A Decision Support System for Diabetes Chronic Care Models Based on General Practitioner Engagement and EHR Data Sharing

Objective Decision support systems (DSS) have been developed and promoted for their potential to improve quality of health care. However, there is a lack of common clinical strategy and a poor management of clinical resources and erroneous implementation of preventive medicine. Methods To overcome this problem, this work proposed an integrated system that relies on the creation and sharing of a database extracted from GPs’ Electronic Health Records (EHRs) within the Netmedica Italian (NMI) cloud infrastructure. Although the proposed system is a pilot application specifically tailored for improving the chronic Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) care it could be easily targeted to effectively manage different chronic-diseases. The proposed DSS is based on EHR structure used by GPs in their daily activities following the most updated guidelines in data protection and sharing. The DSS is equipped with a Machine Learning (ML) method for analyzing the shared EHRs and thus tackling the high variability of EHRs. A novel set of T2D care-quality indicators are used specifically to determine the economic incentives and the T2D features are presented as predictors of the proposed ML approach. Results The EHRs from 41237 T2D patients were analyzed. No additional data collection, with respect to the standard clinical practice, was required. The DSS exhibited competitive performance (up to an overall accuracy of 98%±2% and macro-recall of 96%±1%) for classifying chronic care quality across the different follow-up phases. The chronic care quality model brought to a significant increase (up to 12%) of the T2D patients without complications. For GPs who agreed to use the proposed system, there was an economic incentive. A further bonus was assigned when performance targets are achieved. Conclusions The quality care evaluation in a clinical use-case scenario demonstrated how the empowerment of the GPs through the use of the platform (integrating the proposed DSS), along with the economic incentives, may speed up the improvement of care.

[1]  Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi,et al.  Securing the e-health cloud , 2010, IHI.

[2]  Matthew D. Davis,et al.  Retinopathy and nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes four years after a trial of intensive therapy. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Ming-Yie Jan,et al.  Radial Pulse Spectrum Analysis as Risk Markers to Improve the Risk Stratification of Silent Myocardial Ischemia in Type 2 Diabetic Patients , 2018, IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine.

[4]  P. Basch Quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. , 2003, New England Journal of Medicine.

[5]  Mary T Korytkowski,et al.  Use of an electronic health record to identify prevalent and incident cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes according to treatment strategy , 2016, BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care.

[6]  Carl van Walraven,et al.  The accuracy of using integrated electronic health care data to identify patients with undiagnosed diabetes mellitus. , 2012, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[7]  V. Hasselblad,et al.  Effect of Clinical Decision-Support Systems , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  Yu Tian,et al.  A Shared Decision-Making System for Diabetes Medication Choice Utilizing Electronic Health Record Data , 2017, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[9]  Suzette J. Bielinski,et al.  Use of diverse electronic medical record systems to identify genetic risk for type 2 diabetes within a genome-wide association study , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  E. Ewen,et al.  Electronic health record use to classify patients with newly diagnosed versus preexisting type 2 diabetes: infrastructure for comparative effectiveness research and population health management. , 2012, Population health management.

[11]  Ya Zhang,et al.  A machine learning-based framework to identify type 2 diabetes through electronic health records , 2017, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[12]  Tim Nolan,et al.  International Diabetes Federation. , 2013, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[13]  J. Shaw,et al.  Global trends in diabetes complications: a review of current evidence , 2018, Diabetologia.

[14]  Karim Keshavjee,et al.  Individualized electronic decision support and reminders to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[15]  D. Bates,et al.  Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[16]  Lei Ye,et al.  Medical Information Integration Based Cloud Computing , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Network Computing and Information Security.

[17]  Jeffrey S McCullough,et al.  Health information technology and patient safety: evidence from panel data. , 2009, Health affairs.

[18]  Fabrizio L. Ricci,et al.  Secondary uses of EHR systems: A feasibility study , 2013, 2013 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB).

[19]  A. Hussain,et al.  Knowledge based system framework for managing chronic diseases based on service oriented architecture , 2012, 2012 8th International Conference on Information Science and Digital Content Technology (ICIDT2012).

[20]  Tapio Heikkilä,et al.  Designing Autonomous Robot Systems - Evaluation of the R3-COP Decision Support System Approach , 2013, DECS@SAFECOMP.

[21]  Changhao Yan,et al.  A Practical Electronic Health Record-Based Dry Weight Supervision Model for Hemodialysis Patients , 2019, IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine.

[22]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[23]  Emanuele Frontoni,et al.  Discovering the Type 2 Diabetes in Electronic Health Records Using the Sparse Balanced Support Vector Machine , 2020, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[24]  Xi Jin,et al.  A cloud computing solution for Hospital Information System , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems.

[25]  Terhilda Garrido,et al.  The Kaiser Permanente Electronic Health Record: transforming and streamlining modalities of care. , 2009, Health affairs.

[26]  Emanuele Frontoni,et al.  Sharing health data among general practitioners: The Nu.Sa. project , 2019, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[27]  Yasunobu Ito,et al.  Improving the effectiveness of interprofessional work teams using EHR-based Data in the treatment of chronic diseases: An action research study , 2014, Proceedings of PICMET '14 Conference: Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology; Infrastructure and Service Integration.

[28]  Subhash C. Bagui,et al.  Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms , 2005, Technometrics.

[29]  Emanuele Frontoni,et al.  Early temporal prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Risk Condition from a General Practitioner Electronic Health Record: A Multiple Instance Boosting Approach , 2020, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[30]  Uk-Prospective-Diabetes-Study-Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) , 1998, The Lancet.

[31]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[32]  Rüdiger Zarnekow,et al.  Security and Privacy System Requirements for Adopting Cloud Computing in Healthcare Data Sharing Scenarios , 2013, AMCIS.

[33]  G. Boysen,et al.  European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention , 2009, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[34]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Comparison of body mass index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio in predicting incident diabetes: a meta-analysis. , 2007, Epidemiologic reviews.

[35]  R. Holman,et al.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. , 1998 .

[36]  N. Powe,et al.  Clinical information technologies and inpatient outcomes: a multiple hospital study. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[37]  Norman D. Black,et al.  Feature selection and classification model construction on type 2 diabetic patients' data , 2007, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[38]  Helen X. Gao,et al.  American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2017 , 2017, Journal of diabetes.

[39]  Emanuele Frontoni,et al.  TyG-er: An ensemble Regression Forest approach for identification of clinical factors related to insulin resistance condition using Electronic Health Records , 2019, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[40]  María Teresa Arredondo,et al.  Integration of Personalized Healthcare Pathways in an ICT Platform for Diabetes Managements: A Small-Scale Exploratory Study , 2016, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[41]  Stefan Thurner,et al.  Improving the informational continuity of care in diabetes mellitus treatment with a nationwide Shared EHR system: Estimates from Austrian claims data , 2016, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[42]  Neil Skolnik,et al.  Pharmacologic Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes: Synopsis of the 2017 American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes , 2017, Annals of Internal Medicine..

[43]  Christopher G. Chute,et al.  The absence of longitudinal data limits the accuracy of high-throughput clinical phenotyping for identifying type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.