Mechanisms controlling differential promoter-occupancy by the yeast forkhead proteins Fkh1p and Fkh2p: implications for regulating the cell cycle and differentiation.

The roles of DNA and Mcm1p interactions in determining the overlapping and distinct functions of the yeast cell cycle regulatory transcription factors Fkh1p and Fkh2p were examined. Full-length recombinant Fkh1p and Fkh2p were purified and their binding to bona fide promoters examined in vitro. Each protein bound a variety of target promoters with similar specificity in vitro, consistent with the observation that these proteins bind common promoters in vivo. However, in vivo, the Fkh1p and Fkh2p occupied different target promoters to different extents, suggesting that each was primarily responsible for controlling a different set of genes. Additional in vitro studies provided a mechanistic explanation for this differential promoter-occupancy. Specifically, the Fkh2p, but not the Fkh1p, was capable of binding cooperatively with Mcm1p. The Mcm1p-Fkh2p cooperative binding was enhanced by, but did not require, the presence of a Mcm1p-binding site within a target promoter. Consistent with these data, Mcm1p was present at Fkh-controlled promoters in vivo regardless of whether they contained Mcm1p-binding sites, suggesting a role for Mcm1p at promoters not thought previously to be under Mcm1p control. Analysis of Fkh1p and Fkh2p binding to promoter targets in vivo by use of mutant strains indicated that the two proteins compete for promoter-occupancy at a number of target promoters. We postulate that Fkh1p and a stable Fkh2p/Mcm1p complex compete for binding to target promoters and that the levels and/or binding activity of Fkh1p, but not Fkh2p, are most limiting for promoter-occupancy in vivo. Interestingly, the in vitro DNA-binding assays, using a variety of promoter targets, revealed that bona fide Fkh target promoters contained two or more Fkh-binding sites that allowed the Fkh1p and Fkh2p proteins to form multiple protein-DNA complexes in vitro. Multiple Fkh-binding sites may be a distinguishing feature of bona fide Fkh promoters in yeast and other organisms.

[1]  B. Amati,et al.  Myc-Max-Mad: a transcription factor network controlling cell cycle progression, differentiation and death. , 1994, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[2]  R. Medema,et al.  AFX-like Forkhead transcription factors mediate cell-cycle regulation by Ras and PKB through p27kip1 , 2000, Nature.

[3]  M. Kuo,et al.  Multiple phosphorylated forms of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mcm1 protein include an isoform induced in response to high salt concentrations , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[4]  A. Nordheim,et al.  Mcm1 is required to coordinate G2-specific transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[5]  Peter C. Hollenhorst,et al.  Forkhead genes in transcriptional silencing, cell morphology and the cell cycle. Overlapping and distinct functions for FKH1 and FKH2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Genetics.

[6]  Lukas Endler,et al.  Forkhead-like transcription factors recruit Ndd1 to the chromatin of G2/M-specific promoters , 2000, Nature.

[7]  A. Sharrocks,et al.  The MADS-box family of transcription factors. , 1995, European journal of biochemistry.

[8]  Jeffrey H. Miller Experiments in molecular genetics , 1972 .

[9]  L. Breeden,et al.  Cyclin transcription: Timing is everything , 2000, Current Biology.

[10]  A. Hoggatt,et al.  Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor-3 Homologue 1 (HFH-1) Represses Transcription of Smooth Muscle-specific Genes* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  S. Reed,et al.  Morphogenesis in the yeast cell cycle: regulation by Cdc28 and cyclins , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  K. Kaestner,et al.  Unified nomenclature for the winged helix/forkhead transcription factors. , 2000, Genes & development.

[13]  D. Luse,et al.  Two members of the HNF-3 family have opposite effects on a lung transcriptional element; HNF-3 alpha stimulates and HNF-3 beta inhibits activity of region I from the Clara cell secretory protein (CCSP) promoter. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[14]  R. Hromas,et al.  The hepatocyte nuclear factor-3/forkhead transcription regulatory family in development, inflammation, and neoplasia. , 1995, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[15]  W. Knöchel,et al.  DNA recognition site analysis of Xenopus winged helix proteins. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  R. Bassel-Duby,et al.  Transient expression of a winged-helix protein, MNF-beta, during myogenesis , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[17]  K. Clark,et al.  The yeast transcription activator PRTF, a homolog of the mammalian serum response factor, is encoded by the MCM1 gene. , 1989, Genes & development.

[18]  M. Loda,et al.  Forkhead Transcription Factors Are Critical Effectors of Cell Death and Cell Cycle Arrest Downstream of PTEN , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[19]  D Kindelberger,et al.  Cell cycle-regulated transcription of the CLB2 gene is dependent on Mcm1 and a ternary complex factor , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[20]  D. Botstein,et al.  The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. , 1998, Science.

[21]  Gerald R. Fink,et al.  Guide to yeast genetics and molecular biology , 1993 .

[22]  D. Botstein,et al.  Two yeast forkhead genes regulate the cell cycle and pseudohyphal growth , 2000, Nature.

[23]  A. Shevchenko,et al.  Forkhead transcription factors, Fkh1p and Fkh2p, collaborate with Mcm1p to control transcription required for M-phase , 2000, Current Biology.

[24]  S. Bell,et al.  The multidomain structure of Orc1 p reveals similarity to regulators of DNA replication and transcriptional silencing , 1995, Cell.

[25]  H. Endo,et al.  Forkhead Family Transcription Factor FKHRL1 Is Expressed in Human Megakaryocytes , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  R. Costa,et al.  The DNA-binding specificity of the hepatocyte nuclear factor 3/forkhead domain is influenced by amino-acid residues adjacent to the recognition helix , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[27]  K. Nasmyth,et al.  A new role for MCM1 in yeast: cell cycle regulation of SW15 transcription. , 1991, Genes & development.

[28]  B. Futcher,et al.  Cyclins and the Wiring of the Yeast Cell Cycle , 1996, Yeast.

[29]  S. Burley,et al.  Co-crystal structure of the HNF-3/fork head DNA-recognition motif resembles histone H5 , 1993, Nature.

[30]  G Melino,et al.  The p53/p63/p73 family of transcription factors: overlapping and distinct functions. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[31]  E. Lander,et al.  Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[32]  B. Cochran,et al.  The human c-fos serum response factor and the yeast factors GRM/PRTF have related DNA-binding specificities. , 1988, Genes & development.

[33]  L. Johnston,et al.  The forkhead protein Fkh2 is a component of the yeast cell cycle transcription factor SFF , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[34]  K. Luo,et al.  SIR2 and SIR4 interactions differ in core and extended telomeric heterochromatin in yeast. , 1997, Genes & development.

[35]  J. Darnell,et al.  Hepatocyte nuclear factor 3/fork head or "winged helix" proteins: a family of transcription factors of diverse biologic function. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Michael Ruogu Zhang,et al.  Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. , 1998, Molecular biology of the cell.

[37]  R. Prywes,et al.  Serum response factor: transcriptional regulation of genes induced by growth factors and differentiation. , 1995, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[38]  Gustav Ammerer,et al.  The SRF and MCM1 transcription factors. , 1992 .

[39]  G. Fink,et al.  Symmetric cell division in pseudohyphae of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1994, Molecular biology of the cell.

[40]  W. Knöchel,et al.  Five years on the wings of fork head , 1996, Mechanisms of Development.