Advanced Mobility Testbed for Dynamic Semi-Autonomous Unmanned Ground Vehicles

Abstract : Integrated simulation capabilities that are high-fidelity, fast, and have scalable architecture are essential to support autonomous vehicle design and performance assessment for the U.S. Army's growing use of unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs). With increased onboard autonomy, advanced vehicle models are needed to analyze and optimize control design and sensor packages over a range of urban and off-road scenarios. Recent work at US Army TARDEC has attempted to develop a high-fidelity mobility simulation of an autonomous vehicle in an off-road scenario using integrated sensor, controller, and multi-body dynamics models. The conclusion was that (a) real-time simulation was not feasible due to the complexity of the intervening formulation, (b) models had to be simplified to speed up the simulation, (c) interfacing the sensors was exceedingly difficult due to co-simulation, (d) the controls developed were very basic and could not be optimized, and (e) a rigid terrain model was used. The research described in this paper is from a collaborative project between US Army TARDEC and NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) to develop an advanced UGV mobility testbed using JPL's ROAMS vehicle modeling capability [2] and to address the aforementioned issues in meeting the US Army's UGV modeling and simulation needs. The ROAMS ground vehicle simulation framework can support tasks ranging from real-time embedded hardware- in-the-loop testing to large-scale Monte Carlo simulation based parametric studies. ROAMS has been successfully used at JPL in several space mission-critical scenarios for NASA across multiple domains (cruise/orbiter, landers, and rovers). ROAMS is unique in its integrated approach to handling the high-fidelity dynamics, sensors, environ- ment, control, and autonomy models that are required for such highly complex missions and are key attributes of future Army unmanned ground vehicles.

[1]  Hao Li,et al.  Analysis of Off-Road Tire-Soil Interaction through Analytical and Finite Element Methods , 2013 .

[2]  Tulga Ersal,et al.  A Multi-Stage Optimization Formulation for MPC-Based Obstacle Avoidance in Autonomous Vehicles Using a LIDAR Sensor , 2014 .

[3]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Designing for Flexible Interaction Between Humans and Automation: Delegation Interfaces for Supervisory Control , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Sterling J. Anderson,et al.  An optimal-control-based framework for trajectory planning, threat assessment, and semi-autonomous control of passenger vehicles in hazard avoidance scenarios , 2010 .

[5]  Jo Yung Wong,et al.  Theory of ground vehicles , 1978 .

[6]  Damian Harty,et al.  The Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics , 2004 .

[7]  Ingobert C. Schmid,et al.  Interaction of vehicle and terrain results from 10 years research at IKK , 1995 .

[8]  Abhinandan Jain,et al.  A Constraint Embedding Approach for Complex Vehicle Suspension Dynamics , 2015 .

[9]  Frank Flemisch,et al.  Towards a dynamic balance between humans and automation: authority, ability, responsibility and control in shared and cooperative control situations , 2012, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[10]  Magnus Egerstedt,et al.  Autonomous driving in urban environments: approaches, lessons and challenges , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[11]  Hans B. Pacejka,et al.  Tyre Modelling for Use in Vehicle Dynamics Studies , 1987 .

[12]  Abhinandan Jain,et al.  Multibody graph transformations and analysis , 2011, Nonlinear Dynamics.

[13]  William Bombardier,et al.  Symbolic Modelling and Simulation of Wheeled Vehicle Systems on Three-Dimensional Roads , 2009 .

[14]  Feng Zhou,et al.  Simulations of Mars Rover Traverses , 2014, J. Field Robotics.

[15]  Jonathan Cameron,et al.  Real-time and high-fidelity simulation environment for autonomous ground vehicle dynamics , 2013 .

[16]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[17]  M. G. Bekker Introduction to Terrain-Vehicle Systems , 1969 .

[18]  Reinhold von Schwerin MultiBody System SIMulation - Numerical Methods, Algorithms, and Software , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering.

[19]  Edward Mottern,et al.  Challenges to autonomous navigation in complex urban terrain , 2012, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[20]  Huei Peng,et al.  Fast analytical models of wheeled locomotion in deformable terrain for mobile robots , 2013, Robotica.

[21]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  Human Performance Issues and User Interface Design for Teleoperated Robots , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[22]  Abhinandan Jain Robot and Multibody Dynamics: Analysis and Algorithms , 2010 .

[23]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[24]  Kazuya Yoshida,et al.  Terramechanics‐based model for steering maneuver of planetary exploration rovers on loose soil , 2007, J. Field Robotics.

[25]  Paramsothy Jayakumar,et al.  Development of High Fidelity Mobility Simulation of an Autonomous Vehicle in an Off-Road Scenario Using Integrated Sensor, Controller, and Multi-Body Dynamics , 2011 .

[26]  Dario D. Salvucci Modeling Driver Behavior in a Cognitive Architecture , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[27]  Abhinandan Jain,et al.  ROAMS: planetary surface rover simulation environment , 2003 .

[28]  Keith Redmill,et al.  Systems for Safety and Autonomous Behavior in Cars: The DARPA Grand Challenge Experience , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.