Visual awareness and the on-line modification of action.

An influential theory of visually guided action proposes that (a) conscious perception of target displacement disrupts on-line action and (b) small target perturbations are inconsequential, provided the participant is unaware of them. This study examined these claims in a study of rapid aiming movements to targets. Novel features included on-line verbal reports of target displacement, and the factorial combination of small versus large displacements occurring near peak saccadic velocity or 100 ms later. Although awareness of target displacement had no effect on movement kinematics, even small target displacements near peak saccadic velocity affected kinematic measures. These results support both a strong view of visual stream separation in the on-line control of action and richer spatial coding by unconscious processes than has previously been acknowledged.

[1]  Michelle Fleury,et al.  Visual stability with goal-directed eye and arm movements toward a target displaced during saccadic suppression , 1995, Psychological research.

[2]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement , 1986, Nature.

[3]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[4]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements , 1975, Vision Research.

[5]  H Carnahan,et al.  Hand, eye, and head coordination while pointing to perturbed targets. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  M. Goodale,et al.  Frames of Reference for Perception and Action in the Human Visual System , 1998, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[7]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  A Spatially Oriented Decision Does Not Induce Consciousness in a Motor Task , 1998, Consciousness and Cognition.

[8]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  E. Komilis,et al.  Error processing in pointing at randomly feedback-induced double-step stimuli. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  R. J. Lockwood,et al.  Amplitude Scaling Compensates for Serial Delays in Correcting Eye and Arm Movements. , 1995, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  D. Elliott,et al.  Visual regulation of manual aiming , 1993 .

[12]  M. Goodale,et al.  Grasping versus pointing and the differential use of visual feedback , 1993 .

[13]  M. Desmurget,et al.  An ‘automatic pilot’ for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  J. T. Massey,et al.  Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.