Accuracy of dental digitizers.

UNLABELLED The need for proper validation and verification methodology for CAD/CAM systems is imminent. CAD/CAM systems consisting of an optical impression system, design software and a fabrication machine have to perform to a certain level, whereby manufacturers need to prove the effectiveness of the system as a whole. However, especially when dental surface digitization devices are used as open, stand-alone applications in dental outsourcing, a reliable standard test for comparison is necessary. PURPOSE This study evaluates a proposed test method to be used to quantify "digitizing quality" with respect to accuracy and reproducibility of two dental surface digitization devices. Comparability of the characteristics should be ensured. METHOD Two laser light section scanners: DentaScope II and D200 were evaluated by means of the 'Sphere Test', that involves repeated measurements of a precision ball (radius: 6mm) according to a pre-defined protocol. The surface information was received as unmatched, overlapping point clouds and statistically processed with a newly developed software package. The standard deviation of all points as well as a measure for undercutting the equator were determined. RESULTS The standard deviation for the radius for D and S were 7.7 (+/-0.8) and 13.9 (+/-1.0) microm respectively. The equator undercut elevations were -2.0 degrees and -0.25 degrees for scanner D and S respectively. CONCLUSION Scanner D had a significantly higher accuracy than S (p<0.05), corresponding with the smaller pixel distance of the sensor. Both devices show adequate accuracy and reproducibility and have an adequate ability to detect the equator. The test is also suitable for calibration purposes.

[1]  B. Lang,et al.  Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[2]  L Pröbster,et al.  Marginal fit consistency of copy-milled all-ceramic crowns during fabrication by light and scanning electron microscopic analysis in vitro. , 1997, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[3]  J. Pfeiffer Dental CAD/CAM technologies: the optical impression (II). , 1999, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[4]  J M van der Zel Ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations with a new CAD/CAM system. , 1993 .

[5]  H. Rudolph,et al.  Matching point clouds: limits and possibilities. , 2002, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[6]  H Spiekermann,et al.  Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. , 2001, Operative dentistry.

[7]  B Bergman,et al.  The accuracy of a high-precision digitizer for CAD/CAM of crowns. , 1995, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  J M van der Zel,et al.  The CICERO system for CAD/CAM fabrication of full-ceramic crowns. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  J M van der Zel,et al.  Measurement of the margins of partial-coverage tooth preparations for CAD/CAM. , 1999, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[10]  S Karlsson,et al.  On a new method to assess the accuracy of a CAD program. , 2001, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[11]  H Denissen,et al.  Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.