Ant mobility model platform for network simulator

Various ad hoc routing algorithms were proposed to increase the performance in ad hoc network. In order to estimate the performance of routing algorithms, they always simulate in ad hoc network environment, and a mobility model is also used for network simulation. There are two types of mobility models: trace and synthetic models. Trace models are more accurate than synthetic ones, and their simulation results are more accurate, too. However, new routing network environments are not easily modeled if traces have not yet been created. That is why most of the simulations are based on synthetic models. We implement, a tool for generating a special trace model, called ant mobility model. We mimic the ants' movements of an ant colony. The movement is similar to the workers in a store. We focus on the integration between the ant mobility model and the network environment. When users setup the parameters for generating an ant mobility model, the generated model can be used directly in the network environment. In order to illustrate the feasibility of ant mobility model, it is compared with the random waypoint mobility model based on the same routing algorithm, AODV, by using NS-2 simulator. Three major performance metrics, throughput, network latency, and control overhead message, are estimated. As we expected, these three metrics of the ant mobility model are better than that of the random waypoint mobility model. We suggest that a trace model, like ant mobility model, should be integrated quickly with the network environment in the same way.

[1]  Nj Piscataway,et al.  Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications , 1996 .

[2]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[3]  Sumit Ghosh,et al.  A Study of Synthetic Creativity: Behavior Modeling and Simulation of an Ant Colony , 2000, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[4]  A. M. Abdullah,et al.  Wireless lan medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications , 1997 .

[5]  Paul Douglas,et al.  Proceedings International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing.

[6]  Samir Ranjan Das,et al.  Simulation‐based performance evaluation of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks , 2000, Mob. Networks Appl..

[7]  David A. Maltz,et al.  A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols , 1998, MobiCom '98.

[8]  Tracy Camp,et al.  A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research , 2002, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[9]  Pietro Manzoni,et al.  ANEJOS: a Java based simulator for ad hoc networks , 2001, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[10]  Joseph P. Macker,et al.  Mobile Ad hoc Networking (MANET): Routing Protocol Performance Issues and Evaluation Considerations , 1999, RFC.

[11]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks , 2001, IEEE Wirel. Commun..