Effects of Multipath Attenuation in the Optical Communication-Based Internet of Underwater Things

The propagation of light underwater is tied closely to the optical properties of water. In particular, the underwater channel imposes attenuation on the optical signal in the form of scattering, absorption, and turbulence. These attenuation factors can lead to severe spatial and temporal dispersion, which restricts communication to a limited range and bandwidth. In this paper, we propose a statistical model to estimate the probability density function of the temporal dispersion in underwater wireless optical communication (UWOC) based Internet of Underwater Things (IoUTs) using discrete histograms. The underwater optical channel is modeled using Monte Carlo simulations, and the effects of temporal dispersion are presented by measuring the magnitude response of the channel in terms of received power. The temporal response analysis is followed by an extensive performance evaluation in terms of bit error rate (BER). To facilitate in-depth theoretical analysis, we have measured and presented magnitude response and BER of the channel under different field-of-views (FoVs), apertures, and water types. The three main areas under study are (i) BER versus link distance behavior, (ii) temporal response of the channel, and (iii) effect of scattering on photon travel. Our study shows the two main factors that contribute to beam spreading and temporal dispersion are (i) diffusivity of the optical source and (ii) multiple scattering. Furthermore, our results suggest that temporal dispersion caused due to multiple scattering cannot be mitigated completely; however, it can be minimized by optimizing the receiver aperture.

[1]  L Wang,et al.  MCML--Monte Carlo modeling of light transport in multi-layered tissues. , 1995, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[2]  Linda Mullen,et al.  Experimental measurements of the magnitude and phase response of high-frequency modulated light underwater. , 2017, Applied optics.

[3]  F. Hanson,et al.  High bandwidth underwater optical communication. , 2008, Applied optics.

[4]  Palanisamy Shanmugam,et al.  A theoretical study on the impact of particle scattering on the channel characteristics of underwater optical communication system , 2018 .

[5]  Linda Mullen,et al.  Temporal dispersion in underwater laser communication links: Closing the loop between model and experiment , 2016, 2016 IEEE Third Underwater Communications and Networking Conference (UComms).

[6]  B. Cochenour,et al.  Spatial and temporal dispersion in high bandwidth underwater laser communication links , 2008, MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[7]  John Muth,et al.  Simulating channel losses in an underwater optical communication system. , 2014, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  Muhammad M. Hussain,et al.  Marine IoT: non-invasive wearable multisensory platform for oceanic environment monitoring , 2019, 2019 IEEE 5th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT).

[9]  T. J. Petzold Volume Scattering Functions for Selected Ocean Waters , 1972 .

[10]  Manuel Abreu,et al.  Experimental and simulation assessments of underwater light propagation , 2019, Frontiers of Optoelectronics.

[11]  Robert A. Leathers,et al.  Monte Carlo Radiative Transfer Simulations for Ocean Optics: A Practical Guide , 2004 .

[12]  Linda Mullen,et al.  Temporal Response of the Underwater Optical Channel for High-Bandwidth Wireless Laser Communications , 2013, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[13]  Roger J. Green,et al.  Impact of receiver field of view on underwater optical wireless communications , 2017 .

[14]  Zixian Wei,et al.  Wearable Full-Duplex Digital Transceiver for Underwater Optical Wireless Communications , 2018, 2018 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Pacific Rim (CLEO-PR).

[15]  David V. Thiel,et al.  Second Generation Swimming Feedback Device Using a Wearable Data Processing System based on Underwater Visible Light Communication , 2013 .

[16]  Anton Umek,et al.  Wearable Sensor Devices for Prevention and Rehabilitation in Healthcare: Swimming Exercise With Real-Time Therapist Feedback , 2019, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[17]  D. W. Scott On optimal and data based histograms , 1979 .

[18]  Mohammad-Ali Khalighi,et al.  Channel modeling for underwater optical communication , 2011, 2011 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[19]  Valentina Camomilla,et al.  Trends Supporting the In-Field Use of Wearable Inertial Sensors for Sport Performance Evaluation: A Systematic Review , 2018, Sensors.

[20]  B.M. Cochenour,et al.  Characterization of the Beam-Spread Function for Underwater Wireless Optical Communications Links , 2008, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[21]  Hongyu Zhao,et al.  Swimming Motion Analysis and Posture Recognition Based on Wearable Inertial Sensors , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC).

[22]  Yuhan Dong,et al.  General Stochastic Channel Model and Performance Evaluation for Underwater Wireless Optical Links , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[23]  Chien-Chi Kao,et al.  A Comprehensive Study on the Internet of Underwater Things: Applications, Challenges, and Channel Models † , 2017, Sensors.

[24]  Sermsak Jaruwatanadilok,et al.  Underwater Wireless Optical Communication Channel Modeling and Performance Evaluation using Vector Radiative Transfer Theory , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[25]  Cheng Xu,et al.  Influence of Temporal Dispersion on the Undersea Wireless Optical Communication and Its Mitigation using MLSE , 2018, OCEANS 2018 MTS/IEEE Charleston.

[26]  Sara Ayub,et al.  Monte Carlo-based channel estimation and performance evaluation for UWOC links under geometric losses , 2018, Int. J. Commun. Syst..

[27]  Chiara Petrioli,et al.  The Internet of Underwater Things: From Nemo to underwater Whatsapp , 2019, MobiHoc.