Evaluation of Apical Leakage in Root Canals Obturated with Three Different Sealers in Presence or Absence of Smear Layer

Introduction: Microleakage can result in failure of endodontic treatment. An important characteristic of endodontic sealer is sealing ability. The aim of this experimental study was to compare the apical leakage of teeth obturated with gutta-percha and three different sealers (resin- and zinc oxide eugenol-based) with/without smear layer (SL). Materials and Methods: In this study, 100 single-rooted teeth were used after cutting off their crowns. Cleaning and shaping was carried out with step-back technique and the samples were randomly divided into three groups (n=30) which were then divided into two subgroups (n=15) according to the presence/absence of SL. Two negative and positive control groups (n=5) were also prepared. In the various groups, the canals were obturated with gutta-percha and either of the test sealers (AH-26, Adseal or Endofill). The samples were submerged in India ink for 72 h. Then they were longitudinally sectioned and observed under a stereomicroscope at 20× magnification. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistical methods and one-way ANOVA. The significance level was set at 0.05. Results: The mean penetration length of dye in AH-26, Adseal and Endofill samples were 2.53, 2.76 and 3.03 mm, respectively. The differences between three groups were not significant (P>0.05); also, the mean dye penetration in AH-26, Adseal and Endofill samples in presence or absence of the SL was not significantly different. Conclusion: AH-26, Adseal and Endofill were similarly effective in prevention of apical microleakage. Differences in the mean dye penetration between the groups with/without the SL were not statistically significant.

[1]  S. Rahimi,et al.  Push-Out Bond Strength of Dorifill, Epiphany and MTA-Fillapex Sealers to Root Canal Dentin with and without Smear Layer , 2014, Iranian endodontic journal.

[2]  M. Asnaashari,et al.  Smear Layer Removal in the Apical Third of Root Canals by Two Chelating Agents and Laser: A Comparative in vitro Study , 2014, Iranian endodontic journal.

[3]  V. Zand,et al.  A Scanning Electron Microscope Study on the Effect of an Experimental Irrigation Solution on Smear Layer Removal , 2014, Iranian endodontic journal.

[4]  M. Saghiri,et al.  Effect of Smear Layer on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Endodontic Biomaterials to Radicular Dentin , 2013, Iranian endodontic journal.

[5]  Mohamed El Sayed,et al.  Sealing ability of three single-cone obturation systems: An in-vitro glucose leakage study , 2013, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[6]  A. Shamshiri,et al.  The Effect of Different Irrigation Protocols for Smear Layer Removal on Bond Strength of a New Bioceramic Sealer , 2013, Iranian endodontic journal.

[7]  I. Yahia,et al.  A Comparative Study of the Microleakage of Resilon/Epiphany and Gutta-Percha/AH-Plus Obturating Systems , 2012, Iranian endodontic journal.

[8]  Z. Khalilak,et al.  The Effect of Blood on Apical Microleakage of Epiphany and AH26: An In Vitro Study , 2011, Iranian endodontic journal.

[9]  S. Rahimi,et al.  In vitro comparison of apical microleakage following canal obturation with lateral and thermoplasticized gutta-percha compaction techniques , 2010 .

[10]  V. Zand,et al.  A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  R. Fekrazad,et al.  The effect of Er, Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on the apical leakage of retrograde cavity , 2009, Iranian endodontic journal.

[12]  J. Radford In vitro comparison of three different lengths of remaining gutta-percha for establishment of apical seal after post-space preparation , 2009, BDJ.

[13]  S. Rahimi,et al.  In vitro comparison of three different lengths of remaining gutta-percha for establishment of apical seal after post-space preparation. , 2008, Journal of oral science.

[14]  K. Er,et al.  Evaluation of the radiopacity of new root canal paste/sealers by digital radiography. , 2008, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  A. Farhad,et al.  The Effect of Three Different Root Canal Irrigant Protocols for Removing Smear Layer on the Apical Microleakage of AH26 Sealer , 2008, Iranian endodontic journal.

[16]  M. Zarei,et al.  An In-Vitro Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Real Seal Using Fluid Filtration , 2007, Iranian endodontic journal.

[17]  S. Khedmat,et al.  Electrochemical Evaluation on Apical Leakage of AH26 Sealer after Smear Layer Removal , 2007, Iranian endodontic journal.

[18]  Ya-qin Zhu,et al.  [The influence of smear layer and different sealers on apical microleakage of root canals obturated with Ultrafil-3D system]. , 2005, Shanghai kou qiang yi xue = Shanghai journal of stomatology.

[19]  M. De Bruyne,et al.  The sealing ability of an epoxy resin root canal sealer after Nd:YAG laser irradiation of the root canal. , 2005, International endodontic journal.

[20]  O. Zmener,et al.  Evaluation of the apical seal in root canals prepared with a new rotary system and obturated with a methacrylate based endodontic sealer: an in vitro study. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[21]  T. Lambrianidis,et al.  An in vitro comparison of the sealing ability of three endodontic sealers used in canals with iatrogenic enlargement of the apical constriction. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[22]  B. Fan,et al.  A new quantitative method using glucose for analysis of endodontic leakage. , 2005, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[23]  Á. Della Bona,et al.  Comparative in vivo analysis of the sealing ability of three endodontic sealers in post-prepared root canals. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[24]  D. Pashley,et al.  Reliability of the dye penetration studies. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[25]  E. Schäfer,et al.  Effect of three different sealers on the sealing ability of both thermafil obturators and cold laterally compacted Gutta-Percha. , 2002, Journal of endodontics.

[26]  M. González-Rodríguez,et al.  A comparative study of apical leakage of Endomethasone, Top Seal, and Roeko Seal sealer cements. , 2002, Journal of endodontics.

[27]  H. Messer,et al.  Effect of removal of the smear layer on apical microleakage. , 2001, Journal of endodontics.

[28]  L. A. Silva,et al.  Evaluation of apical sealing of three endodontic sealers. , 2000, International endodontic journal.

[29]  I. Anić,et al.  Leakage of five root canal sealers. , 1999, International endodontic journal.

[30]  A. Katz,et al.  Comparison of apical leakage shown by four different dyes with two evaluating methods. , 1998, International endodontic journal.

[31]  M. Yoshikawa,et al.  Effect of particle sizes in India ink on its use in evaluation of apical seal. , 1997, Journal of Osaka Dental University.

[32]  W. Tay,et al.  A comparison of the apical dye penetration patterns shown by methylene blue and india ink in root-filled teeth. , 1995, International endodontic journal.

[33]  S. Bhambhani,et al.  Microleakage comparison of thermafil versus vertical condensation using two different sealers. , 1994, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[34]  D. Pashley Smear layer: overview of structure and function. , 1992, Proceedings of the Finnish Dental Society. Suomen Hammaslaakariseuran toimituksia.

[35]  W. A. Kennedy,et al.  Smear layer removal effects on apical leakage. , 1986, Journal of endodontics.