When children reach beyond their grasp: why some children make pronoun case errors and others don't

This research addresses the question of why some children are disposed to making a large number of pronoun case errors and others are not. The answer proposed is that when pronoun paradigm building outstrips the development of INFL, children become especially vulnerable to erring in the choice of pronominal word form, resulting in pronoun case error. On the other hand, when pronoun paradigm building proceeds more conservatively, the risk of error is reduced. The spontaneous sentence production of children observed in naturalistic caregiver – child interaction from a cross-section of 44 children (2;0–4;0) is used to support this proposal. The data show that pronoun case error was minimal among children who had strong INFL. However, among children with weak INFL there was a wide range of variation, some children making many errors and others making none. Analysis of variance confirmed that this variation was strongly related to the dispersion of production attempts across an extended pronoun paradigm, such that, the fewer cells attempted, the lower the error rate. These findings show that pronoun case errors are not an inevitable result of grammatical development, but may conceivably be avoided altogether if paradigm building proceeds at a rate commensurate with the child's development of INFL.

[1]  J. Weissenborn,et al.  Approaches to Bootstrapping: Phonological, lexical, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition. Volume 1 , 2001 .

[2]  M. Rispoli,et al.  Me or my: two different patterns of pronoun case errors. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[3]  M Rispoli,et al.  Patterns of pronoun case error , 1998, Journal of Child Language.

[4]  A. Radford Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: Head movement , 1997 .

[5]  Multiple Factors in Morphological Case-marking Errors , 2003 .

[6]  C. Tanz Cognitive principles underlying children's errors in pronominal case-marking , 1974, Journal of Child Language.

[7]  Anne Vainikka,et al.  Case in the Development of English Syntax , 1993 .

[8]  Theory and methods in the study of the development of case and agreement: a response to Schütze , 2002, Journal of Child Language.

[9]  LouAnn Gerken,et al.  Interplay of Function Morphemes and Prosody in Early Language , 1993 .

[10]  Kenneth Wexler Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivation in child grammar , 1992 .

[11]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax: The Nature of Early Child Grammars of English , 1990 .

[12]  M. Moore Third person pronoun errors by children with and without language impairment. , 2001, Journal of communication disorders.

[13]  M. Rispoli A Developmental Psycholinguistic Approach to Pronoun Case Error , 1999 .

[14]  H. Scarborough Index of Productive Syntax , 1990, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[15]  M. Moore Error analysis of pronouns by normal and language-impaired children. , 1995, Journal of communication disorders.

[16]  Genitive subjects in child English , 1998 .

[17]  N Budwig,et al.  The linguistic marking of agentivity and control in child language , 1989, Journal of Child Language.

[18]  Patricia M. Clancy,et al.  The acquisition of Japanese , 1986 .

[19]  L. Frank The Society for Research in Child Development , 1935 .

[20]  David Ingram,et al.  The Comprehension and Production of the Anaphoric Pronouns "He, She, Him, Her" in Normal and Linguistically Deviant Children. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, No. 4. , 1972 .

[21]  Stephen Wilson Lexically specific constructions in the acquisition of inflection in English , 2003, Journal of Child Language.

[22]  D. Loeb,et al.  Subject case marking and verb morphology in normally developing and specifically language-impaired children. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[23]  Kenneth Wexler,et al.  Subject Case in Children With SLI and Unaffected Controls: Evidence for the Agr/Tns Omission Model , 1998 .

[24]  M. Rispoli,et al.  Pronoun case overextensions and paradigm building , 1994, Journal of Child Language.

[25]  Towards a more precise model of pronoun case error: a response to Schütze , 2000, Journal of Child Language.

[26]  M. Rispoli,et al.  Case and agreement in English language development , 1999, Journal of Child Language.

[27]  D. Slobin The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition , 1987 .

[28]  S. Chiat,et al.  Context-specificity and generalization in the acquisition of pronominal distinctions , 1981, Journal of Child Language.

[29]  Acquisition of case marking and predicate-argument structures in Japanese : a longitudinal study of languages acquisition mechanisms , 1989 .

[30]  Michelle Aldridge,et al.  The acquisition of INFL , 1989 .

[31]  R. Brown,et al.  A First Language , 1973 .