Composites for Timber-Replacement Bearers in Railway Switches and Crossings

Recent developments in composite materials have resulted in their pilot adoption in railway industry, such as ‘fibre-reinforced foamed urethane (FFU)’, ‘geopolymer concrete’, ‘recycled polymer’, and ‘CarbonLoc composite’. Railway track support systems are critical for safe and reliable operations of railway tracks. There are two types of support structures, which can be designed to be either a slab or a cluster of discrete bearers or sleepers. The choice of turnout support system depends on asset management strategy of the rail operators or maintainers. The aim of this paper is to present the criteria, fundamental and multi-disciplinary issues for the design and practical selection of composite materials in railway turnout systems. As a case study, a full-scale trial to investigate in-situ behaviours of a turnout grillage system using an alternative material, ‘fibre-reinforced foamed urethane (FFU)’ bearers, is presented. Influences of the composite bearers on track geometry (recorded by track inspection vehicle ‘AK Car’ and based on survey data), track settlement, track dynamics, and acoustic characteristics are highlighted in this paper. Comparative studies of composite materials for railway track applications are reviewed and presented in order to improve material design process. This state-of-the-art review paper will also focus on practicality and environmental risks of composite components in railway built environments. It embraces the requirement considerations of new materials for use as safety-critical track elements.

[1]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Dynamic flexural influence on a railway concrete sleeper in track system due to a single wheel impact , 2009 .

[2]  Duo Li,et al.  EVALUATION OF RAILWAY SUBGRADE PROBLEMS , 1995 .

[3]  Kenny C. S Kwok,et al.  Finite Element Modelling of Modular Precast Composites for Railway Track Support Structure: A Battle to Save Sydney Harbour Bridge , 2015 .

[4]  Kenny C. S Kwok,et al.  Composite slabs for railway construction and maintenance: a mechanistic review , 2014 .

[6]  Satish Chandra,et al.  Railway Engineering , 2008 .

[7]  Michael Burrow,et al.  Reliability analysis and maintenance decision for railway sleepers using track condition information , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[8]  Thiru Aravinthan,et al.  Composite railway sleepers - new developments and opportunities , 2015 .

[9]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Methodologies for designing railway plastic and composite sleepers , 2017 .

[10]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  A review of loading conditions for railway track structures due to train and track vertical interaction , 2008 .

[11]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Current state of practice in railway track vibration isolation: an Australian overview , 2016 .

[12]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Acoustic and Dynamic Characteristics of a Complex Urban Turnout Using Fibre-Reinforced Foamed Urethane (FFU) Bearers , 2015 .

[13]  Thiru Aravinthan,et al.  Composite railway sleepers – recent developments, challenges and future prospects , 2015 .

[14]  Louis Le Pen,et al.  Track behaviour: the importance of the sleeper to ballast interface , 2008 .

[15]  D Lyon,et al.  THE EFFECT OF TRACK AND VEHICLE PARAMETERS ON WHEEL/RAIL VERTICAL DYNAMIC FORCES , 1974 .

[16]  Joseph M. Sussman,et al.  Grand Challenges in Transportation and Transit Systems , 2016, Front. Built Environ..

[17]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Nonlinear 3D finite-element modeling for structural failure analysis of concrete sleepers/bearers at an urban turnout diamond , 2016 .

[18]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Fatigue Life Assessment Method for Prestressed Concrete Sleepers , 2017, Front. Built Environ..

[19]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  In situ performance of a complex urban turnout grillage system using fibre-reinforced foamed urethane (FFU) bearers , 2013 .

[20]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Monitoring structural deterioration of railway turnout systems via dynamic wheel/rail interaction , 2014 .

[21]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Field investigation and parametric study of greenhouse gas emissions from railway plain-line renewals , 2016 .

[22]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Experimental and numerical studies for evaluating dynamic behaviour of prestressed concrete sleepers subject to severe impact loading , 2007 .

[23]  Robert H Crawford,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions embodied in reinforced concrete and timber railway sleepers. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Dynamic Responses of Interspersed Railway Tracks to Moving Train Loads , 2018 .

[25]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Toughness of Railroad Concrete Crossties with Holes and Web Openings , 2017 .

[26]  Robert Ries,et al.  Example of a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Construction Processes , 2006 .

[27]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Reply to Giannakos, K. Comment on: Toughness of Railroad Concrete Crossties with Holes and Web Openings. Infrastructures 2017, 2, 3 , 2017 .

[28]  Javad Sadeghi,et al.  Comparisons of the mechanical properties of timber, steel and concrete sleepers , 2010 .

[29]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Identification of appropriate risk analysis techniques for railway turnout systems , 2018 .

[30]  M. Papaelias,et al.  Influences of sleeper/crosstie material choices on georisks in railway systems under climate uncertainties , 2017 .

[31]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Comparison of structural design methods for railway composites and plastic sleepers and bearers , 2017 .

[32]  S. Shi,et al.  Optimum processing parameters for wood-bamboo hybrid composite sleepers , 2014 .

[33]  Allan Manalo,et al.  Behaviour of fibre composite sandwich structures: a case study on railway sleeper application , 2011 .