A hydraulic capture application for optimal remediation design

The goal of a hydraulic capture model for remediation purposes is to design a well field so that the direction of groundwater flow is altered, thereby halting or reversing the migration of a contaminant plume. Management strategies typically require a well design that will contain or shrink a plume at minimum cost. Objective functions and constraints can be nonlinear, non-convex, non-differentiable, or even discontinuous. The solution uses optimization algorithms with groundwater flow and possibly transport simulators. The formulation of the objective function dictates possible optimization algorithms that can be used. For example, a gradient based method is likely to fail on a discontinuous objective function or gradient information may not be available. Computational efficiency as well as accuracy is desirable and often influences the choice of solution method. In this paper we present three hydraulic capture models. Our motivation is a hydraulic capture application proposed in the literature for benchmarking purposes. We present numerical results for the three models using the implicit filtering algorithm.

[1]  P. Gilmore,et al.  IFFCO (Implicit filtering for constrained optimization), users' guide , 1993 .

[2]  Manoutchehr Heidari,et al.  Applications of Optimal Hydraulic Control to Ground-Water Systems , 1994 .

[3]  G. Pinder,et al.  Groundwater management using numerical simulation and the outer approximation method for global optimization , 1993 .

[4]  Cass T. Miller,et al.  Optimal design for problems involving flow and transport phenomena in saturated subsurface systems , 2002 .

[5]  Owen J. Eslinger,et al.  IFFCO: implicit filtering for constrained optimization, version 2 , 1999 .

[6]  S. Gorelick A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods , 1983 .

[7]  B. Wagner Recent advances in simulation-optimization groundwater management modeling (95RG00394) , 1995 .

[8]  Cass T. Miller,et al.  Solution of a Well-Field Design Problem with Implicit Filtering , 2004 .

[9]  C. Shoemaker,et al.  Optimal time-varying pumping rates for groundwater remediation: Application of a constrained optimal control algorithm , 1992 .

[10]  Paul P. Wang,et al.  MT3DMS: A Modular Three-Dimensional Multispecies Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion, and Chemical Reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems; Documentation and User's Guide , 1999 .

[11]  D. McKinney,et al.  Approximate Mixed‐Integer Nonlinear Programming Methods for Optimal Aquifer Remediation Design , 1995 .

[12]  D. Ahlfeld,et al.  Advective control of groundwater contaminant plumes: Model development and comparison to hydraulic control , 1999 .

[13]  David P. Ahlfeld,et al.  PRESENCE OF NONCONVEXITY IN GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION RESPONSE FUNCTIONS , 1998 .

[14]  Cass T. Miller,et al.  Solution of a Groundwater Control Problem with Implicit Filtering , 2002 .

[15]  Carl Tim Kelley,et al.  Iterative methods for optimization , 1999, Frontiers in applied mathematics.

[16]  Mary C. Hill,et al.  MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model : user guide to the LMT6 package, the linkage with MT3DMS for multi-species mass transport modeling , 2001 .