Fuzzy multiple criteria base realignment and closure (BRAC) benchmarking system at the Department of Defense

Purpose – The US Government adopted the base realignment and closure (BRAC) to resolve the military, economic and political issue of excess base capacity. There have been five rounds of BRAC since 1988, and more are expected to come in the years ahead. The complexity of the closure and realignment decisions and the plethora of factors that are often involved necessitate the need for a sound theoretical framework to structure and model the decision‐making process. This paper aims to address the issues.Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents a multiple criteria benchmarking system that integrates the employment, environmental, financial, strategic, and tactical impacts of the closure and realignment decisions into a weighted‐sum measure called the “survivability index.” The proposed index is used to determine whether the returns generated by each military base on the Department of Defense (DoD) hit list meet a sufficient target benchmark.Findings – There is a significant amount of evidence that int...

[1]  Fereidoun Ghasemzadeh,et al.  An integrated framework for project portfolio selection , 1999 .

[2]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Product Portfolio Management : Practices and Performance , 1999 .

[3]  L. Festinger Conflict, Decision, and Dissonance , 1964 .

[4]  Xiaoxia Huang Mean-variance model for fuzzy capital budgeting , 2008, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[5]  Adrienne Curry,et al.  Benchmarking: achieving best value in public‐sector organisations , 2003 .

[6]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  Quest 123: a benchmarking system for technology assessment at NASA , 2004 .

[7]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  PRUF—a meaning representation language for natural languages , 1978 .

[8]  T. Saaty,et al.  Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks , 1986 .

[9]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  Fahrenheit 59: An Environmental Decision Support System for Benchmarking Global Warming at Johnson Space Center , 2008 .

[10]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy logic = computing with words , 1996, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[11]  Bernard W. Taylor,et al.  Multiple criteria R&D project selection and scheduling using fuzzy logic , 1996, Comput. Oper. Res..

[12]  William E. Souder,et al.  An Interactive Decomposable Heuristic for Project Selection , 1985 .

[13]  Etienne Kerre,et al.  The cutting of compositions , 1994 .

[14]  T. Schelling,et al.  The Strategy of Conflict. , 1961 .

[15]  P. Triantafillou BENCHMARKING IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A CRITICAL CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK , 2007 .

[16]  Gregory S. Parnell Multiobjective Decision Analysis , 2008 .

[17]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Economic justification for incremental implementation of advanced manufacturing systems , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[18]  Athanasios Ballis,et al.  Development of an expert system for the evaluation of conventional and innovative technologies in the intermodal transport area , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  Euclid: Strategic Alternative Assessment Matrix , 2002 .

[20]  Jeffrey L. Ringuest,et al.  Evaluating Competing R&D Investments , 1991 .

[21]  Milan Zeleny,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) , 2004 .

[22]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks , 2005 .

[23]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Valuing R&D Projects in a Portfolio: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Emidia Vagnoni,et al.  Public sector benchmarking: an application to Italian health district activity plans , 2008 .

[25]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[26]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[27]  Milan Zelany,et al.  A concept of compromise solutions and the method of the displaced ideal , 1974, Comput. Oper. Res..

[28]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain management systems using the analytical network process , 1998 .

[29]  Henry C. W. Lau,et al.  Development of an intelligent decision support system for benchmarking assessment of business partners , 2001 .

[30]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[31]  Ricardo Ernst,et al.  An Economic Model for Evaluating Mining and Manufacturing Ventures with Output Yield Uncertainty , 2001, Oper. Res..

[32]  Abraham Mehrez,et al.  Selecting R&D projects: a case study of the expected utility approach , 1988 .

[33]  Juite Wang,et al.  A fuzzy set approach for R&D portfolio selection using a real options valuation model , 2007 .

[34]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Preference programming for robust portfolio modeling and project selection , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Constantin Zopounidis,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Aid Classification Methods , 2002 .

[36]  João Paulo Costa,et al.  The AGAP system: A GDSS for project analysis and evaluation , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  L. Kohout,et al.  FUZZY POWER SETS AND FUZZY IMPLICATION OPERATORS , 1980 .

[38]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings , 2004 .

[39]  K.L.H. Wynn‐Williams,et al.  Performance Assessment and Benchmarking in the Public Sector: An Example from New Zealand , 2005 .

[40]  A. L. PRUF a meaning representation language for natural languages , 2008 .

[41]  Yoshitaka Osawa,et al.  Development and Application of a New Methodology of Evaluating Industrial R&D Projects , 2002 .

[42]  Aleksandra Mojsilovic,et al.  A logistic regression framework for information technology outsourcing lifecycle management , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[43]  M. Cantamessa Product portfolio management , 2005 .

[44]  Christian Stummer,et al.  Interactive R&D portfolio analysis with project interdependencies and time profiles of multiple objectives , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[45]  Howard Thomas,et al.  Decision Analysis and Strategic Management of Research and Development: A comparison between applications in electronics and ethical pharmaceuticals , 1985 .

[46]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[47]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study , 2000 .

[48]  Yoshitaka Osawa,et al.  How Well Did the New Sumitomo Electric Project Ranking Method Predict Performance , 2003 .

[49]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Making decisions in hierarchic and network systems , 2008, Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci..

[50]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A priority assessment multi-criteria decision model for human spaceflight mission planning at NASA , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[51]  David L. Olson,et al.  A simulation study of IT outsourcing in the credit card business , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[52]  William J. Tarantino,et al.  Use of Decision Analysis in the Army Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) 2005 Military Value Analysis , 2006, Decis. Anal..

[53]  Richard G. Mathieu,et al.  A methodology for large-scale R&D planning based on cluster analysis , 1993 .

[54]  G. A. Hazelrigg,et al.  Radsim — A methodology for large-scale R&D program assessment , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[55]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[56]  John Golias,et al.  Towards the improvement of a combined transport chain performance , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..