Effects of Phalaris arundinacea and nitrate-N addition on the establishment of wetland plant communities

1. Nutrient enrichment may adversely impact plant species richness in wetlands and enhance their susceptibility to colonization and dominance by invasive species. For North American prairie wetlands, enrichment by nitrate-N (NO 3 -N) from agricultural runoff is thought to contribute to the increasing colonization and dominance of Phalaris arundinacea (reed canary grass), especially during restoration. If true, P. arundinacea might compromise the re-establishment of sedge meadow vegetation on sites reflooded with agricultural drainage water. 2. We tested this hypothesis using a fertilization experiment in wetlands with controlled hydrology. A community mixture comprising 11 species from native sedge meadow was seeded in mesocosms and grown under one of three NO 3 -N levels (0 g m -2 year -1 , 12 g m - year -1 , 48 g m -2 year -1 ) with or without P. arundinacea. Above- and below-ground biomass were measured after two growing seasons to assess the response of vegetation to NO 3 -N and P arundinacea treatments. 3. The total shoot biomass of the native community was suppressed in the presence of P. arundinacea at all NO 3 -N levels, but shoot suppression was significantly greater at the highest NO 3 -N dose level (48 g m -2 ). Shoot growth of the native community was reduced by nearly one-half under these conditions. 4. The total root biomass of the community was also suppressed by P. arundinacea when no NO 3 -N was added. 5. As NO 3 -N increased, the relative abundance (shoot biomass) of native graminoids declined while native forbs increased in communities with and without Phalaris. The most common graminoid, Glyceria grandis, was suppressed by P arundinacea at all levels, with suppression enhanced at the 48 g m -2 NO 3 -N level. Three other species were suppressed at the highest NO 3 -N level, in the presence of Phalaris. The two most common forbs, Asclepias incarnata and Sium suave, exhibited a continual increase in growth with NO 3 -N additions along with overall suppression by P. arundinacea. 6. Community diversity and evenness declined with increasing NO 3 -N levels, whether or not P arundinacea was present. 7. Our results demonstrate that if P. arundinacea is present, the restored sedge meadow community will not achieve levels of abundance that are possible when this species is absent, regardless of NO 3 -N enrichment conditions. 8. At the same time, the increased suppression by P. arundinacea at the 48 g m -2 NO 3 -N dose level supports the hypothesis that the dominance of this species over the native sedge meadow community is enhanced by NO 3 -N inputs at levels that are common in agricultural landscapes. 9. Our results carry two implications for achieving biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes. First, reducing nitrate loads to wetland reserves is essential for minimizing declines in community diversity. Secondly, the use of P. arundinacea for soil conservation and other agri-environmental purposes should be curtailed because of the likelihood of off-site impacts to wetland biodiversity.

[1]  F. Berendse,et al.  The relationship between nutrient availability, shoot biomass and species richness in grassland and wetland communities , 1983, Vegetatio.

[2]  J. Dubois.  Uptake of macroelements by the helophytePhalaris arundinacea L. , 1994, Aquatic Sciences.

[3]  J. Wilson,et al.  The effect of initial advantage on the course of plant competition , 1988 .

[4]  J. Hodgson.  Chemical Control of Reed Canarygrass on Irrigation Canals , 1968 .

[5]  D. Gordon.  Effects of invasive, non-indigenous plant species on ecosystem processes: lessons from Florida. , 1998 .

[6]  D. Tilman.  Nitrogen-Limited Growth in Plants from Different Successional Stages , 1986 .

[7]  A. Symstad.  A test of the effects of functional group richness and composition on grassland invasibility. , 2000 .

[8]  A. J. Willis.  Braunton Burrows: The Effects on the Vegetation of the Addition of Mineral Nutrients to the Dune Soils , 1963 .

[9]  F. Castri,et al.  Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective , 1989 .

[10]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change , 1992 .

[11]  Susan M. Galatowitsch,et al.  The Vegetation of Restored and Natural Prairie Wetlands , 1996 .

[12]  J. Verhoeven,et al.  THE VEGETATION OF FENS IN RELATION TO THEIR HYDROLOGY AND NUTRIENT DYNAMICS: A CASE STUDY , 1988 .

[13]  J. Verhoeven,et al.  Nutrient dynamics in small mesotrophic fens surrounded by cultivated land , 1983, Oecologia.

[14]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Effect of disturbance and nutrient addition on native and introduced annuals in plant communities in the Western Australian wheatbelt , 1988 .

[15]  K. Giller,et al.  Species Richness of Herbaceous Fen Vegetation in Broadland, Norfolk in Relation to the Quantity of Above-Ground Plant Material , 1982 .

[16]  J. G. Molenaar.  The Impact of Agrohydrological Management on Water, Nutrients, and Fertilizers in the Environment of the Netherlands , 1990 .

[17]  J. Molofsky,et al.  Effects of genotypes, soil moisture, and competition on the growth of an invasive grass, Phalaris arundinacea (reed canary grass) , 1998 .

[18]  J. P. Grime,et al.  An Experimental Study of Plant Community Invasibility , 1996 .

[19]  G. Wein,et al.  Variation in survival and biomass of two wetland grasses at different nutrient and water levels over a six week period1 , 1995 .

[20]  J. P. Grime.  Control of species density in herbaceous vegetation , 1973 .

[21]  Brian G. Wolff,et al.  Forecasting Agriculturally Driven Global Environmental Change , 2001, Science.

[22]  P. Keddy,et al.  Species richness, survivorship, and biomass accumulation along an environmemtal gradient , 1988 .

[23]  J. P. Grime,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF SHOOT PHENOLOGY AND DOMINANCE IN HERBACEOUS VEGETATION , 1977 .

[24]  A. G. Valk,et al.  Restoring Prairie Wetlands: An Ecological Approach , 1994 .

[25]  H. Murkin.  Freshwater Functions and Values of Prairie Wetlands , 1998 .

[26]  J. L. Baker,et al.  Nitrate-Nitrogen in Tile Drainage as Affected by Fertilization 1 , 1981 .

[27]  S. Galatowitsch,et al.  Differences in wetland plant community establishment with additions of nitrate-N and invasive species (Phalaris arundinacea and Typha ×glauca) , 2001 .

[28]  R. Comes.  The biology and control of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) on irrigation ditchbanks , 1971 .

[29]  F. Golley,et al.  A Comparison of Variety and Standing Crop of Vegetation on a One-Year and a Twelve-Year Abandoned Field , 1965 .

[30]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. , 1980 .

[31]  J. Verhoeven,et al.  Species composition and biomass production of mesotrophic fens in relation to the nutrient status of the organic soil , 1987 .

[32]  C. B. Davis,et al.  Prairie pothole marshes as traps for nitrogen and phosphorous in agricultural runoff , 1981 .

[33]  W. Crumpton,et al.  Nitrogen Transformation and Fate in Prairie Wetlands , 1998 .

[34]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[35]  Susan M. Galatowitsch,et al.  Effects of water regime and competition on the establishment of a native sedge in restored wetlands , 2000 .

[36]  A. G. Valk,et al.  The impact of duration of drainage on the seed banks of northern prairie wetlands , 1989 .

[37]  T. Dahl,et al.  Wetlands, status and trends in the conterminous United States, mid-1970's to mid-1980's , 1991 .

[38]  P. Wetzel,et al.  Effects of nutrient and soil moisture on competition between shape Carex stricta, shape Phalaris arundinacea, and shape Typha latifolia , 1998, Plant Ecology.