Transfer of learned perception of sensorimotor simultaneity

Synchronizing a motor response to a predictable sensory stimulus, like a periodic flash or click, relies on feedback (somesthetic, auditory, visual, or other) from the motor response. Practically, this results in a small (<50 ms) asynchrony in which the motor response leads the sensory event. Here we show that the perceived simultaneity in a coincidence-anticipation task (line crossing) is affected by changing the perceived simultaneity in a different task (pacing). In the pace task, human subjects were instructed to press a key in perfect synchrony with a red square flashed every second. In training sessions, feedback was provided by flashing a blue square with each key press, below the red square. There were two types of training pace sessions: one in which the feedback was provided with no delay, the other (adapting), in which the feedback was progressively delayed (up to 100 ms). Subjects’ asynchrony was unchanged in the first case, but it was significantly increased in the pace task with delay. In the coincidence-anticipation task, a horizontally moving vertical bar crossed a vertical line in the middle of a screen. Subjects were instructed to press a key exactly when the bar crossed the line. They were given no feedback on their performance. Asynchrony on the line-crossing task was tested after the training pace task with feedback. We found that this asynchrony to be significantly increased even though there never was any feedback on the coincidence-anticipation task itself. Subjects were not aware that their sensorimotor asynchrony had been lengthened (sometimes doubled). We conclude that perception of simultaneity in a sensorimotor task is learned. If this perception is caused by coincidence of signals in the brain, the timing of these signals depends on something—acquired by experience—more adaptable than physiological latencies.

[1]  B. Repp Control of Expressive and Metronomic Timing in Pianists. , 1999, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  Mahmood R. Azimi-Sadjadi,et al.  Rhythmic finger tapping to cosine-wave modulated metronome sequences: Evidence of subliminal entrainment , 1998 .

[3]  Gilles Montagne,et al.  The effects of enhanced visual feedback on human synchronization , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[4]  J Mates,et al.  Sensorimotor synchronization: the impact of temporally displaced auditory feedback. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[5]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[6]  B H Repp,et al.  Compensation for subliminal timing perturbations in perceptual-motor synchronization , 2000, Psychological research.

[7]  A. J. King,et al.  Integration of visual and auditory information in bimodal neurones in the guinea-pig superior colliculus , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Yôiti Suzuki,et al.  Implicit estimation of sound-arrival time , 2003, Nature.

[9]  S. Nishida,et al.  Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  P. Haggard,et al.  Voluntary action and conscious awareness , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  S. Shimojo,et al.  When Sound Affects Vision: Effects of Auditory Grouping on Visual Motion Perception , 2001, Psychological science.

[12]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactions , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  P R Killeen,et al.  Optimal timing and the Weber function. , 1987, Psychological review.

[14]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Tapping with peripheral nerve block. a role for tactile feedback in the timing of movements. , 2001, Experimental brain research.

[15]  P A Kolers,et al.  Rhythms and responses. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  J. Lewald,et al.  Auditory-visual temporal integration as a function of distance: no compensation for sound-transmission time in human perception , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Delayed auditory feedback in synchronization. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  James V. Stone,et al.  When is now? Perception of simultaneity , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  G. Aschersleben Temporal Control of Movements in Sensorimotor Synchronization , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[20]  R. Miall,et al.  Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 10.1007/s002219900286 RESEARCH ARTICLE , 2022 .

[21]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Spectral decomposition of variability in synchronization and continuation tapping: comparisons between auditory and visual pacing and feedback conditions. , 2002, Human movement science.

[22]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Synchronizing actions with events: The role of sensory information , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[24]  R. Ivry,et al.  Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: evidence for a common timing mechanism. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  G. Westheimer,et al.  A shift in the perceived simultaneity of adjacent visual stimuli following adaptation to stroboscopic motion along the same axis , 1985, Vision Research.

[26]  Jacques Paillard,et al.  III. - Quelques donnes psychophysiologiques relatives au dclenchement de la commande motrice , 1946 .

[27]  D. Cunningham,et al.  Sensorimotor Adaptation to Violations of Temporal Contiguity , 2001, Psychological science.

[28]  Robert A. Jacobs,et al.  Motor timing learned without motor training , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  T Radil,et al.  Cooperative tapping: Time control under different feedback conditions , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  J Mates,et al.  The Perceptual Centre of a Stimulus as the Cue for Synchronization to a Metronome: Evidence from Asynchronies , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.