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. , 2011, Age and ageing.

[4]  Bryan Heiderscheit,et al.  Effect of cushioned insoles on impact forces during running. , 2008, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[5]  J. Shiao,et al.  Risk Factors for Musculoskeletal Discomfort in Nurses , 2006, The journal of nursing research : JNR.

[6]  B M Nigg,et al.  Impact Forces and Muscle Tuning: A New Paradigm , 2001, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[7]  M. Whittle,et al.  Generation and attenuation of transient impulsive forces beneath the foot: a review. , 1999, Gait & posture.

[8]  M S Redfern,et al.  The influence of flooring on standing comfort and fatigue. , 2000, AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[9]  Jukka S Jurvelin,et al.  Reproducibility of loading measurements with skin-mounted accelerometers during walking. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  K. Rampal,et al.  The prevalence of musculoskeletal problems and risk factors among women assembly workers in the semiconductor industry. , 2003, The Medical journal of Malaysia.

[11]  Mark S. Redfern,et al.  Effect of Flooring on Standing Comfort and Fatigue , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[12]  B. Higginson,et al.  Methods of Running Gait Analysis , 2009, Current sports medicine reports.

[13]  Joseph Hamill,et al.  Kinematic adaptations during running: effects of footwear, surface, and duration. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  M J Lake,et al.  Determining the protective function of sports footwear , 2000, Ergonomics.

[15]  B. Nigg,et al.  The effect of muscle stiffness and damping on simulated impact force peaks during running. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.