Poly(lactic acid)-based Composites Incorporated with Spent Coffee Ground and Tea Leave for Food Packaging Application: A Waste to Wealth

Polymer composites of polylactic acid (PLA) and polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT) incorporated with spent coffee grounds (SCG) and tea leave (TL) were prepared by two-roll mill mixer. 4,4-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), toluene 2,4-diisocyanate (TDI), and bis[3-(triethoxysilyl) propyl] tetrasulfide (TESPT) were used as coupling agents. The influences of coupling agent types, coupling agent content, and weight ratios of polymer to filler on the mechanical properties, melt flow index, and overall migration (OM) of the composites were studied. The results showed that MDI and TDI had better performance compared to TESPT for both tensile and elongation at break. The tensile strength and elongation at break of PLA+PBAT/SCG composites with weight ratio of polymer to filler = 70/30 increased from 19.6 MPa to ∼23.0 to 25.0 MPa, and 6.6 to ∼10.0%, respectively when using these coupling agents (MDI and TDI) of 3 g/100 g polymers. Moreover, the addition of MDI and TDI greatly increased the viscosity of the melted composites (4-fold), while TESPT made the viscosity decrease. However, the mechanical properties of the composites decreased drastically with increasing SCG proportion. Compared to PLA+PBAT/SCG, interfacial adhesion of PLA+PBAT/TL was higher confirming by tensile strength and SEM images. However, there was no significant difference between PLA+PBAT/TL and PLA+PBAT/SCG composites in terms of elongation at break, impact strength and melt flow index. The OM of PLA+PBAT/SCG and PLA+PBAT/TL composites with coupling agents were in the range of ∼0.03–0.28 mg/dm2 when using 3% acetic acid and 10% ethanol as food simulants, which not excess the migration limit (10 mg/dm2) according to Food Contact Materials EU No. 10/2011 legislation. It means that they might be safe for use as food contact materials for packaging and containers.

[1]  M. Raji,et al.  Thermo-mechanical performances of polypropylene biocomposites based on untreated, treated and compatibilized spent coffee grounds , 2018, Composites Part B: Engineering.

[2]  A. Dufresne,et al.  Sustainable biodegradable coffee grounds filler and its effect on the hydrophobicity, mechanical and thermal properties of biodegradable PBAT composites , 2017 .

[3]  Chin-San Wu Renewable resource-based green composites of surface-treated spent coffee grounds and polylactide: Characterisation and biodegradability , 2015 .

[4]  R. Balart,et al.  Green composites based on polypropylene matrix and hydrophobized spend coffee ground (SCG) powder , 2015 .

[5]  Guangmei Xia,et al.  Preparation and Properties of Biodegradable Spent Tea Leaf Powder/Poly(Propylene Carbonate) Composite Films , 2015 .

[6]  R. Rodrigues,et al.  Migration of conventional and new plasticizers from PVC films into food simulants: A comparative study , 2014 .

[7]  I. Khan,et al.  CHAPTER 16:Micro and Nano Calcium Carbonate Filled Natural Rubber Composites and Nanocomposites , 2013 .

[8]  Ji-won Park,et al.  Development and Application of Green Composites: Using Coffee Ground and Bamboo Flour , 2013, Journal of Polymers and the Environment.

[9]  S. Bistac,et al.  Influence of fillers content on the viscosity of unsaturated polyester resin/calcium carbonate blends , 2012 .

[10]  J. L. Alves,et al.  Coffee Powder Reused as a Composite Material , 2017 .

[11]  Seung‐Hwan Lee,et al.  Biodegradable polymers/bamboo fiber biocomposite with bio-based coupling agent , 2006 .