Orbital Deformation of Satellites by Dynamical Friction in Spherical Halos with Anisotropic Velocity Dispersion

Deformation of satellite orbits around a spherical galaxy is considered. In general, a satellite sinks into the center of its parent galaxy by dynamical friction. Unless the orbit is exactly circular, the orbital shape changes, owing to a difference in decaying rate between energy and angular momentum. This deformation depends on the density and velocity distributions of the surrounding galactic halo. We have made a perturbative analysis of the orbital deformation in a scale-free halo that has a density profile ρ ∝ rn(-3 ≤ n ≤ 0), with anisotropic velocity dispersion characterized by β = 1 - σ/σ(-1 ≤ β ≤ 1). We classify four major effects on the orbital deformation. The dominant effect originates from the density gradient for n -2. Both effects lead to more circular orbits. Larger β makes the rate of orbital circularization smaller. For positive β (radially dominated anisotropy), initially eccentric orbits conserve their shape during orbital decay when the velocity dispersion is radially dominated.

[1]  Jeremiah P. Ostriker,et al.  Galactic disks, infall, and the global value of Omega , 1992 .

[2]  S. White,et al.  Simulations of X-ray clusters , 1994, astro-ph/9408069.

[3]  M. Weinberg Self-gravitating response of a spherical galaxy to sinking satellites , 1989 .

[4]  L. Hernquist,et al.  Simulations of satellite orbital decay , 1989 .

[5]  S. Tremaine,et al.  The formation of the nuclei of galaxies. I. M31. , 1975 .

[6]  S. Cole,et al.  Merger rates in hierarchical models of galaxy formation , 1993 .

[7]  G. Lake,et al.  Morphological Transformation from Galaxy Harassment , 1997, astro-ph/9701211.

[8]  S. White,et al.  The Assembly of galaxies in a hierarchically clustering universe , 1994, astro-ph/9408067.

[9]  J. Binney Dynamical friction in aspherical clusters , 1977 .

[10]  R. Carlberg,et al.  Sinking Satellites and Tilting Disk Galaxies , 1995, astro-ph/9511076.

[11]  D. Merritt Relaxation and tidal stripping in rich clusters of galaxies. III. Growth of a massive central galaxy , 1985 .

[12]  E. Phinney,et al.  Dynamical Friction and Orbit Circularization , 1987 .

[13]  D. Sanders,et al.  LUMINOUS INFRARED GALAXIES , 1996 .

[14]  Carlos S. Frenk,et al.  A recipe for galaxy formation , 1994 .

[15]  C. Flynn,et al.  Kinematics of the system of blue horizontal branch field stars of the outer Galactic halo , 1994 .

[16]  J. Christopher Mihos,et al.  Quantifying the Fragility of Galactic Disks in Minor Mergers , 1996 .

[17]  S. White,et al.  Accretion of satellite galaxies and the density of the Universe , 1994 .

[18]  The rise and fall of satellites in galaxy clusters , 1996, astro-ph/9611078.

[19]  Submitted to the Astrophysical Journal Excitation of Activity in Galaxies by Minor Mergers , 1995 .

[20]  K. Jedamzik The Cloud in cloud problem in the Press-Schechter formalism of hierarchical structure formation , 1994, astro-ph/9408080.

[21]  T. Statler Orbital decay in aspherical galaxies. I: Oblate systems , 1988 .

[22]  The origin of brightest cluster galaxies. , 1997, astro-ph/9709102.

[23]  A. Dressler,et al.  The Morphology of Distant Cluster Galaxies. II. HST Observations of Four Rich Clusters at z ≃ 0.4 , 1997 .

[24]  J. C. Muzzio,et al.  Orbital decay of galactic satellites as a result of dynamical friction , 1997 .

[25]  William H. Press,et al.  Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation , 1974 .

[26]  G. Lake,et al.  Galaxy harassment and the evolution of clusters of galaxies , 1995, Nature.

[27]  Gerald D. Quinlan The dynamical evolution of massive black hole binaries i , 1996 .

[28]  Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar,et al.  Dynamical friction. I. General considerations: the coefficient of dynamical friction , 1943 .

[29]  Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar,et al.  Ellipsoidal Figures of Equilibrium , 1969 .