Controlling the uncontrolled by noticing the unnoticed

Scientific literature is rather scarce as comes down on how to deal with Scope Creep (not be confused with Scope Changes) in Infrastructure Projects. However various studies and consulted practitioners in this study have pointed out that Scope Creep is often a root cause of project delay, cost overrun, and poor quality. Project Management faces considerable challenges to deal with the causes and consequences of Scope Creep. Scope Creep is by its (creeping) nature difficult to notice timely and therefore difficult to control. Scope creep deviates in this respect from "normal" scope changes that can be identified and controlled through regular project scope change processes. In particular in Infrastructural Projects that are realized through means of fixed-price contracts scope creep can become hazardous. Therefore, this research was executed with an objective of investigating tools, techniques, and approaches which will potentially help practitioners in minimizing/mitigating scope creep causes and dealing with scope creep consequences. Based upon the identified causes of scope creep in literature, a scope creep management model was proposed for large infrastructure projects which are executed on lump sum price contracts by design and engineering consultancies. This model has divided the management processes into two groups namely planning process group i.e. project front end loading phase and monitoring & controlling process groups i.e. project execution phase. The distinction between these two groups is vital as they require different set of tools, techniques, and approaches to control the occurrence of scope creep and change. The workability and effectiveness of the developed model were validated and optimized by a focus group of experts. Further research is suggested to investigate the application of the model and its relation to project performance.

[1]  Osama Abbas Hussain.  Direct Cost Of Scope Creep In Governmental Construction Projects In Qatar , 2012 .

[2]  John Haymaker,et al.  Measuring and Improving Rationale Clarity in a University Office Building Design Process , 2011 .

[3]  Anders Haug,et al.  Emergence patterns for client design requirements , 2015 .

[4]  S. M. Kinsella.  Activity-Based Costing: Does it Warrant Inclusion in a Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)? , 2002 .

[5]  W. Edward Back,et al.  Critical Activities in the Front-End Planning Process , 2008 .

[6]  Jana Kostalova,et al.  Project Management and its Tools in Practice in the Czech Republic , 2014 .

[7]  David Poza,et al.  Project configuration by means of network theory , 2015 .

[8]  J. Webster.  Project planning: getting it right the first time , 2004, 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8720).

[9]  Stephen Emmitt,et al.  Design Team Communication and Design Task Complexity: The Preference for Dialogues , 2008 .

[10]  Knut Samset,et al.  Early Project Appraisal , 2010 .

[11]  Sally Doughty,et al.  Body of/as knowledge , 2016 .

[12]  Knut Samset,et al.  Early Project Appraisal: Making the Initial Choices , 2010 .

[13]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[14]  S. Stinson.  BODY OF KNOWLEDGE , 1995 .

[15]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Information flow in engineering companies: problems and their causes , 2001 .

[16]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[17]  Dov Dvir,et al.  Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: the impact of changes on project success , 2004 .

[18]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  An integrated system for change management in construction , 2007 .

[19]  Frank P. Saladis,et al.  Project Management Workbook and PMP / CAPM Exam Study Guide , 2009 .

[20]  Ming Sun,et al.  PCIM: a project control and inhibiting-factors management model , 2013 .

[21]  Mendel Giezen,et al.  Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning , 2012 .

[22]  G. E. Gibson,et al.  Preproject-Planning Process for Capital Facilities , 1995 .

[23]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Using systems dynamics to better understand change and rework in construction project management systems , 2002 .

[24]  Matthijs Prins,et al.  Architectural design management within the digital design team , 2002 .

[25]  Rafi Ashrafi,et al.  Development of the SMARTTM Project Planning framework , 2004 .

[26]  Hans Petter Krane,et al.  Identification of Early Warning Signs in Front-End Stage of Projects, an Aid to Effective Decision Making☆ , 2013 .

[27]  W. Duncan.  A GUIDE TO THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE , 1996 .

[28]  N. Alp,et al.  Scope management and change control process study for project-based companies in the construction and engineering industries , 2012, 2012 Proceedings of PICMET '12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies.

[29]  H. Goldstein.  Designing Social Research for the 21st Century , 2002 .

[30]  Carl B Traylor.  Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling , 2014 .

[31]  Gabriel A. Barraza,et al.  Probabilistic Control of Project Performance Using Control Limit Curves , 2007 .