Sliding direction dependence of polyethylene wear for metal counterface traverse of severe scratches.

Third-body effects appear to be responsible for an appreciable portion of the wear rate variability within cohorts of patients with metal-on-polyethylene joint replacements. The parameters dominating the rate of polyethylene debris liberation by counterface scratches are not fully understood, but one seemingly contributory factor is the scratch's orientation relative to the direction of instantaneous local surface sliding. To study this influence, arrays of 550 straight parallel scratches each representative of the severe end of the clinical range were diamond stylus-ruled onto the surface of polished stainless steel plates. These ruled plates were then worn reciprocally against polyethylene pins (both conventional and highly cross-linked) at traverse angles varied parametrically relative to the scratch direction. Wear was measured gravimetrically, and particulate debris was harvested and morphologically characterized. Both of the polyethylene variants tested showed pronounced wear rate peaks at acute scratch traverse angles (15 deg for conventional and 5 deg for cross-linked), and had nominally comparable absolute wear rate magnitudes. The particulate debris from this very aggressive test regime primarily consisted of extremely large and elongated strands, often tens or even hundreds of microns in length. These data suggest that counterface damage regions with preferential scratch directionality can liberate large amounts of polyethylene debris, apparently by a slicing/shearing mechanism, at critical (acute) attack angles. However, the predominant manifestation of this wear volume was in the form of particles far beyond the most osteolytically potent size range.

[1]  W H Harris,et al.  A novel method of cross-linking ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene to improve wear, reduce oxidation, and retain mechanical properties. Recipient of the 1999 HAP Paul Award. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  Murali Jasty,et al.  Third-body wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene in a hip simulator. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  Duncan Dowson,et al.  The role of counterface imperfections in the wear of polyethylene , 1987 .

[4]  K. Komvopoulos,et al.  Tribological and Nanomechanical Properties of Unmodified and Crosslinked Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene for Total Joint Replacements , 2004 .

[5]  M. Raimondi,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of the prosthetic head damage induced by microscopic third-body particles in total hip replacement. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[6]  T D Brown,et al.  Temporal and spatial distributions of directional counterface motion at the acetabular bearing surface in total hip arthroplasty. , 1998, The Iowa orthopaedic journal.

[7]  John J Callaghan,et al.  Local head roughening as a factor contributing to variability of total hip wear: a finite element analysis. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[8]  A. Edidin,et al.  A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  B. Wroblewski,et al.  Quantitative analysis of polyethylene wear debris, wear rate and head damage in retrieved Charnley hip prostheses , 2000, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[10]  F. Shen,et al.  Wear of gamma-crosslinked polyethylene acetabular cups against roughened femoral balls. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  J. Fisher,et al.  The prediction of polyethylene wear rate and debris morphology produced by microscopic asperities on femoral heads , 2000, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[12]  J. Davidson,et al.  Abrasive wear of ceramic, metal, and UHMWPE bearing surfaces from third-body bone, PMMA bone cement, and titanium debris. , 1994, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[13]  J. Fisher,et al.  Comparison of wear, wear debris and functional biological activity of moderately crosslinked and non-crosslinked polyethylenes in hip prostheses , 2002, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[14]  F. Shen,et al.  Surface-Gradient Cross-linked Polyethylene Acetabular Cups: Oxidation Resistance and Wear against Smooth and Rough Femoral Balls , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  Steven Kurtz,et al.  Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  E. A. Reeves,et al.  The Influence of Scratches to Metallic Counterfaces on the Wear of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene , 1995, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[17]  Karl Hans Moltrecht Machine-shop Practice , 1915, Nature.

[18]  L. Topoleski,et al.  Third-body wear of cobalt-chromium-molybdenum implant alloys initiated by bone and poly(methyl methacrylate) particles. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[19]  J H Dumbleton,et al.  Mechanistic and Morphological Origins of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Wear Debris in Total Joint Replacement Prostheses , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[20]  Brian J. Briscoe,et al.  Scratching maps for polymers , 1996 .

[21]  F. Kummer,et al.  Surface damage to an Oxinium femoral head prosthesis after dislocation. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[22]  Kyriakos Komvopoulos,et al.  Mechanical and Thermomechanical Elastic-Plastic Contact Analysis of Layered Media With Patterned Surfaces , 2004 .

[23]  S. Merhar,et al.  Letter to the editor , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[24]  A. Edidin,et al.  The wear of oriented UHMWPE under isotropically rough and scratched counterface test conditions. , 2001, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[25]  D. Pedersen,et al.  The John Charnley Award. Practice surveillance: a practical method to assess outcome and to perform clinical research. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  W H Harris,et al.  Analysis of the kinematics of different hip simulators used to study wear of candidate materials for the articulation of total hip arthroplasties , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[27]  J. Fisher,et al.  Comparative wear and wear debris under three different counterface conditions of crosslinked and non-crosslinked ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. , 2001, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[28]  F. Shen,et al.  Development of an extremely wear‐resistant ultra high molecular weight polythylene for total hip replacements , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[29]  C. Engh,et al.  Can component and patient factors account for the variance in wear rates among bilateral total hip arthroplasty patients? , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[30]  F. Müller,et al.  Transfer of metallic debris after dislocation of ceramic femoral heads in hip prostheses , 2006, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.