Do unto others or not: equity in feedback for undergraduates

This article argues that the mechanisms and research culture that support university academics when writing articles for publication in an iterative feedback cycle, and which are within the tenets of good pedagogic principles of formative assessment and feedback (Sadler, 1989), are often missing to support undergraduate students in their learning. The reasons for this are mainly historical. Generally, this process is only available in universities at postgraduate level, as undergraduates tend not to be included in this type of learning culture. This is exacerbated because of the exclusion of undergraduates from assessment processes, which would help them to understand and assimilate the feedback on their work. Data collected from validated documentation of undergraduate programmes at a new English university were used to attempt to quantify possible feedback available to students and their access to assessment.

[1]  P. Black,et al.  Meanings and Consequences: a basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment? , 1996 .

[2]  M. Atkins.  Assessment Issues in Higher Education. , 1993 .

[3]  Arkalgud Ramaprasad,et al.  On the definition of feedback , 1983 .

[4]  M. Taras,et al.  The Use of Tutor Feedback and Student Self-assessment in Summative Assessment Tasks: Towards transparency for students and for tutors , 2001 .

[5]  D. James.  Making the graduate: perspectives on student experience of assessment in higher education , 2000 .

[6]  Nancy Allen,et al.  Assessment in Higher Education , 1992 .

[7]  John Cowan,et al.  A CASE FOR SELF‐ASSESSMENT BASED ON RECENT STUDIES OF STUDENT LEARNING , 1985 .

[8]  M. Taras,et al.  To Feedback or Not to Feedback in Student Self-assessment , 2003 .

[9]  A. Flier.  Assessment: Social Practice and Social Product , 2000 .

[10]  D. Sadler,et al.  Formative Assessment: revisiting the territory , 1998 .

[11]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[12]  Patricia Broadfoot,et al.  Education, assessment, and society : a sociological analysis , 1996 .

[13]  G. Boulton‐Lewis.  Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .

[14]  Gijsbert Erkens,et al.  Teachers' Assessment of Students' Research Skills. , 2004 .

[15]  D. Fazey,et al.  Self‐assessment as a Generic Skill for Enterprising Students: the learning process , 1993 .

[16]  D. Sadler.  Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[17]  J. Haywood,et al.  The ASSHE Inventory: Changing Assessment Practices in Scottish Higher Education. , 1996 .

[18]  M. Taras,et al.  Using Assessment for Learning and Learning from Assessment , 2002 .

[19]  Lorraine Stefani,et al.  Assessment in Partnership with Learners , 1998 .

[20]  Hugh Somervell,et al.  Issues in Assessment, Enterprise and Higher Education: the case for self‐peer and collaborative assessment , 1993 .

[21]  Phil Hodkinson,et al.  Research as a form of work: expertise, community and methodological objectivity , 2004 .

[22]  David Boud,et al.  Enhancing learning through self assessment , 1995 .

[23]  D. Boud.  Assessment and the promotion of academic values , 1990 .

[24]  Michal Zellermayer,et al.  The study of teachers' written feedback to students' writing: changes in theoretical considerations and the expansion of research contexts , 1989 .