Alternatives for skin sensitisation: Hazard identification and potency categorisation: Report from an EPAA/CEFIC LRI/Cosmetics Europe cross sector workshop, ECHA Helsinki, April 23rd and 24th 2015.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Andrew Worth | Silvia Casati | Robert Landsiedel | Emiel Rorije | David Basketter | Bruno Hubesch | Irene Manou | Annette Mehling | Laura H Rossi | Takao Ashikaga | Dirk Petersohn | Joanna Jaworska | Joop de Knecht | J. Jaworska | D. Basketter | B. Hubesch | R. Landsiedel | E. Rorije | D. Petersohn | S. Casati | A. Mehling | T. Ashikaga | S. Teissier | W. Steiling | Silvia Teissier | Winfried Steiling | Andrew Paul Worth | J. D. de Knecht | L. H. Rossi | I. Manou
[1] Frank Gerberick,et al. Nothing is perfect, not even the local lymph node assay: a commentary and the implications for REACH , 2009, Contact dermatitis.
[2] B. Pipy,et al. Contact sensitizers modulate the arachidonic acid metabolism of PMA-differentiated U-937 monocytic cells activated by LPS. , 2011, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.
[3] D. Basketter,et al. In vitro approaches to the identification and characterization of skin sensitizers. , 2013, Cutaneous and ocular toxicology.
[4] João Barroso,et al. Categorization of Chemicals According to Their Relative Human Skin Sensitizing Potency , 2014, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.
[5] W. Russell,et al. Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding Animal Testing and Research , 2011, PloS one.
[6] D. Basketter,et al. In Vitro Approaches to the Identification and Characterization of Skin Sensitizers , 2007 .
[7] Robert Landsiedel,et al. Non-animal test methods for predicting skin sensitization potentials , 2012, Archives of Toxicology.
[8] R. Landsiedel,et al. Evaluation of an optimized protocol using human peripheral blood monocyte derived dendritic cells for the in vitro detection of sensitizers: Results of a ring study in five laboratories. , 2015, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.
[9] Valérie Zuang,et al. Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects—2010 , 2011, Archives of Toxicology.
[10] Nathalie Alépée,et al. The Myeloid U937 Skin Sensitization Test (U-SENS) addresses the activation of dendritic cell event in the adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitization. , 2015, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.
[11] Petra Kern,et al. A dataset on 145 chemicals tested in alternative assays for skin sensitization undergoing prevalidation , 2013, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.
[12] M. A. Wouters,et al. Potential role of glutathione in evolution of thiol-based redox signaling sites in proteins , 2015, Front. Pharmacol..
[13] Claude Auriault,et al. Genes specifically modulated in sensitized skins allow the detection of sensitizers in a reconstructed human skin model. Development of the SENS-IS assay. , 2015, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.
[14] I Kimber,et al. Skin sensitisation testing--new perspectives and recommendations. , 2001, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.
[15] W S Stokes,et al. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel. , 2001, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[16] Silvia Casati,et al. Skin sensitisation--moving forward with non-animal testing strategies for regulatory purposes in the EU. , 2013, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[17] Petra S Kern,et al. Assessing skin sensitization hazard in mice and men using non-animal test methods. , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[18] Yuri Dancik,et al. Bayesian integrated testing strategy to assess skin sensitization potency: from theory to practice , 2013, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.
[19] Janine Ezendam,et al. Evaluating the performance of integrated approaches for hazard identification of skin sensitizing chemicals. , 2014, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[20] Martina Klaric,et al. Systematic evaluation of non-animal test methods for skin sensitisation safety assessment. , 2015, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.
[21] Casati Silvia,et al. EURL ECVAM Recommendation on the human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) for skin sensitisation testing , 2015 .
[22] Takao Ashikaga,et al. Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network‐based risk assessment model of skin sensitization , 2015, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.
[23] T. Knudsen,et al. A roadmap for the development of alternative (non-animal) methods for systemic toxicity testing. , 2012, ALTEX.
[24] Maree T. Smith,et al. In vitro methods for hazard assessment of industrial chemicals – opportunities and challenges , 2015, Front. Pharmacol..
[25] Robert Landsiedel,et al. LuSens: a keratinocyte based ARE reporter gene assay for use in integrated testing strategies for skin sensitization hazard identification. , 2014, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.
[26] Chanita Kuseva,et al. Towards AOP application--implementation of an integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA) into a pipeline tool for skin sensitization. , 2014, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[27] Robert Landsiedel,et al. Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials. , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[28] Andreas Natsch,et al. Predicting skin sensitizer potency based on in vitro data from KeratinoSens and kinetic peptide binding: global versus domain-based assessment. , 2015, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.