Random cell association and void probability in poisson-distributed cellular networks

This paper studied the fundamental modeling defect existing in Poisson-distributed cellular networks in which all base stations form a homogeneous Poisson point process (PPP) of intensity λB and all users form another independent PPP of intensity λU. The modeling defect, hardly discovered in prior works, is the void cell issue that stems from the independence between the distributions of users and BSs and “user-centric” cell association, and it could give rise to very inaccurate analytical results. We showed that the void probability of a cell under generalized random cell association is always bounded above zero and its theoretical lower bound is exp (-λU/λB) that can be achieved by large association weighting. An accurate expression of the void probability of a cell was derived and simulation results validated its correctness. We also showed that the associated BSs are essentially no longer a PPP such that modeling them as a PPP to facilitate the analysis of interference-related performance metrics may detach from reality if the BS intensity is not significantly large if compared with the user intensity.

[1]  François Baccelli,et al.  Stochastic geometry and wireless networks , 2009 .

[2]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of K-Tier Downlink Heterogeneous Cellular Networks , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[3]  T. Mattfeldt Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1996 .

[4]  Kaibin Huang,et al.  Coverage and Economy of Cellular Networks with Many Base Stations , 2012, IEEE Communications Letters.

[5]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  On the Accuracy of the Wyner Model in Cellular Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[6]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  On distances in uniformly random networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[7]  Gordon L. Stuber,et al.  Principles of Mobile Communication , 1996 .

[8]  Shuguang Cui,et al.  Optimal Discrete Power Control in Poisson-Clustered Ad Hoc Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[9]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  A Tractable Approach to Coverage and Rate in Cellular Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[10]  Khaled Ben Letaief,et al.  Throughput and Energy Efficiency Analysis of Small Cell Networks with Multi-Antenna Base Stations , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Aaron D. Wyner,et al.  Shannon-theoretic approach to a Gaussian cellular multiple-access channel , 1994, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Z. Néda,et al.  On the size-distribution of Poisson Voronoi cells , 2004, cond-mat/0406116.

[13]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1989 .

[14]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1989 .

[15]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  On the Accuracy of the Wyner Model in Downlink Cellular Networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[16]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Stochastic geometry and random graphs for the analysis and design of wireless networks , 2009, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[17]  Gordon L. Stuber,et al.  Principles of mobile communication (2nd ed.) , 2001 .

[18]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Joint Resource Partitioning and Offloading in Heterogeneous Cellular Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[19]  Marco Di Renzo,et al.  Average Rate of Downlink Heterogeneous Cellular Networks over Generalized Fading Channels: A Stochastic Geometry Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[20]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Downlink Coordinated Multi-Point with Overhead Modeling in Heterogeneous Cellular Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[21]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Heterogeneous Cellular Networks with Flexible Cell Association: A Comprehensive Downlink SINR Analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.