An Exploration of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Post-stroke Aphasia Recovery

Predicting the potential recovery outcome of post-stroke aphasia remains a challenging task. Our previous work[10] applied machine learning algorithms to predict participant response to therapy using a complex set of brain and behavioral data in individuals with post-stroke aphasia. The present work explores the additional predictive value of cognitive composite scores (CS), which measure visuo-spatial processing and verbal working memory; high-dimensional resting-state (RS) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, which measures the functional connectivity between brain regions; and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data, which provides information related to microstructural integrity via fractional anisotropy (FA) values. We first perform feature selection on the RS data as it has about 5 times more features than than all the other feature-sets combined. Next, we append these RS features, CS scores, and FA values to our existing data set. Finally, we train Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) classifiers for various combinations of feature-sets and compare their performance in terms of accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity and selectivity. Results show that combinations of feature-sets outperform most individual feature-sets and whereas each feature-set is present among the top 20 combinations, many of them contain RS.

[1]  Swathi Kiran,et al.  Typicality-based semantic treatment for anomia results in multiple levels of generalisation , 2018, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[2]  Antonello Baldassarre,et al.  Disruptions of network connectivity predict impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  A. Ardila,et al.  Determinants of aphasia recovery: exploratory decision tree analysis , 2020 .

[4]  Heikki Mannila,et al.  Principles of Data Mining , 2001, Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science.

[5]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  H. Mononen,et al.  Aphasia, Depression, and Non-Verbal Cognitive Impairment in Ischaemic Stroke , 2000, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[7]  D. Wechsler Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale , 2021, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[8]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Nipype: A Flexible, Lightweight and Extensible Neuroimaging Data Processing Framework in Python , 2011, Front. Neuroinform..

[9]  A. Azzouz 2011 , 2020, City.

[10]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Enhanced estimations of post‐stroke aphasia severity using stacked multimodal predictions , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Predicting language outcomes after stroke: Is structural disconnection a useful predictor? , 2018, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[12]  Susan L. Whitfield-Gabrieli,et al.  Conn: A Functional Connectivity Toolbox for Correlated and Anticorrelated Brain Networks , 2012, Brain Connect..

[13]  Walter P Wodchis,et al.  The Relationship of 60 Disease Diagnoses and 15 Conditions to Preference-Based Health-Related Quality of Life in Ontario Hospital-Based Long-Term Care Residents , 2010, Medical care.

[14]  Shai Ben-David,et al.  Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms , 2014 .

[15]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  Early functional magnetic resonance imaging activations predict language outcome after stroke. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  Jennifer E. Mack,et al.  Recovery of offline and online sentence processing in aphasia: Language and domain-general network neuroplasticity , 2019, Cortex.

[17]  Ajay D. Halai,et al.  Predicting the pattern and severity of chronic post-stroke language deficits from functionally-partitioned structural lesions , 2018, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[18]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[19]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Multivariate Connectome-Based Symptom Mapping in Post-Stroke Patients: Networks Supporting Language and Speech , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  R. Kessels,et al.  The Corsi Block-Tapping Task: Standardization and Normative Data , 2000, Applied neuropsychology.

[21]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Predicting outcome and recovery after stroke with lesions extracted from MRI images , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[22]  Francesca N. Delling,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2020, Circulation.

[23]  Swathi Kiran,et al.  Treatment-related changes in neural activation vary according to treatment response and extent of spared tissue in patients with chronic aphasia , 2019, Cortex.

[24]  Margrit Betke,et al.  A machine learning approach for predicting post-stroke aphasia recovery: a pilot study , 2020, PETRA.

[25]  Irmengard Rauch 1994 , 1994, Semiotica.

[26]  J W Krakauer,et al.  Variability in language recovery after first-time stroke , 2007, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[27]  Joy Adamson,et al.  Is stroke the most common cause of disability? , 2004, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[28]  Brenda C Rapp,et al.  Statistical analysis in Small-N Designs: using linear mixed-effects modeling for evaluating intervention effectiveness , 2019, Aphasiology.

[29]  Katie Daniel,et al.  What Are the Social Consequences of Stroke for Working-Aged Adults?: A Systematic Review , 2009, Stroke.

[30]  A. Hillis,et al.  Machine learning‐based multimodal prediction of language outcomes in chronic aphasia , 2020, Human brain mapping.

[31]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[32]  C. Price,et al.  Lesion-site-dependent responses to therapy after aphasic stroke , 2018, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.